Some alleged ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’. Now I wonder which ones are the rapists and the terrorists or the thieves or the dole ponces or the child abusers or the one who encourages sedition? I can’t tell – Can you?

A few weeks ago this blog covered the appalling story of a group of ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’ accused of raping a young woman at a residence in Kent. I said at the time that this case, which I hoped would be a wake up call for the ‘Refugees Welcome’ crowd, would be interesting once it came to court. It has indeed proved interesting with the hearing turning into something of a bunfight.

The Daily Mail has covered this court case and some of their coverage is reproduced below. As is usual policy for this blog, the original quoted text is in italics and my comments are in plain text.

The Daily Mail said:

“Two asylum seekers openly argued with a judge yesterday as they were accused of taking part in the gang rape of a schoolgirl.

The young men wept loudly, held their heads in their hands and gestured at the court as they protested their innocence.

Of course they will protest their innocence, they’d do that even if they were guilty as sin. Not surprised at all to see them unable to behave in court.

Judge Charles Macdonald QC was forced to intervene because of the noise, telling them: ‘You will not speak in the dock.’

Sounds like it was a right bunfight.

The pair are accused of being among a group of men who took turns to rape an ‘extremely vulnerable’ 18-year-old girl.

This poor woman sounds like the usual sort of target for Islamic rapists.

The attack shocked veteran police officers in a Kent town where they were living as Syrian refugees in a taxpayer-funded hostel.

I bet it shocked Kent police. However, once the shock wore off it was full speed ahead with the obfuscation and Islamopandering for Kent Police as the Daily Mail said in an appendix to their article that Kent police had been extremely uncooperative with regards to this case. Kent Police were said to have ‘wilfully obstructed’ representatives of the Press with regards to this case and have even been alleged to have tried to hide details of the defendants from journalists. In the appendix the Daily Mail said:

“Police were accused of ‘wilful obstruction’ yesterday for refusing to reveal the identities of the two suspected gang rapists.

Kent Police repeatedly blocked requests to identify the men so reporters could cover the case.

Instead, they referred inquiries to Maidstone Crown Court, where officials also refused to reveal who they were and when they would appear.

Media lawyer David Banks said last night it was an appalling example of police being ‘inexplicably and wilfully obstructive’.

He added: ‘Were it not for the determination of the Press to cover these cases the public would be left in the dark.’

The defendants cannot be identified under a temporary court order that assumes they are children, but their names were on a list of dozens of defendants in the courthouse lobby.

There is no ban on informing reporters following their case.Police declined to comment.

This is a significant and worrying development. This looks very much like the police trying to hide from the public the progress of this case, probably for the sort of ‘community cohesion’ reasons as played a part in the cover up of the Islamic Rape Gangs in Rotherham and elsewhere. Well done to the Daily Mail and others in the media for highlighting this latest example of a police force turning the Islamopandering up to 11.

But their case quickly descended into chaos yesterday as questions emerged over exactly how old they are and whether they should be treated as juveniles.

Before one of the men could answer questions about his age on oath, he smashed his head into the wall of a cell during a break and was taken to hospital.

As I suspected when this case was first highlighted, there is a strong chance that one of more of the accused may have been lying about their age and probably much else besides.

As a result neither of the men can be named under laws designed to protect the identities of juvenile defendants until a further hearing.

If there is one case that shows up the problems with the provisions both in the Children and Young Persons Act and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child that prevent or discourage the naming of alleged juveniles then this is it. You can make a reasonable case for not publicly naming some first offender accused of shoplifting out of a supermarket whilst trying to impress members of their peer group, but it is very difficult to justify hiding the identity of juveniles when offences like this are alleged. Pretend juveniles from the ‘refugee’ community are going to put a lot of stress on our courts and our social services systems. I am horrified to think that some of these fake juvenile alleged ‘Syrians’ could be being housed in children’s homes and foster homes where they will without doubt put British children at risk of physical or sexual attack.

This is despite the fact that one of them is being held in an adult prison after magistrates ruled he is in fact 18.

