There certainly seem to be considerable suspicions that dishonest postal voting has been going on and that this dishonesty has come from Oldham’s community of Bangladeshi and Pakistani Muslims. Not only that, but there have been concerns raised by the likes of the Electoral Commission that Oldham, along with a number of other heavily Muslim areas, are centres of voter fraud. The pattern of arrival of postal votes arriving in the last days of the campaign that pushed the turnout from 55% to 70%, should also raise alarm bells.
There is enough circumstantial evidence and historical data concerning the likelihood of electoral fraud occurring in Oldham to warrant a proper investigation into what has happened there and to say that Nigel Farage’s comments following the by-election were not entirely, as the Left in the form of Labour’s Deputy Leader Tom Watson, has described it, as ‘sour grapes’, . What we have in the Oldham by-election is the situation where a minority of the population, Muslims, who make up just one in four of the population of the seat, have helped to impose a Labour MP on a constituency, possibly by fraudulent, underhand or coercive means. That is a gross abuse of the democratic system. According to a report in the Times that was quoted by the Brietbart, Labour had prior to the election accepted that their white working class vote had ‘gone west’, but they had expectations of the ‘Asian’ i.e. Muslim vote.
Brietbart said: “The Times speculated before the result that Muslim areas would overwhelming back Labour, thus helping squeeze past UKIP. Around one in four voters in the seat is Muslim, with large numbers of white working class voters and a small number of middle class voters also living in the seat.
One unnamed Labour official told the paper: “The white working class vote is going west, but things seem to be going well among the Asian vote. A win is a win, even if it is seconds before the whistle, with a flat ball.”
The last minute jump in postal votes is especially worrying and could indicate either massive voter impersonation or the operation of a whipped mosque vote system. With the whipped mosque vote local Muslims are ordered to vote a particular way or they won’t be considered as ‘proper Muslims’ (we saw this card played in Tower Hamlets). In Tower Hamlets, the disgraced Islamist-leaning former Mayor Lutfur Rahman and his cronies were running a blatant ‘vote for me or go to hell’ campaign to get votes among backwards uneducated Muslims. There have also been examples of Muslim vote factories operating in Birmingham at least ten years ago, so nobody can possibly complain that this is either a new problem, but it is a problem that urgently needs to be dealt with.
Muslims, especially Muslim women, are also at risk of coercion by local Muslim headmen into voting a particular way. A very telling phrase came from Hellen Pidd, the Guardian’s Northern affairs editor. She said in a Tweet: “A dismaying number of voters I met in Oldham today can’t speak English despite living there a decade or more. But they’re voting Labour. “ When I read stuff like that I cannot help but wonder how many of these Muslim women are voting Labour because they dare not vote anything else for fear of violence?
I think that Nigel Farage and UKIP have a valid point when they state that the Oldham by-election was bent. After all there is a history of concerns about the behaviour of the local Muslims when examined by the Electoral Commission along with the sudden jump in postal votes. Not only that and we have the example of similar Islamic malpractices in other constituencies, where a small number of Muslims call the dishonest electoral shots. Anybody who is concerned with the issue of justice and honesty must surely be opposed to such blatant misuse of our democratic systems? As I said in an article I wrote on this site on the 2nd of December 2015, the sort of gross electoral shenanigans that the Labour/Islam alliance are often involved in is a considerably more dangerous and serious than the examples that I gave of communal voting among Roman Catholics and Jews. Islamic voter fraud is more dangerous than communal voting in general because Islamic voter fraud it has an undue influence on the overall result, thereby disenfranchising hundreds if not thousands of genuine honest voters.
If nothing else the Oldham election surely must be the point when something serious was done to either reform the postal vote system or close it down because it is being so heavily abused. Britain also needs a much more vigorous system of voter ID and of checking for double votes. At present someone can carry a bunch of poll cards from different people and go from polling station to polling station and vote for the candidate preferred by the local Islamic establishment in each one. That and other abuses of the electoral system by Islamic interests needs most urgently to stop.
Following the Oldham result there needs to be an urgent investigation into voter impersonation and into the allegations of the misuse of postal votes by Labour/Islamic interests. Sadly it looks as if we can add Oldham to the list that includes Rotherham, Newham, Barking and Dagenham, Waltham Forest, Birmingham, Blackburn, where a combination of Labour party cynicism and dishonest Islamic votes, conspire to bring about a situation where it becomes virtually impossible to remove an entrenched Labour/Islamic alliance.
Although the Oldham result has all the makings of a scandal in the making, that should not mean that the apathy party should not be let off the hook when it comes to dishing out blame. Part of the reason why bent Islamic postal voting is so successful is that there are an enormous number of people who don’t vote. They are either not interested or feel that their vote will not make any dent on the local establishment and this is especially so in areas where the Labour/Islam alliance is strong. People think ‘why should I bother to vote, Labour always get in’ and to a certain extent I share their cynicism, but every honest vote that is got out helps to dilute the bent Muslim ones. It is beyond odd and beyond wrong that in a democratic society a mere 25% of the followers of an alien death cult can affect the result like this. Although questions need to be asked about how this election was administered, those who stayed at home and let the fraudsters win bigger than they thought they would, also need to take some responsibility for this result. Remember a voter that stays at home ends up voting for that which they may find repellent.
After Oldham there needs to be a serious look taken at the honesty and probity of our electoral system because it is beyond obvious now that there are problems that really need to be dealt with, including the problem of Islamic voter fraud.
Links
Brietbart
Electoral Commission story on voter fraud risk in Oldham
Tom Watson complains of UKIP ‘sour grapes’
http://www.itv.com/news/update/2015-12-04/labour-farage-complaints-look-like-sour-grapes/
Labour have morphed into ‘The Islam Party’
Labour List advising people to ignore those who are bringing up the subject of voter fraud.
http://labourlist.org/2015/12/oldham-west-by-election-liveblog/
Hellen Pidd on the non English speaking voters of Oldham
https://twitter.com/helenpidd/status/670267569291583488
Electoral Commission story from Manchester Evening News
Fraud on an industrial scale as usual from the ghettos.
That, plus the apathy of those who couldn’t be bothered
to get off their arses and go and vote, but will moan about
“how bad things are around here” to anyone who’ll listen.
A 40- odd % turnout or thereabouts according to the Mail.
They deserve all the grief that’s coming to them
Einstein is reputed to have said that two things were infinite,
the universe, and the stupidity of people…
and he wasn’t sure about the universe.
I despair.
I remember a retail fraud perpetrated by the Asian Indo Pak community in collusion with some of the salesman of the company running into millions.
Credit for the purchase of goods at the time was obtained with an instant guarantee when the customer presented a valid credit or cheque card and delivery of the item…
The problem was, many of these married Asian women sometimes had two or more cards in different names because of the habit of retaining maiden names. Also difficulties identifying who is who in high density housing such as flats, sharing flats…
some concerns here too…
http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2015/10/lee-scott-dirty-jew-the-campaign-of-hate-abuse-and-death-threats-that-cast-a-dark-cloud-over-our-electoral-system.html
Good to see Con Home picking up on this.