Islamic rapist Abdul Fulat

Now when I was a professional media type I attended and observed many a court trial, some big, some small, some memorable and some I’ve completely forgotten about. Along with the normal to-ing and fro-ing of a trial, I’ve seen a few character witness statements. Some of them I’ve found believable or pathetic or desperate or obviously cajoled out of the witness by the defendant out of a sense of familial or friendly loyalty. I’ve also seen character statements that are outrageous bullshit but I’ve never seen one as outrageously bullshitty as this case which has been featured on the Brietbart website.

Surely a character witness statement should have some aspect of it or some part of it rooted in truth? How can anybody, no matter close they are to the offender use the words ‘he is a man of great principles’.

Breitbart said:

A rapist who committed a degrading and humiliating attack on a vulnerable Leeds prostitute was described by his imam, family and friends as caring, supportive and a “man of great principles.”

The letters of reference written on rapist Adbul Fulat’s behalf by an imam, family members and friends were presented to Leeds Crown Court by way of mitigation before he was sent to prison with a sentence of eight years, reports the Yorkshire Evening Post. The 48-year-old rapist was also found guilty of supplying crack cocaine.

Having earlier been drinking and smoking crack cocaine Fulat later subjected his victim, a prostitute he picked up in Leeds’ red light district, to a terrifying ordeal which lasted one and a half hours.

The woman joined Fulat in the car in the Holbeck area of Leeds on the night of September 25 last year. She was paid £60 and taken to Middleton Grove, Beeston.

Fulat first persuaded his victim to smoke some crack. He then began to discuss having sex with children in what Judge Tom Bayliss said was part of his “attempts to shock her, to control her and to degrade her.”

There then followed a prolonged and violent sex attack which ended with Fulat demanding back the £60 he paid earlier. Arrested after the event, he refused to confess resulting in his trial.

As well as being jailed for eight years, Fulat is now the subject of a sexual harm prevention order which bans him from entering the red light district where he picked up the victim.

The letters of support described Fulat as caring, supportive and a “man of great principles”, however, after the case Detective Inspector David Roberts, of Leeds District CID, said:

“Fulat put the victim through an appalling ordeal after targeting her as someone who was vulnerable and involved in sex work.

“His actions show that he is clearly an individual who presents a threat to the wider community and we are pleased with the significant sentence he has received.”

Read the original source here:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/15/imam-friends-described-rapist-man-great-principles/

How on earth could any sane person call Abdul Fulat refer to him as a ‘man of great principles’? This man picked up a prostitute then frightened her by talking about having sex with her children then subjected her to a horrific attack. This savage then refused to confess or plead guilty to his crimes thereby subjecting the victim and others to the stress of a trial. There is no way that this worthless savage could or should be called, ‘a man of great principles’, unless the ‘principles’ he is known for are the hateful, misogynistic and violent principles of Islam that is.

This appalling savage should be doing life or dangling from a rope, instead he gets a mere 8 years of which he will be unlucky if he serves more than 6.

This is the sort of savagery that we’ve imported along with the ideology of Islam. Still think that all religions are the same, because I don’t.

Please note: I was originally going to call this worthless, meatsack rapist a ‘Simian’ until someone pointed out that to compare monkeys, with this sorry example of the Common Islamo-Rapist  species, would be doing a gross injustice to certain members of the Simian order of animals, and would have been insulting to innocent Howler,Capuchin and Squirrel Monkeys, Marmosets and Gibbons.