If someone wanted some reasons as to why British police forces are becoming less and less trusted by ordinary decent citizens then they would not do worse than to look at the behaviour of Sarah Boycott, the Assistant Chief Constable of Cheshire Police.
The people of Widnes in Cheshire are quite correctly up in arms that a former care home is being turned into a hostel for the sort of alleged ‘refugees’ who have made their violent and sexually incontinent presence felt all over Europe. Over 1500 people have signed a petition to stop the Home Office and their contractors Serco from forcing the sort of ‘rapeugees’ that have caused so many problems elsewhere onto the people of Widnes.
However, rather than accept that people have a right to be worried that their area may be turned into a violent, rape afflicted hell hole by these alleged ‘Syrian refugees’ Assistant Chief Constable Boycott’s first course of action is to threaten people who speak up about this plan. ACC Boycott has threatened social media users with prosecution under malicious communication legislation. She also appears to be equating those who are justifiably angry about this plan with those who issue genuine and credible threats. I wonder if ACC Boycott has considered why people are angry and may or may not be issuing credible threats against this former care home or those behind this appalling plan? If she hasn’t then I’ll tell her. People are getting increasingly arsey about this and other similar impositions because they have been consistently ignored when they have peacefully brought their concerns about these ‘refugee’ accommodations to their local councils, police forces and to the Home Office.
People are also sick and fed up of being called ‘racists’ or ‘xenophobes’ when all they are trying to do is protect themselves and their families from the sort of predation that these ‘refugees’ bring wherever they go. If something terrible happens to the building (and I hope it doesn’t) that is being turned into the ‘refugee’ accommodation, or to the alleged ‘refugees’ themselves, then it will be partly down to the behaviour of the politicians, public servants and police whose first actions are to threaten people who speak up. Such individuals and entities have perused a policy of brushing off people’s genuine and well founded concerns about the nature and behaviour of these alleged ‘refugees’ with the equivalent of the phrase ‘shut up and enjoy your enforced diversity’.
If people are forbidden effective and peaceful ways of stopping appalling developments like this then is it any wonder that some hotheads will resort to violence or threats of violence? I’ve consistently said that I’d prefer to see a peaceful political solution to this and other similar problems. However, when ordinary people are denied that peaceful legal route, then they may see other more violent routes as the only way open to them in order to protect their families from the sort of dangerous thugs who are likely to be housed in this new asylum centre.
Here’s the Warrington Guardian, the local newspaper for the area’s coverage of the ACC’s threats to those who want to speak out against this appalling and dangerous imposition on the people of Widnes. As is usual policy for this blog, the original text is in italics whereas this blog’s comments are in plain text.
The Warrington Guardian said:
POLICE officers have launched an investigation into a number of malicious messages posted on social media sites following a planning application to turn a former care home into a hostel for asylum seekers.
People are correct to be angry about this appalling plan that will bring danger to the local people. It’s notable that the police are not clarifying what they consider to be ‘malicious’ and even when they are giving examples they are using the phrases ‘could be’ or ‘might be’ which suggests that the police are possibly on shaky legal ground and are merely trying to threaten local people into silence.
Plans have been submitted to turn the now vacant Lilycross Care Centre on Wilmere Lane, which sits on the edge of boundaries with Warrington and St Helens, into a temporary home for asylum seekers.
A temporary home for imported rapists and jihadis more like.
As previously reported, the facility would provide temporary accommodation while Home Office checks and other assessments are carried out.
I thought we were told by the Home Office that these alleged ‘Syrians’ would be assessed outside the UK before being brought into the country? If that was genuinely the case why are they being assessed here?
Sarah Boycott, assistant chief constable, said: “I want to remind all social media users to think carefully about what they are saying before posting messages online.
I’d like to remind ACC Boycott (pictured below) that it’s not her place to use police resources to shut people up.
Assistant Chief Constable Sarah Boycott of Cheshire Police
“There are a number of laws in place which cover social media; these laws include messages which could be seen to make credible threats of violence towards a person or damage to a property.
There, as I mentioned earlier are the use of the words ‘could be’ which means that she is not absolutely sure that what has been said is contravening current legislation.
“Although you may believe your message is acceptable, other people may take offence, and you could face a large fine up to two years in prison if your message is deemed to have broken the law.
More threats coming from an officer who was ‘fast tracked’ during the politically correct Blair years and gained the majority of her promotions during this time. So what if people take offence from what others say? I see stuff everyday that offends me but I don’t go running to the police about it. What makes these, mostly Muslim, ‘refugees’ so ‘special’ that they are to be shielded from being offended? There are many of us with former refugees in our own families who arrived here, joined the British Armed Forces, obeyed the law and were grateful for a place of safety. They didn’t whine about being ‘offended’ and demand that the police pander to their every whim like these Islamic savages do.
