Those of us who have had the misfortune to have once had to live in areas that are controlled by a Labour/Islam alliance, have sometimes been accused by Labour members and supporters of hyperbole, when I have said ‘Labour is the Islam Party’. ‘But’, they say, ‘the Labour Party is for all working people, it’s just that in some areas a lot of Muslims support Labour’. But it’s more than that. It’s a symbiotic relationship where Labour appease Muslims and the Muslims get the vote out for Labour by hook or by crook.

Another way that Labour supporters have deflected criticism of their party’s very close association with Islam is to make false comparisons with other instances of communal voting, such as Catholics voting for a Catholic candidate or Jews voting for a Jewish candidate. I normally tell my critics that they are comparing apples with oranges as the overall effect of such anomalies is normally very small and confined to a mere handful of seats. Even then, the effect of this sort of communal voting doesn’t have a massive effect on the greater picture, unlike the highly negative wider effects of Islamic communal voting.

For example: The Stamford Hill area of North East London sometimes votes Conservative because the Haredi Jewish community are in general socially and economically conservative. But that doesn’t have much of an impact on the democratic rights of others in the wider borough, Hackney, as the wider electorate returns a Labour council. In that case there is a communal vote effect but it doesn’t have much of a wider effect.

The Labour/Islamic alliance which we see in other places like Newham, Waltham Forest, Rotherham and now Redbridge in East London, does on the other hand have a negative effect. This is because the Islamic interests that keep Labour in power need continual appeasement, often with large dollops of public money, in order to keep them onside. This appeasement and favouring of Islamic interests makes life unpleasant for non Muslims which is a factor in then driving them away. This entrenches the new ‘Islamic character’ of the area, further corrupting the politics. The London Borough of Newham which I mentioned earlier is a classic example of Islam taking over the local political scene and driving the non-Muslim Britons out. At the last census Newham had less than 18% of indigenous Britons left in the area, living in an Islamic craphole had caused all those who could get out, to get out.

What the Labour Party have done goes way, way beyond an issue of local communal voting, what Labour have done is approach Britain’s Muslims with an attitude of abject appeasement. Labour believe that if they appease and pander to Muslims enough, then Labour will be guaranteed a vote bank that would be simply unchallengeable. This unchallengeable vote bank becomes even more powerful when you factor in Islamic voting practices, such as the whipped mosque vote where Imams and ‘community leaders’ tell their followers to vote this way or that, or where biraderi tribal practices play a major part in electoral corruption.

It’s this ability to acquire an unchallengeable and sometimes dishonest vote bank of Muslims that keeps Labour from recognising the dangers of appeasing Islam. It continues to appease because the payback looks so good, at least until those representatives chosen by the party get de-selected or sidelined in order to make way for a local Muslim headman. It is also this unchallengeable vote bank that prevents non-Muslim insurgent parties or other mainstream parties from defeating Labour in these areas. No matter how much the Tories or the Lib Dems or whoever get their vote out, no matter how sound the anti-Labour organisation on the ground, other parties will never beat the bent Muslim vote bank. It is partly because of the Muslim bent vote bank that it is nigh on impossible to prise Labour out of places like Newham or Waltham Forest.

It is also one explanation why Labour were not politically gutted at the last General Election, as they deserved to be, in some of their northern strongholds that have been adversely affected by the huge amount of crime and disorder committed by Labour’s Islamic ‘pets’. How else can it be explained that even after over a thousand rapes committed by Rotherham’s Muslims in Rotherham did that town elect a creature such as Ms Sarah Champion to be their MP. Labour should have been electorally punished for their wilful lack of action over Islamic Rape Gangs but the fact that they were not appears highly mysterious.

Although figures for the 2015 election in Rotherham are not yet available from the Electoral Commission, there is no doubt that postal votes (probably bent Islamic postal votes) may have played a significant role in electing Sarah Champion,just as it did for Denis MacShane back in the 2010 election. In the 2010 election out of a total of 38,348 votes cast, a staggering 14,246 were postal votes. How many of those votes were bent, I do not know, but I would assume, based on what has happened in the past and other Islamic areas elsewhere, that a lot of these postal votes may well have been bent in some way.

Labour is morphing without shame, or regret, and with a high degree of cynicism, into a de facto ‘Muslim Party of Britain’. That fact, really should make us both angry and sad, angry at what has happened and sad at what has been lost. Labour is going through a transmogrification, from a party based on the interests of Britain’s working class, to being the party of the followers of an alien, violent, intolerant ideology.

It is difficult not to come to the conclusion that Labour is now the Islam party, This conclusion can be arrived at by looking not just on what voting blocs Labour are targeting or by the tolerance of massive electoral fraud that is beneficial to Labour, but also by examining Labour’s willingness to appease Islam with things like gender segregated meetings and also, as in the case of Stephen Timms, MP’s concentrating on interests beneficial to the ideology of Islam.

Labour parliamentarians, members and supporters no longer seem to be ashamed of the pandering to Islam that their party engages in, especially the more outrageous examples such as gender segregated meetings or turning a blind eye to the rape of thousands of British girls by Muslims. Therefore, it is difficult not to come to the point of view that if Labour members and others are not condemning the sort of misogyny, crime and corruption that goes on then they condone it because it benefits the Labour/Islam political alliance.

Having lived in and observed the politics of a particular Labour borough for a number of years, I can now honestly say that Labour are no longer the party of the working person. They are the party of Islam, of that I can no longer have any doubt whatsoever.

Links

Labour hold yet another segregated meeting

http://order-order.com/2015/11/30/labour-hold-another-segregated-rally/

Electoral Commission data for Rotherham 2010 Election

http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/find-information-by-subject/elections-and-referendums/past-elections-and-referendums/uk-general-elections/2010-uk-general-election-results/rotherham