Would you let a burglar guard your unlocked house?

Would you trust this man to safeguard Britain’s borders?

The answer to the above question is probably not, the risk of allowing a burglar to guard an unlocked house would be too great. Therefore why should anyone trust the Labour Party when it comes to controlling unwanted and unsustainable levels of immigration?

In an effort to stop traditional Labour voters, especially those who live in areas that have been damaged by excessive immigration, from voting for UKIP, the Labour Party is attempting to appear tough on immigration. However, what many people may have noticed is that it was under Labour’s watch that the doors of the country were propped open with no thought about the negative affects on Labour’s traditional working class voters.

Whole towns were filled with Eastern Europeans who although hard working, have changed the character of places. The monstrously damaging ideology of Islam was both pandered to and encouraged by the Labour Party, even to the extent that Labour attempted to forbid criticism of Islam with the 2006 Racial and Religious Hatred Act before it was amended to include a free speech clause by the House of Lords. It was Labour who abolished the ‘Primary Purpose Rule’ that prevented immigrants to the UK using marriage to a British citizen as a back door way of settling in the UK. Labour did everything they possibly could to destroy communities with immigration and yet they now ask us, the British people, to trust them to control immigration. No thanks. Many of us have seen, and some of us have fled from, areas where the existing community both White and Black, has been completely eviscerated by excessive and unwanted levels of immigration. Labour didn’t just allow in people who would be useful to us or those who we had a moral duty to help, they allowed in the worst of the worst. They allowed in the Islamic seditionists, the Eastern European drunks and African welfare spongers and all the while they were doing this the Labour Government of 1997 – 2010 was telling Britons that they were wrong to speak out against excessive immigration and bent the legal system to such an extent that people could be arrested for speaking out against Labour’s nation wrecking policies.

A classic example of Labour’s chutzpah when it comes to immigration can be found in a recent article in the press by a senior member of the Shadow Cabinet. Labour cannot be trusted on immigration we’ve all seen how they behaved regarding this issue just a few years back, there is no guarantee that if elected to office Labour would dump immigration control and get back to wrecking the country and wrecking communities with excessive and unwanted immigration levels.

The Brietbart website is covering Labour’s fake U-turn on immigration matters. Brietbart said:

Labour have joined the fight back against UKIP as they try to claim they will be tough on EU immigration.

In an article for the Mail Online, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Rachel Reeves claimed that Labour would ‘put fairness and responsibility at the heart of Britain’s welfare system by restricting benefits which jobseekers from the EU can claim.’

Writing that she had spoken to ministers from France and Germany about changing the rules on benefits, she said that the current systems was ‘never designed for the levels of migration we are seeing now.’

But this was slammed by opposition parties who point out that it was a Labour government who oversaw eight countries from Eastern Europe have unrestricted access to the UK jobs market and social security system.

At the time Prime Minister Tony Blair used a report from Germany which said that only 13,000 migrants would come to the UK from the new accession countries. This was ridiculed by many eurosceptics and migration groups who said that the draw of Britain’s welfare policies and the language would see hundreds of thousands come.

Ms Reeves said that Labour would ‘stop the absurdity of sending child benefit abroad’, something which was highlighted for years by UKIP and has already been discussed by Mr Cameron and other EU leaders including the German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

In addition, she said Labour would ban jobseekers from claiming out-of-work benefits for two years, a decision which is likely to fall foul of the EU Treaties which take precedence over UK law.

David Cameron has failed to deliver the changes our country needs’ she wrote, adding ‘Labour will work with other countries in Europe to get a better deal for Britain.’

It was Labour who stopped British voters from having a say on firstly the EU Constitution and then the Lisbon Treaty which it replaced. Foreign Secretary David Miliband signed the document which saw huge swathes of power transferred from Westminster to Brussels. Their MPs then voted against a nationwide referendum.

Performing a U-turn over the spiteful rhetoric Labour have used over recent years, Ed Miliband used a speech last week to say it is not ‘prejudiced to worry about the effects of immigration’.

He told the audience ‘A sense of fairness means that we can’t simply allow wages to be undercut. A sense of fairness means that entitlement to benefits should be earned, so you contribute for longer before you claim.’ 

Mr MIliband has tried to make Labour the champion of the ‘Living Wage’ whilst ignoring the fact that uncontrolled immigration and a huge oversupply in the unskilled Labour market meant that the minimum wage became the maximum wage and put a strain on the exchequer as more people relied on working tax credits to make ends meet.”

Read the rest of the Brietbart story here:

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/11/18/Rachel-Reeves-Labour-Tough-on-Migrants

No matter how much Labour may posture and shout about their new immigration policy there are many of us who have experienced both Labour in national and local government and cannot take seriously Labour’s turnaround on immigration. Labour cannot be trusted on immigration just as they cannot be trusted on the economy, education, welfare policy, Europe, healthcare, transport or just about anything else.

If people are thinking of voting Labour because they think that Labour have learned their lesson on immigration then think again. The Britain-destroying Labour party is like a Leopard that cannot change its spots. Ed Miliband’s Labour party will say just about any old rubbish to get people to vote for them and voters should not fall for such an obvious and cynical trick. You would not put a burglar as a guard on your house or put a heroin addict in charge of a pharmacy so why trust Labour when it comes to immigration?


1 Comment on "Would you let a burglar guard your unlocked house?"

  1. Furor Teutonicus | November 19, 2014 at 2:52 pm |

    XX In addition, she said Labour would ban jobseekers from claiming out-of-work benefits for two years, a decision which is likely to fall foul of the EU Treaties which take precedence over UK law.XX

    Why would it?

    We have done that for YEARS here, and indeed, only a couple of weeks ago, it was decided in the European court that it was LEGHAL.

    DON’T believe everything you read in the Mail and Express!

Comments are closed.