Some of the men concerned in the grooming injunction (picture from Sky News)

One of the difficulties that the prosecuting authorities face when attempting to shut down Islamic Rape Gangs is the fact that often the victims and alleged victims of these gangs are too terrified of these Muslim thugs to give evidence against them in a criminal court. Because the criminal courts demand, quite rightly, a very high standard of proof, beyond reasonable doubt, to get a jury to convict an offender, witnesses who are too scared or brainwashed to speak against them will always be a hindrance to conviction of these abusers.

However, a novel way of dealing with those who are suspected of being involved in Islamic Rape Gangs has been found. A civil court in Birmingham has used the lower standards for civil cases, balance of probabilities, to impose an injunction on a group of Muslim men which prevents them from having dealings with young people.

Sky News said:

“Six men from Birmingham who were ordered to stay away from young girls to prevent sexual exploitation have been named after a judge ruled they could be identified.

In an “innovative” legal move to prevent vulnerable children from being sexually exploited, long-term injunctions have been granted to stop the men from approaching “any female under 18” who they are not personally connected to.

Birmingham City Council launched the court proceedings over concerns for the welfare of a 17-year-old girl who is in its care.

At the High Court this week, restrictions were placed on Mohammed Anjam, Naseem Khan, Omar Ahmed, Mohammed Javed, Sajid Hussain and Shah Alam – despite none of the men having been convicted of a crime in relation to the teenager.

However, Mr Justice Keehan said he was satisfied that the girl had been “sexually exploited” on a balance of probabilities basis.

Most of the men have denied any wrongdoing.

One told reporters that the injunctions were “racist”, while another complained of public perceptions “that this is what Asians were doing”.

It was to be expected that these particular men would whine and use the word ‘racist’ as a way of criticising the injunctions, after all lying and shouting ‘racist’ is what we have come to expect from Muslim men in these sort of situations. It’s a case of ‘well they would say that wouldn’t they?’ It is highly unlikely that the politically correct Birmingham City Council would have brought these injunctions unless there was at least some evidence of wrong doing by these men in connection with the alleged victim.

There is a worrying aspect to this case with respect to the attitudes of West Midlands Police who fought to have the identities of these men shrouded in secrecy. It makes one wonder just whose side is WMP on? Are they on the side of the victims or are they more concerned about burnishing their ‘community cohesion’ halo?

Sky News added:

“Meanwhile, West Midlands Police has described the “anti-grooming orders” as “ground-breaking” – even though the force was against naming the men in case their safety was compromised.

Detective Chief Superintendent Danny Long said: “Being found in a hotel room with a child isn’t a crime. Being in a taxi with a child isn’t a crime. Having the number of a vulnerable child in your phone, or on your social media network, isn’t a crime. But these injunctions mean that it is now prohibited for these men.

“If they are found in the company of a vulnerable child by police or children’s services, an application will be made to immediately send them to prison.

“We do not underestimate the impact these injunctions will have on these men, but let us not forget the devastating impact child sexual exploitation has on victims.”

WMP seem to be more interested in protecting the safety of these Savages rather than those who may have been victimised by them. That should tell all readers a fair bit about the priorities for West Midlands Police.

The use of the lower standard of proof to deal with alleged offenders such as these is an indication of both the severity of the problem of Islamic Rape Gangs, and the desperate measures that some local authorities are taking to try to stop them. This may well be a temporary way to deal with the problem of Islamic Rape Gangs, but it is not suitable for the long term. What needs to happen is that more effort is put in by police forces to monitor Britain’s Muslim community and use the criminal law to deal with the gang related sex crimes that Muslims disproportionally commit. However to use the criminal law the police need to be much more proactive in protecting witnesses, victims and their families from attack either by the offenders themselves or by their associates.

This innovative use of the law may at least make some Muslims think twice about targeting vulnerable young women for sex abuse. If they think that they could be hauled up before the courts and have strict conditions placed on their movements, contacts and activities then this may be one weapon that could be useful in attacking the disgusting phenomenon of Islamic rape gangs.

Link

Original story from Sky News

http://news.sky.com/story/1376591/six-men-barred-from-contact-with-young-girls