In that case this person should be named. If the prosecution and the police are arguing that identifying the 18 year old will assist in a jigsaw identification of the other alleged juvenile alleged rapists, then that is a seriously tenuous reason. This is because it’s unlikely that these alleged Syrian rape suspects are unlikely to have been in the UK long enough to become known enough by the wider community for this concern about jigsaw identification to matter one bit. Personally I’m in favour of dumping most if not all of the identification prohibitions in the Children and Young Persons Act, I feel that it is an insult to the idea of having justice not only done, but to be seen to have been done.

The case concerns the appalling attack of a girl at the refugee hostel in Gillingham, Kent, on the night of Halloween.

She and a male friend met a group of young men in the street and were persuaded to go back to their home. But when she arrived she was allegedly dragged to an upstairs bedroom, stripped naked and repeatedly raped by up to four men as others watched.

The lesson from this case that girls and young women should take is never, ever, ever go anywhere with men in general that you don’t know and trust, and give an especially wide berth to Muslim men. This is because Muslim men seem to have a much higher level of ‘rapeyness’ when compared to men from other groups. I suppose that if a person is brought up in a culture that sees women as property at worst and at best a second class citizen, as many Muslim men are, then it is liable to make the individual a bit more rapey than people brought up in cultures, like that of Britain, that respects women.

She finally escaped after punching and head butting the men as her friend ran into the street and persuaded a neighbour to intervene.

Good for her for allegedly fighting back. I’ve got the nasty feeling that a lot more of us are going to be forced to fight back against other examples of these ‘refugees’ as time goes on.

Both of the defendants in the dock at Maidstone Crown Court yesterday are asylum seekers who claim to be 17-year-old refugees from Syria.

They would say that wouldn’t they.

But the court heard how immigration officials have judged that one of them is in fact from Egypt.

Oh what a surprise – not.

He faced deportation next month. Wearing jogging bottoms and sweatshirts, the two defendants appeared confused by the proceedings.

So why was this failed asylum seeking chancer still on the streets, why wasn’t he safely back in Cairo? ‘Confused by the proceedings’! Confused by being in a civilised society more like.

They are both represented by a barrister and a lawyer and an Arabic interpreter sat in between them throughout the 90-minute hearing.

Of course you can rest assured that the lawyers and the interpreters will more than likely have been paid for by the British taxpayer. I would bet that the ‘refugees welcome’ crowd would be unlikely to be reimbursing the taxpayer for the cost of this crime allegedly committed by their ‘Syrian’ pets?

A social worker from Kent County Council was also present in court, who explained that the pair have been repeatedly assessed by youth workers and immigration officials.

More cost, and equally importantly social services resources being diverted to deal with these imported savages and not for a more worthwhile purpose.

The age of the defendant who injured himself is recorded differently by police, the prisons and the courts – with his year of birth being either 1997 or 1998, the court heard.

The age blurring sounds might suspect to me, as it will probably seem to others. In fact this whole case sounds like a mixture of chaos and malevolence. There has been chaos the court and malevolence on the part of the police by attempting to hide this case from the Press.

The ‘refugees welcome’ arseholes really need to read stories like this as this is what ordinary working class communities up and down the country have to put up with from these alleged ‘refugees’. On top of existing Islamic problems such as rape gangs, terrorism, sedition, drugs and violence, the ordinary Briton, especially those trapped in some of Britain’s must appalling Islam created hell holes, are now going to be landed with a bunch of rapey Syrians. This is not right.

Those of us who said ‘turn the refugees away, and if necessary turn the guns on them’ are sadly being proved right. Terrorists have mingled with the ‘refugees’ and many of these ‘refugees’ themselves are the sort of people we should never be allowing into the UK in the first place. The ‘refugees welcome’ types really need to have their nose rubbed into the sort of turds that they are assisting in bringing into the United Kingdom.

Links

Here’s one for the ‘refugees welcome’ crowd and hopefully it may make them think.

https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2015/11/06/heres-another-one-for-the-refugees-welcome-crowd-lets-hope-that-it-will-make-them-pause-and-think/

Daily Mail court report

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3327975/Case-against-Syrian-refugees-accused-gang-raping-teenage-girl-descends-chaos-argue-wail-dock.html