As time and the London mayoral election campaign goes by, the Labour candidate Sadiq Khan is starting to look less and less like a clean hands candidate. There have been long-standing concerns about Khan’s associations with Islamic extremists, although Khan’s dodgy friends don’t seem to bother the London Labour Party. Sadly we should not be surprised that Labour seem to be unconcerned about Khan’s extremism connections bearing in mind that the Labour party in London, as in too many other areas, have morphed without any sense of shame, into being ‘the Islam party’.
Labour’s response to reams of valid criticism of those who are concerned at the prospect of a supporter of Islamism in City Hall has been of course to scream ‘racist’ at critics of Khan, including the Prime Minister David Cameron. Labour have also managed to wheel out some of London’s more idiotic LGB and T groups who have supported Khan. These LGBT groups are basically a ‘beard’ to make Khan seem less like the dangerous associate of extremists that he appears to be. Various Lefty and pro-Islam groups have done their utmost to smear those who criticise Khan for his widely documented associations with extremists.
But the bad smell around Khan just won’t go away. Khan’s associations with questionable individuals and questionable groups cannot be merely explained away as brief meetings or even essential meetings as part of Khan’s ‘human rights’ work. According to press reports Khan met NINE TIMES with Suliman Gani, a supporter of the murderous, genocidal Islamic State. You can explain away one or two meetings but nine of them? Then there are the four times that Khan attended events by an organisation that later merged with the Islamic extremists of CAGE called ‘Stop Political Terror’. Also you need to include in Khan’s questionable background his support for Babar Ahmed a supporter of the Taliban. Oh and for good measure he also attended several demonstrations put together by supporters of Abu Hamza. This is not the sort of behaviour of someone who could be described as ‘moderate’.
Taliban supporters, ISIS supporters, Abu Hamza supporters and an organisation that eventually became CAGE which called the murderous scumbag ‘Jihadi John’ a ‘beautiful man’. It’s not looking good for Khan’s claim that he is a moderate or will be a mayor for all Londoners is it? Khan’s CV is beginning to look a little like the UN Al Qaida, ISIS and Taliban sanctions list. Londoner’s need to ask themselves do they really want a suspected supporter of Islamism, and a person who is evasive when asked about his connections with treasonous Islamists, as mayor of Britain’s capital city?
I along with many others find that we cannot have confidence that Khan will be a mayor for all Londoners. The massive amount of evidence that points to Sadiq Khan’s questionable views, actions and connections preclude that confidence. His dubious background and even familial connections to dangerous Islamists mean that Khan is less likely to be unifying mayor and much more likely to become another Lutfur Rahman. A Khan mayoralty is likely to quickly morph into one very similar to the vile, bent administration of Tower Hamlets under Rahman. A Khan mayoralty would see resources and political advantage being funneled towards Khan’s own community, including the more dangerous bits of it, with everyone else getting a very bad deal indeed.
Labour must have known about Khan’s dodgy connections, how could they not? Information about it is not that difficult to find. They must have known about Khan’s large number of meetings with extremists, his familial connections with extremists, his ‘human rights’ work that benefited extremists. He should have been dropped like a hot extremist potato. Instead Britain’s terminally Islamopandering Labour party decided that their best chance of taking City Hall was by putting up an associate of Islamic extremists who would then attract the votes of all those many tens of thousands of London Muslims who are either supporters of Islamic extremism, or who are ambivalent about extremism.
Khan is unfit to run London, in fact he’s probably not even fit to run a bath. Many of us have political skeletons in our closets, such as a short period of youthful membership of some socialist party, but Khan doesn’t just have a few skeletons he has a whole graveyard of them. Khan should be held to the same standards of behaviour as anybody else. If another poltiician had had a long history of association with the far right British National Party or the National Front or British Movement then they would be correctly called out on it and it would damage them politically. Khan’s long association with the Islamic equivalent of the BNP, NF and BM also needs to be called out. Khan’s penchant for hanging around with jihad supporters and those who praise ISIS should be just as damaging to him as having long associations with fascist organisations would be to others.
Judging by Khan’s worrying record it really does look like a case of if you want a Jihadist, a supporter of terror or an Islamic rapist for a neighbour, then it really would pay to vote Labour. If you don’t want to see such a disaster overtake our capital city then vote for the candidate you judge is most likely to beat this known supporter and associate of some of Britain’s most dangerous Islamist groups. Finally, Khan is likely to be a beneficary of the ‘whipped mosque vote’ and probably some bent postal votes. This is why it is absolutely vital that people who are opposed to the idea of a supporter of Islamism in City Hall get out and vote in order to dilute the effect of the whipped mosque vote and the bent Islamic postal vote. Don’t stay home on polling day because if you do the supporters of Islamism will win.
Links
Press articles about Sadiq Khan and his extremism connections
Al Qaida sanctions list
https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/sites/www.un.org.sc.suborg/files/1267.pdf
