A Muslim social services receptionist accessed a confidential database, extracted information about the victim of an Islamic Grooming Gang and then passed that information onto one of the defendants. Because of her actions witnesses and victims were put in fear, and an offender who really should have gone down for rape, instead went down for the lesser offence of sexual activity with a child. This appalling story, is yet another example of how the Islamic fifth column is undermining our society, our justice system and our institutions.
During the case, Mahdiya Khan supplied information about the victim to those connected with the defendants, one of whom was her boyfriend at the time. The information was used by the friends and relatives of one of the defendants to harass the victim into changing her statement. Intolerable pressure was put on the victim, with hundreds of calls made to her in order to get her to change her story.
Because of Mahdiya Khan’s involvement and interference with the case, the victim changed her story. The result of Mahdiva Khan’s actions was that several defendants were found not guilty and another defendant, Mahdiya Khan’s boyfriend, Mohammed Imran Amjad, ended up pleading guilty to a lesser charge, for which he received only four years imprisonment.
This case, from the counterjihad blog Kafircrusader, is another example of Muslims having more allegiance to each other and their foul ideology than to any concept of justice.
The BBC said:
“Mohammed Imran Amjad ‘s girlfriend accessed a database 60 times A woman who worked in social services has been jailed for attempting to derail a grooming trial. Receptionist Mahdiya Khan accessed a computer database 60 times to get details of a child sex victim. She was jailed for eight months, but details have only just emerged. Three men have also been found guilty of interfering in the case.
Mohammed Imran Amjad, 26, was earlier jailed for four years and three months after he admitted abusing a child. Five others were cleared of rape, sexual assault and child abduction at Burnley Crown Court in April. Suspended and dismissed Detectives realised Amjad’s girlfriend, Mahdiya Khan, had tried to undermine the case. She was a receptionist working for Lancashire County Council social services in Burnley. They found she accessed a confidential database 60 times over 15 days to find details of the witness and her family. The county council said she was immediately suspended and dismissed. A spokesman said: “When this security breach came to light, the advice from our data protection team was that no further practical steps could have been taken to prevent it from having occurred.”
One aspect of this case that concerns me, is how data is handled at Lancashire Social Services. Why was someone on a relatively low responsibility grade, such as a receptionist, allowed access to such sensitive information, especially information that is connected with a child abuse trial? Why also were social services not aware that there was a connection between their receptionist and one of the defendants? ‘No further practical steps that the council could have taken’, don’t make me laugh. If it is possible for those in the civil service who are only cleared to Restricted level to be denied access to data that is Confidential or above, then it is perfectly feasible for staff in lowly support roles, such as that occupied by to be denied access to things like victim and victim family details.
This appalling and worrying case will make people wonder how many other Muslims there are in the public sector who are not working for all, but instead are working only for their family, friends and other Muslims. Are Islamic staff in housing offices blocking non-Muslims from public housing, or allocating services such as elderly care on the basis of Islamic belief? What about school allocations, libraries, grant making bodies, or leisure services, are these corrupted by bent Islamic staff as well? Would you want to be a non-Muslim resident in an area where the local social services are staffed or controlled by Muslims? In boroughs where Islam is in control, no non-Muslim can ever expect to get either a fair hearing or fair treatment.
This shoddy dishonest and despicable behaviour of Mahdiya Khan, who has fortunately been jailed for 8 months, has opened up a whole can of worms that urgently needs to be examined.
It’s time for Eric Pickles to stop believing the guff that he is probably fed by his Civil Servants and advisers and attend to the horrific corruption of public services that is happening in too many of our Labour / Islamic fiefdoms.
This case is typical of what happens when the idea of ‘diversity’ is put ahead of concepts of public sector probity. Sadly I don’t think this is the last or the only case of Muslim public sector workers assisting Muslim criminals that is going to come to light. Thanks Labour, for inviting this disgusting and dangerous fifth column into our town halls.
Links
Kafircrusader’s take on this case
BBC’s article on the interference with the grooming trial
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-23907268
Background to this story
Man jailed for witness interference in grooming trial
Accused of interference in grooming trial
