“This way lads and tazers at the ready. We’ve been told that there’s someone round here who doesn’t think that Islam is a religion of peace”

An excellent article from the Crimebodge website containing yet more information that Britain’s police forces would dearly wish the average civilian didn’t know.

It is plain for many to see that too many British police forces have become corrupt and have become all too willing to turn a blind eye when members of minorities commit crimes or engage in anti-social behaviour. This blind eye turning is partially down to individual officers not wanting a ‘racism’ tag on their employment records, but sometimes, such as the outright pandering to Islam that we’ve seen in forces like West Midlands, such appeasement is ‘policy’.

Because so many of our police forces and senior police officers are more than willing to behave like Quislings where Islam is concerned, it is likely to become increasingly often that the police will turn their attention onto those who criticise Islam or Islamic organisations and individuals. Sometimes this negative police attention aimed at patriots will take the form of arrests and charges, but a more subtle and less transparent way of the police frightening or silencing those who speak up is the Police Harassment Warning (PHW).

Here is an imagined scenario of how the police may use a PHW against a counterjihadist or a patriot. Suppose a counterjihadist discovered that their local Muslim group had been inviting speakers of an extremist nature or was running a Shariah Court. Now also suppose that our imaginary counterjihadist gets involved in campaigning against the Shariah Court and the stream of ‘kill the Jews’ and ‘kill the gays’ type speakers at the mosque. With the PHW system the offending and offensive Islamic organisation or individual can go to the police and say: ‘That Mr Jones is an Islamophobe and is running a hate campaign against me’. The police, being the lazy bastards that they so often are, will not take the time to establish whether or not the local mendacious grievance mongering taqiyya artist is correct, but will act as if the complainants story is 100% true. The police will then issue a PHW to the counterjihadist whom the Muslims had complained about.

The person issued the PHW cannot put his or her side of the story and the police may press or try to coerce or frighten the subject into signing the PHW. This is similar to how a caution works which is when you sign it, you are in effect admitting guilt, and the PHW can stay on your police record for years. As Crimebodge advises, if the police turn up on your doorstep with one of thes PHW’s then DON’T sign it and never let the police into your home.

Here’s what Crimebodge has said about these pernicious instruments of police bullying:

“Police harassment warnings are a one sided, and often dishonest account of a grievance between two parties. Not only do the police commonly hand them out without ever bothering to confirm the truth of the allegations, they then remain on record where they can cause damage at a later date, preventing you from getting a job or used as evidence to prosecute you.

They are in effect a verdict without trial.

In this article, we give you some important advice on how to deal with and challenge these poison pen letters…

What are harassment warnings?

Harassment warnings – or PINs as the police refer to them (Police Information Notices) are formal written notices given to people who have been accused of causing another alarm and distress. They contain an account of the incident as alleged by the complainant and a warning that any further incidents could result in arrest and prosecution.

Each harassment warning contains details of alleged conduct which can range from exaggeration, wrongful accusation through to outright fantasy.  

The police issue PIN notices – or so they claim – to serve as a ‘reminder’ to stay away from the complainant. The notice will often conclude with blithe assurances that the document isn’t an indication of guilt. However, these warnings become a permanent record on police computers and can be used and disclosed to your detriment.

These PHW’s are exactly how Crimebodge describes them and that is a ‘verdict without trial’.

Crimebodge then went on to speak out how such PHW’s are counterproductive as they encourage those who’ve been given them to make counter allegations against the original complainant.

The reason that harassment warnings are so ineffective is not only do they often defame innocent people, they also encourage MORE harassment warnings. Those receiving them often make counter allegations simply out of spite for having received a notice themselves. In which case, the police will often blindly serve it, becoming a spiteful pawn in a vicious circle of he-said she-said.

However, in a disagreement between two parties, the police will commonly favour whoever makes the first complaint. If they do bother to check the records in advance of issuing a notice, the mere existence of a harassment notice against somebody’s name is usually all the the evidence the police need to decide who is the victim and who is the aggressor.

The most interesting part at least for me of the Crimebodge piece was the advice on what to do should you be presented with one of these documents. The advice in this case is to never ever sign one. If the police hand one to you and you do not sign it then it is not a proof of admission and can’t be used in evidence against you in any future court case.

What is vitally important for people to remember is that the police cannot force anybody to sign for one of these PHW’s. Crimebodge said:

“Furthermore, the police cannot insist you sign for it as a condition of it being handed over. If they insist, it can render the document useless as future evidence as well as give you a valid complaint against the officer concerned. “

Read the whole Crimebodge article here:

http://crimebodge.com/harassment-warnings-how-to-challenge-them/

The Crimebodge piece then goes on to outline how the PHW can be challenged and what to do to get the data removed from the records if the police have exceeded their powers or have acted unlawfully.

It is only a matter of time before various police forces (especially those like West Midlands and Bedfordshire who have appalling records for Islamopandering) start to dish these notices out like sweeties to anybody who shows any dislike for the Islamic religion of rape and murder. These notices represent the sort of cheap tick-box policing that senior officers love. It also means that when they have ‘consultations’ with Islamic community leaders, the officers can polish their Islamopanderer badge and say to their audience ‘This force is committed to stamping out Islamophobia and to this end we have issued ‘x’ number of warning notices to Islamophobes’.

I expect to see police using these PHW’s to try to shut down criticism of Muslim groups and Muslim individuals and it is very important that people know what to do when they are faced with police officers on their doorstep demanding that they sign one of these notices.