In a thought provoking article on The Commentator blog the Anglo-Israeli writer Adam Mallerman states that Hamas have come off worse not only in the recent conflict but also in the diplomatic settlement. Hamas, according to Mr Mallerman, have been put in a difficult position as any infraction of the cease fire will quite obviously bring down Israeli just retribution upon their heads. Mr Mallerman also states that Egypt wants to regain its leading position in the Arab world and not surrender to Iran, who are supporters and sponsors of Hamas.
Excellent article, worth reading and quoted below;
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/2111/gaza_ceasefire_hamas_s_celebrations_mask_major_defeat
“My initial reaction to the ceasefire announced yesterday was anger: this makes no sense, the job isn’t done, and Hamas will claim victory. But then I started to think: Netanyahu is nobody’s fool, and neither is Egypt’s Morsi, who has proven himself a skilled opportunist politician. So then I began to ask myself: what has really happened tonight? What has Israel been promised?
It was no coincidence that Hillary Clinton had been shuttling between the two leaders all day. Whatever she had said to both men, and especially to Netanyahu, was seemingly enough for him to call a ceasefire. But what could she offer him?
That’s easy: Iran. Hamas is a distraction; it is merely Iran’s proxy, therefore a symptom of the problem which in Israel’s mind has always been Iran. Clearly, Netanyahu has got the policy agreement with the Obama administration that he has craved for months – that’s a big victory for him.
In addition, it is clear from the various leaders’ statements that Hamas has been placed on a very short leash. Netanyahu is not withdrawing his forces from Gaza’s border and if there is any infraction of the ceasefire, those men will be going in.
Over the past few days, international support has largely been on Israel’s side, but it has been made clear that a ground incursion would seriously damage that support. Now, if Hamas and Islamic Jihad do not abide by a ceasefire that has essentially been forced on them by Egypt, Israel appears to have a clear green light from the US (and Egypt) to use ground forces. That’s also a major victory, and in part is due to how successful Israel has been in getting its ‘message’ out.
So what’s in it for Egypt’s President Morsi, who after all, was not a combatant in this fracas?
Morsi is very astute and, to date, he has been successful in navigating a difficult path between being an Islamic Brotherhood president and still being seen as a man the West can deal with.
The jury is still out as to whom Morsi really is, but he certainly does not have an easy job: He leads a country with a deep-rooted anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel, which is also at peace with Israel. Consequently, he has been seen, even by Israel, as someone who can act as a go-between.
What is more, Egypt used to be the leader of the Arab world, and could well retake that position, but today there’s another candidate for the role, and one that isn’t even Arab – Iran.
I can only speculate what gains Morsi has taken from his role in the ceasefire as probably much of it will not become apparent right away. But Morsi’s role was likely rewarded by the US, probably with promises of aid, sophisticated weapons etc. But it’s important also to consider his own stance on Hamas if we are to speculate what he has to gain.
Hamas is a essentially an irritant for the Egyptian president – it entangles Egypt with Iran and agitates the Egyptian public vis-à-vis Israel, which is the last thing he needs if he is to maintain a relationship with the US that Egypt needs, but that its people hate.
Moreover, Hamas’s Gaza provides a base for the “Sinai terrorists” who are causing him headaches and have cost him a lucrative source of income supplying Israel and Jordan with gas.
For Morsi, then, seeing Hamas’s reined in is in his own interests – and he is vital to the collar that has been placed on the neck of Hamas. He has agreed to restrict Hamas’s weapons supply routes through Egypt, and Hamas cannot be pleased about that.
In Gaza they will celebrate their ‘victory’ – this ceasefire allows them just enough scope to spin it that way to Palestinians who want to believe they won. But Hamas has got little else from it.
Hamas has lost key generals, international support, used up a huge quantity of its weapons, lost key infrastructure, and helped give Israel the international support it needs for a ground operation in Gaza if Hamas misbehaves.
In addition, Israel’s Iron Dome has proven very successful, and the US has agreed to supply more, making Hamas’s weapons of choice increasingly less effective as the days go by. Hamas has also probably not delighted its Iranian masters either, as this conflict has brought Israel and the US closer than it has been since Obama took office – good news for Israel, but bad news for Iran as the US-Israeli divide was primarily over Iran in the first place.
In fact, other than a possible improvement in support from Palestinians and some bragging rights in questionable circles, it is hard to see what, if anything, Hamas got out of the past week.
What an incredible load of pedsuo-intellectual horse hockey. The Jews were there until the Romans crushed their rebellion in the first century AD. Some still lived there but most dispersed around the world, where they were routinely persecuted under all kinds of anti-jewish justifications throughout the centuries. It was the UN (that took over after the British got tired of all the sectarian fighting between post-WWII jews and the arabs in the area) that created the ridiculous 1948 partition between arab and Jew. It was the arabs that attacked the Jewish state for the unforgivable crime of not wanting to live as second class citizens under islamofascism. Israel won that war and the right to exist. The surrounding muslim nations kept starting new wars, in 1956, in 1967, and were about to start another war in 1973 but the Israelis beat them to the punch. In each one of these wars the Israelis were outnumbered by muslims, but they defeated the aggressors. Muslims have committed terrorist atrocities repeatedly, attacking civilians, shooting up Israeli schools, blowing up buses, sending in mentally retarded women and children with suicide bomb vests to blow up shops and restaurants. Truly vile and utterly contemptible acts of barbarism. Now muslims are launching missiles supplied by Iran and Egypt from Gaza, and the IDF is responding to protect their country. Muslims continue to lie about what is going on even CNN has had to acknowledge that the little muslim boy the Egyptian PM was mourning in that photo for being hit by an IDF air strike was actually killed by a Hamas rocket that fell short of its intended target. Israel has EVERY right to defend itself against muslim aggression. Arabs in Israel have the right to vote, to hold public office and to be free. They are not treated as second class citizens within Israel. There is no such country as Palestine’ and if other muslim countries actually cared about the well being of the palestinian refugees’ they would take the money they are spending trying to exterminate Israel and use it instead to take the land perhaps the Sinai Penninsula that Israel already gave back to Egypt as part of the Sadat-Begin peace treaty that Egypt is now looking to break to help these refugees build themselves a nation. Israel is not the bad guy here. I am not suffering from some ridiculous Jew Hater guilt in defending Israel from muslim aggression and lies. There are no such things as unicorns, rainbow bridges or leprechauns, either. Reality is not a shades-of-gray’ concept. There is right and there is wrong. People who want to come up with shades-of-gray’ hairsplitting are trying to force through rationalization the square peg of reality into the round hole of self-justification for their own preferred behavior or perceptions. I am just as guity of sin and wrong-doing as the next person. It doesn’t make something less wrong simply because I rationalize an action to fool myself into believing it is right. War is a terrible thing, as I know first hand. But refusing to fight for what is right against evil is always a far worse thing.Reply