When faced with a threat, especially an existential one, it is very easy to despair. Continually seeing news reports and webcasts detailing atrocious Islamic cruelty often accompanied by the cry of ‘allah hu akhbar’, can make it seem to some as if the battle is lost. The treasonous actions of the Quslings for Islam, such as this fellow, and the extent to which they’ve managed to attach themselves to the taxpayers teat, can make people wary of politically fighting, and standing up to, the useful idiots who have over the last decade or so, become the Establishment.
But all is not lost. The vandals have not yet won. The two stories I bring to you to today are both from the United States. The first piece, from the counterjihadist Citizen Warrior explains how people are starting to wake up to the problems that Islam is bringing to their society. Citizen Warrior states that with an expansion of methods of learning and communication technologies, more people now understand what Islam really is, rather than what they have been told Islam is.
More and more people are finding out that Islam is not a religion of peace but rather a religion of dominance, authoritarianism and genocide. The truth is beginning to stride across the world like a tidal wave.
Citizen Warrior said:
“Has anything changed since 2001? In many ways it would be justifiable to answer no. Politicians and the media are still pitifully reluctant to speak honestly about anything Islam-related. Stealth jihad is still progressing, and bloody jihad is going on as before.
However, many important things have changed. Many more people have awakened to the fact that Islamic doctrine is dangerous to non-Muslims, and our growing numbers have allowed some good legislation to pass. ACT! for America’s membership is multiplying and its clout is growing along with it. Several states in the U.S. have passed American Laws for American Courts legislation, and more are in the process. But the one change that really stands out is the amount of good educational material available about Islam.
When the Towers came down, many of us tried to find answers. We wondered why it happened. Who did this and what motivated them? And those answers were hard to find. That has changed completely. When someone looks for information about Islam now, they can get real answers easily. If you Google the question, “Is Islam dangerous?” or “Does Islam promote violence?” or “Why do Muslims want to kill us?” you will find good answers on the first page of search results. The Koran, the Sira and the Hadith are available in readable form now. That wasn’t the case in 2001. And of course, web sites like WikiIslam.net and TheReligionofPeace.com and blogs and Facebook pages and so on are all over the place now.
People are continually waking up to the disturbing truth about Islamic doctrine. I hear from people all the time who have only recently started looking into Islam because of the Lee Rigby beheading or because of the Boston Marathon bombing. Maybe they were too young on 9/11 to grasp what had happened. But the point is, when people look for answers, now they can find them, so the pace of awakening our fellow non-Muslims is accelerating. “
Read the rest of this piece at: http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2013/09/september-11-2013-has-anything-changed.html
It should make any opponent of Islamofascism proud to see that attitudes are starting to change. I’m noticing that more people are prepared to take the rise out of Islam online these days and tell the truth about Islam in the pubs and in their homes and to their friends. Despite many countries, Britain especially, having a media that hiding the truth about Islam, sometimes for reasons of misguided anti-racist sentiment, more people are saying Islam has gone too far. The evidence of their own eyes, the wrecked towns and cities, the mass rapes, the welfare dependence and the murderous terrorism, is countering the propaganda of outlets like the BBC.
This advancing of the banner of truth when it comes to Islam is one of the reason why Islamic countries want to have an international ‘respect for religion’ agreement which would in effect criminalise criticism of Islam. Islam cannot exist in it’s current form in societies where people are free to criticise the ideology and subject their texts to analysis. Islam wants censorship, freedom is a threat to Islam which is why Islam hates freedom and seeks to undermine it by supporting ‘hate speech’ laws.
We must keep on speaking the truth about Islam and we should challenge the ideology where ever we can. If Islam wins then all voices will be silenced.
– – – – – – – – – –
The second item I wish to highlight is one from Atlas Shrugs, the website run by the doughty fighter against Shariah Law, Pamela Geller.
Ms Geller tells the tale of how, despite years of not wanting to touch the issue of Islam in anyway apart from appeasement, some members of the United States legislature are also starting to wake up to not only the direct threats from Islam themselves but also the appeasers in their establishment.
Ms Geller said:
“Finally, pushback against the systemic infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood terror proxies in the US government. Not everyone is on the jihad payroll.
Join Congressman Frank Wolf in demanding punishment for conspiring with the enemies of the United States. Call your congressman.