“I would like to reassure the public that we take all reports of malicious communications seriously, and we will take action.”
Many people would prefer that the police dealt with many of the problems that have been brought to these shores by those who have come here falsely claiming that they are ‘oppressed’ and therefore need asylum. A great deal of people would for instance, prefer that the police dealt with the growing problems of Islamic Rape Gangs rather than spending time and resources on ‘hate speech’ guff or similar ‘non-crimes’.
Officers described the investigation as being at an ‘early stage’ and said enquiries were currently on going.
I’d like to remind people that if the police come to your door trying to harass you or gather intelligence about alleged ‘hate speech’ offences and they don’t have evidence of a crime, then you don’t have to let them into your home. Please see the Crimebodge guidance on this matter which can be found here. http://crimebodge.com/never-allow-the-police-into-your-home/
The plot to impose this monstrous and dangerous Asylum Centre on the people of Widnes has enraged local people, quite correctly in my view. According to the Liverpool Echo over 1500 local people have signed a petition to the local authority to try to get this plan stopped.
The Liverpool Echo said:
More than 1,500 people have signed an petition calling for plans which outline transforming a former Widnes care home into an asylum seekers hostel to be refused.
Halton Council has received an application to change Lilycross Care Centre on Wilmere Lane – which was closed down by the Care Quality Commission last year – into an asylum hostel for up to 120 people.
The plans envisage providing temporary accommodation for asylum seekers while Home Office checks are carried out and say that the facility, known as Wilmere House, will be operated by Serco.
Since the proposals have been lodged, an online petition has been launched on Change.org addressed to Halton Council’s planning department and, has attracted more than 1,500 signatures.
The petition, called ‘Reject plans to turn Lilycross care home into an asylum seeker hostel in Widnes Cheshire’, outlines several reasons for objecting, including the site’s ‘isolated’ position and a potential increase in traffic.
It also claims that occupants would have ‘no access’ to facilities other than those at the hostel, and that it would ‘undoubtedly result’ in people leaving and potentially making their way to Widnes, St Helens or Rainhill.
The petition said: “The concept of a hostel for asylum seekers is not unacceptable in principle, although it is quite clear that the personal, social and physical needs of the proposed residents would be best served within a sustainably located town or edge of centre location.
“This proposal will harm this green belt location through its intensification. No very special circumstances have been presented by the applicant that would clearly outweigh the harm caused.
Of course this development will cause harm to local people and not just through increased traffic. The residents of this ‘asylum centre’ will without a doubt end up wandering round local towns, committing crimes, being antisocial and raping local children and young women, just as they have done in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark etc. It shouldn’t merely be ‘moved somewhere else’ as some may wish but instead these alleged ‘refugees’ shouldn’t be here in the UK at all.
This proposed asylum centre will bring nothing but misery and I can really see why people are angry about not just the plan itself, but the threatening and nasty attitude of police officers such as ACC Boycott.
Links
Warrington Guardian article about the threats by ACC Sarah Boycott to those opposing the new ‘rapeugee’ centre in Widnes
Liverpool Echo on the massive number of objections to this new asylum centre
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/local-news/over-1500-sign-petition-against-11793631
Assistant Chief Constable Sarah Boycott’s bio from the Cheshire Police website
Yes and that is exactly how racial division is caused. Freedom of speech is compromised by purpetually offended mozlems, police and government. The real British, not the pretend ones (which is anyone these days) are being pushed down and their opinion counts for nothing., This country is going to the dogs. It the government cannot stand by us then why should I abide by the law? what is the point in being British when Britain is not British but an inflicted, forced multicultural mess of people that now hate each other, most of all the indigenous. Screw the police, fk the mozlems, fk the government. If article 50 is not invoked soon there will be riots and I will be part of them.
Completely understandable. Riots or even worse are coming to England, and they will have been instigated by the mooslime and their enablers in the media, academia and government…
I pity the neighbours. Recently in Stockport, a decent hotel was taken over by “our friends” and all of a sudden there were robberies and intimidation by these people. Be scared, it’s only gonna get worse.
It’s appalling, wherever these invaders are put up the locals suffer. I’d be interested in doing a longer piece on the problems that these invaders have caused in Stockport. If you can please email me with details and I’ll see what I can do. The email addy can be found in the ‘contact’ section.