Many people in Britain are getting more and more shocked, and more and more angry about the rise of Islamopandering in the UK. We are seeing our housing departments and planning departments, prioritisng Muslim’s demands, because in the Left’s eyes, Muslims are ‘an oppressed minority’ (although the Christians and Yazidis and Jews of the Middle East, having suffered under Muslims, may disagree on that one), who deserve special considerations.
We may be perturbed, and may grumble, at the news of yet another Mohammed being charged or convicted of some god-awful sex crime against a child or a young woman. We may feel frustrated when an Abdul or some hostile jihad supporting baby-machine dressed in a burkha gets housed ahead of those in more need. We may even feel justifiable hostility towards the constant demands for special treatment by Muslims, often accompanied by the vague or not so vague threat of violence or disturbance by Muslims should those demands not be met.
In nearly all these cases the State has pandered to Muslims and their whines something chronic. The State did this even though the negative effects were becoming more and more obvious. Our police forces hid and did not act upon the information that there was a huge epidemic of sex crime committed by Muslims occurring in the UK. Leftists in the Civil Service, local government and the, often Government funded, Third Sector have all helped to create a situation where Muslim whines and demands for housing or welfare or whatever are met, even if it means ‘de-prioritising’ those Britons who have actually paid in for the housing or other service, over many decades previously. To be Muslim in Britain today seems to mean never having to say ‘please’ or ‘thank you’ or ‘I’m grateful to be here’ or ‘I’ll wait my turn thank you’ or even it seems, having to obey the Law or respect British customs. To be Muslim in Britain also means that you never have to say ‘I’m sorry’ for the destruction, violence and mess that Islam makes wherever it settles or has control, including in the United Kingdom. In addition to the never ending demands of Islamic leaders and groups, on top of that, there are far too many non-Muslim Islamopanderers who will cater to Muslims every whim. In effect they are saying to Muslims ‘there, there, Mr Abdul sir, nurse will make the horribly offensive pig/Jew/Christian/Hindu/service person/gay or whatever, go away’. Instead of the Islamopanderers government and third sector organisations should instead be slapping the Muslims down a bit, and saying ‘put up, shut up or sod off’.
Islamopandering is a problem that is deeply set within Britain’s public services and it’s long past time that there was a purge of these Islamopanderers from them. However, that will have to wait until the politicians who see no wrong in pandering are changed for those who see the dangers that we all face. These Islamopanderers who support the idea of ‘diversity’, should also be reminded that there is no greater enemy of the idea of ‘diversity’ on this planet than Islam. Islam is an intolerant monothought ideology that perceives diversity of thought, belief, sexuality and ideas in the same way as a vampire would treat garlic. If a person supports Islam, even as part of a diversity project or policy, then they are not supporting real diversity in any way shape or form.
Recently there has been a case which shows that the Islamopandering in our public services is becoming more and more visible to the public. I think that many people will agree with me that moving a British serviceman out of sight so that the Muslims are not offended is probably one of the most open and obvious bit of Islamopandering I’ve seen for a while.
According to reports in three British newspapers, The Sun, the Daily Mirror and the Daily Mail an RAF man seeking treatment for an injury at the Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital in Margate, Kent was moved to a side ward in case the sight of him in his uniform inflamed passions among what were termed ‘other cultures’.
The Daily Mail said:
“An RAF sergeant who has served in Iraq and Afghanistan was moved out of a hospital waiting room because staff feared his uniform would upset people from different cultures, it was reported.
Aircraft engineer Mark Prendeville’s treatment was condemned as ‘horrifying’ by military figures and Air Force veterans – but follows a string of incidents in recent years where service personnel were snubbed because of their uniform.
Sergeant Prendeville, 38, was taken to the A&E department at Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital in Margate, Kent, after chemicals from a fire extinguisher got in to his eyes during a training exercise.
He was then taken to an empty corner of the waiting room before being moved behind a corner by hospital staff, The Sun reported.
In an explanation to his family, hospital workers were said to have claimed ‘they didn’t want to upset people’ because they ‘have lots of different cultures coming in’.
Sergeant Prendeville’s father, Jim, said: ‘Mark was moved because of his uniform – he was told that twice.
The words they used were: “We’ve lots of cultures coming in”.
‘Mark was quite annoyed, but he’s a quiet lad and didn’t want to cause a fuss.’
Mr Prendeville added: ‘He didn’t care about the burns, he felt worse about how he was treated. I was absolutely disgusted when I heard. I don’t know what is so offensive about a uniform.’
Veterans and military figures condemned Sergeant Prendeville’s treatment. Former Chief of the Air Staff Sir Michael Graydon described the incident as ‘disappointing’.
