There has been a growing knowledge, and an increasingly angry mood among many people I speak to about the double standards that seem to be applied to sentences following criminal trials where Muslims are involved. Muslims seem to be getting away with lesser sentences compared to that which the majority of citizens would get for similar offences. In Britain if you are a non-Muslim you can be gaoled for putting bacon on a mosque door, or arrested for quoting Winston Churchill, but if you are a Muslim you can plan terror, or try to get to Syria for jihad and courts will treat you leniently.
Here are two stories that illustrate that double standard or how Muslims are not paying the full penalties for their crimes and are being treated rather too leniently by the criminal justice system.
In the first instance of the courts being far too lenient towards Muslims involved in jihad or similar activities we see a woman who has made several failed bids and one successful attempt to reach the jihad zone of Syria using false documentation, manage to avoid prison. The reason that this woman jihad fan was given a non-custodial sentence was that she was to be ‘given a chance to rebuild her life with her young son’. I have to ask if this same chance to rebuild a family life would be given to non-Muslim who had campaigned against the problems that Islam is bringing to the UK? My guess is probably not. They’d probably be doing a considerable stretch inside and the social services would have taken their child into care because of the political views of the parent or parents.
Here’s how the BBC reported this particular story:
A woman who tried to use her twin sister’s passport to travel to Syria has avoided jail so she can rebuild her relationship with her son, aged two.
Jamila Henry, from Walthamstow in east London, was deported from Turkey and arrested by counter-terror police at Luton Airport on 19 March.
The 22-year-old pleaded guilty to possessing her sister’s passport “with improper intent” at the Old Bailey.
She was given a 12-month sentence, suspended for two years.
Henry was also ordered to do 40 days’ rehabilitation activity.
Judge Christopher Moss QC said he had not jailed her so that she could rebuild her relationship with her son, and for her to pursue her ambition to train as a midwife or nurse.
The court heard that Henry made two abortive attempts to travel to Syria in 2014, but was twice stopped at Heathrow and Luton airports.
Her mobile phone was found to have images of people with guns and the Islamic State group flag and salute.
Henry then succeeded in travelling via Dover and Belgium to Syria, the court was told, and when stopped at Stansted Airport on her return with her son admitted as much.
In March, she borrowed her sister Jalila’s passport, claiming she needed it for identification to pawn jewellery.
The court was told that Henry, a “shy and quiet” woman, changed her appearance and wore western clothes to look more like her “outspoken and confident” sister.
She took the coach from Victoria Station to Brussels and was detained in Ankara, Turkey, on 16 March.
When her London home was searched, police found Islamic State group propaganda on her laptop and mobile phone.
The court heard that Henry pleaded guilty because she wanted to visit Syria, not for military reasons but to help suffering children.
Read the source of this story here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-33740546
I think that we can disregard the ‘helping suffering children’ line, it’s probably just yet more filthy taqiyya.
This woman is showing blatant support for the Islamofascists of ISIS yet she isn’t jailed and is still allowed to have a family life, how can this be called ‘justice’? A non Muslim who did something similar to this for a different cause, would find that their liberty would be removed, their property would be impounded by the government, and their children would be shipped off, re-educated and adopted out. This is a travesty of justice, she needs to do time, she needs to be properly punished. All sentences like this do is encourage more Bearded Savages to go on jihad holidays to various war zones.
The second example of giving the extremist Muslim too much of a break comes from the case of Afsor Ali a former London Underground security worker who was convicted at the Central Criminal Court in London of possessing terrorist materials and gaoled for 31 months, but was out in 11.
Here’s how the London Evening Standard newspaper reported this terrorist supporting Tube security guard’s release:
“A former London Tube worker who was jailed for terror offences is back on the streets of London after serving just 11 months of a 31-month sentence, it has been revealed.
Afsor Ali, 28, was convicted of possessing terrorist material after a trial at the Old Bailey last year.
During his sentencing, the ex-London Underground security worker was told by a judge: “It is absolutely plain that you are an extremist and you do support terrorism”.
But now it has emerged that the Ali, who has links to hate preacher Anjem Choudary, was recently granted parole despite once being deemed a serious security threat.
An investigation by the Daily Star on Sunday found he had been given permission to live in a west London bail hostel for the rest of his sentence.
The newspaper obtained photographs of him waiting for a District Line train surrounded by oblivious commuters.
Just ahead of his trial in August 2014, Ali attempted to flee to France by Eurostar after obtaining a stolen passport, but police caught up with him and he was re-arrested.
It was later revealed in court that he had been sharing extremist messages on YouTube under the alias Asad Ullah.
In the videos, he warned of a terrorist attack during Prince William and Kate’s wedding and called for a Burn American Flag Day.
Jurors heard how he described the 9/11 terrorist attacks as “a historic event”.
He was also found in possession of a transcript of a speech by Omar Bakri, dubbed the Tottenham Ayatollah, which appeared to justify suicide bombings.
Police also discovered a copy of al-Qaeda magazine Inspire and terrorist manual “39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad” on his computers and MP3 player after raids at addresses in east London.
Ali’s activities were investigated after he was arrested outside the US embassy on December 2, 2011, while leading a violent protest against drone strikes in Pakistan.
He denied three counts of possessing terrorist material but was convicted at the Old Bailey.”
Read the source of this story here:
Here we have a completely unrepentant extremist, who has been associated with Anjem Choudhary and who approved of the 9/11 attacks, yet he walks free after only 11 months. Again how can such a sentence be described as ‘justice’?
Both these cases are ones where there was actual provable support for terrorism including support for the 9/11 murderers and ISIS, yet they are either given a non-custodial or are released from gaol ridiculously early. This is wrong and it’s treating Islamic terror supporters much too softly. The punishments in cases like these are so often now not fitting the crime. We need to see an end of such pandering sentences like these, we really do.