We want hearings on infiltration of the USG by the Muslim Brotherhood. Read the Inspector General’s report here.
Wolf Demands FBI Punish Agents For CAIR Contact IPT, September 19, 2013
On a day when the Council on American-Relations (CAIR) issued a report accusing its critics of bigotry, a Justice Department investigation reminds the public why CAIR does not merit the public’s trust.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz found a series of incidents in which FBI field offices knowingly engaged in outreach activity with CAIR despite a 2008 policy banning non-investigative cooperation with the Islamist group. Only a summary of the report has been released publicly. The rest is considered classified, but has been made available to Congress.
The ban on interactions with CAIR, first reported by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, resulted from an FBI investigation into a Muslim Brotherhood-created Hamas-support network in the United States.
Internal documents seized by the FBI show that CAIR and its founders, Omar Ahmad and Nihad Awad, were a part of that network known as the Palestine Committee. Both men appear on a telephone list of Palestine Committee members (Awad is listed under a pseudonym “Omar Yehya), and CAIR is listed on a meeting agenda listing the committee’s branches.
“[U] ntil we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS,” an FBI official wrote in 2009, “the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner.”
But several FBI field office agents-in-charge balked at the policy, the Inspector General’s report finds, and the FBI’s Office of Public Affairs repeatedly offered field offices conflicting information. Despite a series of electronic communications explaining the CAIR ban – it does not apply to criminal investigations or civil rights complaints – issued from August-December 2008, and despite a mandatory meeting for Special Agents in Charge (SAC) of field offices, the head of the Los Angeles FBI office told his agents to ignore FBI headquarters.
“[W]e will decide how our relationship is operated and maintained with CAIR barring some additional instruction from FBI Headquarters,” the Los Angeles SAC wrote. “Please instruct your folks at this time that are not to abide by the … [policy] but that their direction in regards to CAIR will come from the LA Field Office front office.”
In a scathing letter to new FBI Director James Comey, U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., called the violations “intolerable” and demanded punishment for those responsible, including “separation from the FBI.”
Read the rest of this article here: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/09/congressman-wolf-demands-fbi-punish-agents-for-cair-contact.html#more
Another awakening, this time it’s someone from the legislature. This must be looked at in a positive light. In Congressman Wolf, we have someone who has looked into the massive problems that the American public sector has with Islamic and Jihadist infiltration. Again this is something that may not have happened five or ten years ago, for fear that those who brought to light such problems would be smeared with the words ‘racist’ or ‘bigot’. Look how the Islamic grievance machine sprung into action in Britain when former Home Secretary Jack Straw and the Member of Parliament Anne Cryer criticised Islamic cultural practises. Although the fake grievance machines of organisations like Tell Mama are still going, there are many more of us out there who are prepared to tell them that they are talking out of an orifice that isn’t usually used for speech.
We must hear the great horn of freedom and defend that which took a lot of winning from those who would give up freedom in order to satisfy a failed ideology or because rolling over lines their pockets
It pleases me to say that there are more people becoming unwilling to surrender, more people realising what is right and what is patently wrong. The future doesn’t have to belong to them.
A little hope maybe – please remember however, that it was only in the recent past that Pamela Geller was refused permission to enter the UK. Her voice will not be allowed to ring out for anyone to be persuaded by because the Home Office clearly believes she’s a security threat of some kind.
I’ve not noticed any change in policy from Theresa May’s department since the ban; let alone an apology for the insult levied on Pamela who May must therefore still consider to be a dangerous racist bigot.
When I do notice something positive happen, then will be the time to think that the much needed front for the allies in this life and death situation has finally opened.
John,I completely understand the issues with the quite treasonous attitudes of Thereasa May. However, it cannot be denied that people on the street are more willing to say ‘bollocks to Islam’. That is a significant difference from only a few years back.
Part of the problem with the Home Office is it contains senior civil servants and advisors who were put in place by Labour and who are still spreading their Jihadist and Islamic poison within the department. It does help to rmember that there are many more of us, ie those opposed to Islamofascism, than are members of the Establishment cheerleading for it. It may not seem that way but there is a sea change happening.
IN the fight agaisnt Islam we cannot afford to surrender to despair because surrendering to despair is only one step towards full Islamification.