It goes beyond disappointing, it’s downright disgusting. Aircraft Engineer Prendeville’s treatment could be seen as an indication of how far political correctness and it’s bastard child Islamopandering, has infested the National Health Service. The NHS is our health service and it should not be running scared of offending other cultures, in this case presumably Islam, by moving a British serviceman out of the way. Of course there are others who doubt the extent of the problems of Islamopandering or who dislike the sources of the story are proposing alternative theories such as the serviceman was being moved for his own safety and it’s their right to bring out alternative explanations, it’s just I don’t agree with them. The hospital attempted to blame the incident on previous occurrences of civilians clashing with service personnel. According to a quote from The Sun posted on the Digital Spy forum, the hospital spokesperson:
………apologised to Sgt Prendeville for “any embarrassment”.
“A member of the armed forces in uniform attended our A&E and was asked by a member of staff if he wanted to sit inside the department rather than the waiting room,” he told The Sun.
“This employee was acting in good faith because previously, there had been an altercation between a member of the public and a different member of the armed forces in uniform.”
Do you believe the spokesperson? I want to believe what they say when they state that the employee was acting in good faith, but I’ve seen so much Islamopandering of a similar nature in our public services, that I’m not prepared to give the hospital spokesperson the benefit of the doubt on this one. There may well have been an unofficial or semi-official policy of not upsetting the Islamic bearded savages by making sure that the said savages are not allowed to get a glimpse of a British service person. There could well have been incidents where Muslims have kicked off in similar circumstances which led the hospital to opt for a quiet life, the path of appeasement and of least resistance, by having a policy of shuffling service people out of the way so as not to upset the savages.
The hospital is trying to paint this as an aberration caused by previous ‘member of the public’ incidents in their contacts so far with the Press, but the fact that two separate members of staff told Aircraft Engineer Prendeville that he was being moved because ‘other cultures come in’, is making this excuse look very thin indeed. This, sadly, does not look like cock-up but more like a deliberate policy put in place to keep the peace by stopping Islamic savages kicking off at the sight of a British service uniform.
If anything sums up what has gone tragically wrong with the NHS because of its dangerous flirtation with multiculturalism and appeasement, it is incidents like this one.
A British service person should not be shuffled off round the corner to take him out of the gaze of members of ‘other cultures’. If these ‘other cultures’ are so offended by the sight of a British service person, then maybe they should leave Britain and travel to a country which will not offend them so.
Muslims do very well out of the British National Health service,even though many of them are dole claimants and therefore do not pay a penny towards it. The NHS treats them when they are injured, takes care of their women when pregnant, takes care of them when they are sick, and provides free treatment for the thousands of damaged and disabled inbred offspring of Islamic cousin marriage. Oh yes, Britain’s Muslim guests are just about the very last people who should be complaining about the sight of a British serviceman in their local A and E.
The hospital and the employee went out of their way not to say the word ‘Muslim’ but it’s pretty plain what they mean when they say ‘other cultures’. We all know who these ‘other cultures’ are that are likely to complain about a British serviceman don’t we? It won’t be the Jews, it won’t be the Pentacostalists, it won’t be the Hindus or the Sikhs and it won’t be the Buddhists. Of course, it will be the Islamic savages that will be ‘offended’ at the sight in a British hospital of a British service person. Is anybody surprised about this? With Muslims it would be easier to make a list of the things that they are NOT offended by, such as child rape and child marriage, slavery, violence and misogyny, because they are offended by just about everything that we in the more freedom orientated countries hold dear.
Just when you think that our Quislings in the public service could not get more appeasing along comes a story like this to prove to me that these Quislings can only get worse as time goes on.
Links
Digital spy discussion on this story, including the statement from the hospital management
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2108039&page=2
Daily Mail version of the story
Also check out this raving Leftie who feels that the service person shouldn’t have been there and referred to him as a ‘c**t’
She then had one of her friends pop onto the time line and comfort her by saying
“Queen Molly @QueenMollyBones 22m
22 minutes ago
@stavvers I don’t agree with what you said but I am so sorry about all transmisogynistic bullshit turning up as replies. Hope you’re okay.”
https://twitter.com/stavvers/status/647737072468525056
As an aside I’d like to say that the @stavvers is an example of all that is wrong with the LGBT Left. It has become a parody of itself, it is now a club for the politically mental. Many of the gay men I have met in my life want little to do with the achingly far left fraggles like Stavvers and her crew. To be frank I’m a little less worried about the ‘transmisogynistic’ criticism that stavvers has got, and am a little more concerned about the NHS pandering to the sort of culture that wants to chuck gay men off of tall buildings, as punishment for being gay.
Here’s another example of NHS and third sector wasting resources on Britain’s Islamic guests.
Bowing down to the religion of peace in order to keep the peace is not acceptable.
If savages kick of with millitary personal, security should deal with it ,calling the local islamo pandering police force if necessary.
The problem is that the local Islamopandering police force just as likely to recommend moving the service person so the savage doesn’t get ‘offended’.
Might I suggest you describe this pandering by the term “kuffarphobia”? http://4freedoms.com/
Anyone who does anything to promote islam or make observance of it easier, is a kuffarphobe. Islam is, from its very roots, a fear and violent hatred of kuffar, those who do not observe islamic ordinances.
Every action to make observance of islam easier, is an action against non-muslims.