The logo of the Barnardo’s organisaiton
Many people will have been shocked by the latest incident of Islamic sex crime, the Aylesbury case to strike Britain. Aylesbury is taking its place alongside other British towns that have been afflicted by instances of Islamic sex crime. As with these other places, Rotherham, Rochdale, Tyneside, Birmingham and Oxford, police political correctness and a desire to protect police officers careers from the taint of a ‘racism’ accusation meant that Islamic rapists were not taken off the streets, as they should have been.
It’s pretty obvious to any observer that the police could have done more in this case, at the very least they could have sat down, discussed cases like this and tried to join the dots between Islam, sex criminality, the type of victims and the modus operandi of the offenders. A bit of basic data matching could have told the local police that Aylesbury had an Islamic Rape Gang problem.
However, the subject of this particular post is not the appeasing, Islamopandering and cowardly police, but the actions of the Barnardo’s children’s charity.
A spokesperson for Barnardo’s is alleging that the charity knew eight years ago that there were Islamic Rape Gangs operating in the Aylesbury area, and passed on information to the police. The police, allege Barnardo’s, failed to act on the information.
It’s good that Barnardo’s passed on this data to the police but why didn’t they do more? If Barnardo’s suspected that there was sex gang activity going on in the area why didn’t they speak out when they realised that the police were dragging their heels over Islamic sex crime? If Barnardo’s staff felt they could not speak out earlier because they had to keep in with the authorities to protect the image and income of the charity, what does that tell us about Barnardo’s? Are they still a charity set up to protect and provide for children in danger or have they become a ‘semi-Quango’?
Although I’m aware that child-protection is fenced in with lots of rules and regulations about confidentiality, some necessary and some unnecessary, could not someone have said something to someone about what was going on in Aylesbury?
If Barnardo’s didn’t feel they could make an official announcement of an Islamic Rape Gang problem in Aylesbury then someone could have ‘unofficially’ of course, leaked information to a friendly journalist or other media contact to inform them that Aylesbury had an Islamic Rape Gang problem, but they didn’t. The employees of Barnardo’s must have realised that there was a reluctance on the part of the local police to deal with this problem and because of that they should have taken the matter further either by the charity making a public statement that there was an Islamic Rape Gang problem in the town as well as by referring the matter up to the appropriate minister, the Home Office and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary or even by a ‘quiet word’ somewhere. Barnardo’s could have done this, they are not an organisation that is devoid of contacts in national and local government, media the police and civil service. That Barnardo’s have seemingly not done enough when this case first came to their attention could taint the charity much more than if they had made more of a fuss at the time.
Barnardo’s knew that ‘insufficient action’ had been taken by the authorities to help girls that the charity understood were being sexually exploited by gangs of Muslims. When they got the brush-off from the authorities then Barnardo’s should have started shouting very loudly about the problems that the police were ignoring. That Barnardo’s didn’t go public on the subject of the authorities ignoring Islamic sex crime when they must have realised that this is what was happening, should be a cause of anger. Maybe Barnardo’s is yet another organisation where the fight for justice and for the cause of protecting the innocent is being hampered by the phenomenon of political correctness?
Barnardo’s could have warned people and passed on the knowledge that Muslims were engaged in sex crime in Aylesbury eight years ago, but didn’t, they could have saved many other girls from abuse had they spoken up. That they did not should disgust us and force us to ask, just what are Barnardo’s priorities? Because they certainly don’t seem to be children at risk from Islamic Rape Gangs in Aylesbury.
Link
Brietbart story on how Barnardo’s knew eight years ago that Muslims were raping their way round Aylesbury.
