Parramatta City, New South Wales, the site of the latest eruption of Islamic sexual deviancy.
Can anybody guess from which community or ideology this defendant came from or followed. Could he be an extremist Methodist? Nope. What about a militant Jew? Nope. Well could he even be an angry Anglican, wrong again. Yes you were probably right with your first guess which was Muslim.
The phrase: “The defendant has a disregard for the laws of this state,” was uttered by Magistrate Caleb Franklin, at Raymond Terrace Local Court, Parramatta City, New South Wales, Australia, during the hearing of a case where a Muslim man gave his 12 year old daughter in marriage to a Lebanese Muslim man.
The HalalPorkShop blog quoting from the Parramatta Sun newspaper said:
“A father who allowed his 12-year-old daughter to be married in an illegal ceremony has been refused bail, despite him arguing the child bride was a “strong-willed woman” who was “in love”.
The 61-year-old was refused bail by a Newcastle court on Wednesday after police charged him with accessory before the fact of sexual intercourse with a child aged 10 to 14 years and procuring a child under the age of 14 for unlawful sexual activity.
In refusing him bail, Magistrate Caleb Franklin said the facts indicated the defendant believed he had done nothing wrong, Raymond Terrace Local Court heard.
“Even if the allegations against him are proved he believes there is nothing wrong with the behaviour alleged,” Magistrate Franklin said.
“The defendant has a disregard for the laws of this state,” he said.”
Do not those words ‘the defendant has a disregard for the laws of the state’ describe so many other of the behaviours of the followers of Islam. Does it not describe the attitudes of too many Muslims who disregard the laws on female genital mutilation, under-age marriage, planning, equality, health and safety, electoral honesty, fiscal probity etc etc.
What a vile Islamic freak this father is. Not only did he convert to an ideological path that treats women like dirt, he then brainwashed his child into believing that a 7th century paedophile should be an object of veneration, convinced her that she should marry illegally and then married her off to another Islamic nonce.
This story is another proof that the ideology of Islam is in, and of itself, poison. Nonces can come from all communities but Islam, alone of all the major faiths, normalises noncing. To Islam having sex with a pubescent or pre-pubescent girl is embedded in Islam’s theological and cultural DNA and this is another reason why the ideology of Islam should not be treated the same as other faiths or ideologies. This is Islam, the destroyer of women and girls, and a sickness that encouraged a father to disregard his daughters best interests, and instead allegedly allowed her to be raped, because Allah and Mohammed willed it. A sick man following a sick ideology.
Oh dear, there’s a problem here.
If he hasn’t been convicted then on what grounds did the magistrate refuse bail?
If he was a flight risk or there was a risk of witness intimidation then fair enough. Otherwise it is very disturbing if the magistrate is anticipating the verdict.
This point is nothing to do with bearded saveagery; few people loathe that more than I do.
It is about proper process of criminal law.
Although this is an uncompleted case there is enough evidence to comment on it. I don’t think the magistrate is anticipating the verdict rather commenting on the defendants attitudes. Being a child protection case I’m not surprised that there is a risk of witness intimidation, flight risk and the risk that he would collude with others of his ilk to try to negatively affect the trial.