This is an old story from 2015 but it’s one that illustrates the danger of having a double standard in the law where Muslims are treated with kid gloves. An Islamic sex offender, formerly from the town of Accrington, and with a long list of other non-sexual offences to his name was not jailed when he abducted and raped a 12 year old girl. Instead, at a court appearance in 2009 a judge sent Imran Khan, aged 34, on a sexual offenders rehabilitation course. Abduction and rape, especially of children shouldn’t be disposed of in this manner and Khan should really have done some time in prison.
Because this Islamic savage was allowed to be on the outside and because he managed to hoodwink those in charge of the rehabilitation course into thinking Khan was a changed man, it gave him the opportunity to sexually assault another child. But, just a few days after completing the rehabilitation course Khan abducted a 6 year old girl, drove her to a remote location, exposed himself to her and forced her to commit a sex act. This worthless and cruel Islamic savage then drove the terrified and traumatised child to near where she lived and dumped her in a wheelie bin.
He eventually appeared in court for this abduction and was given a life sentence by a Judge. However, the judge imposed a minimum length of time that he must serve in prison of only six years and seven months. This is an appallingly lenient sentence. Six and a half years is what a person would serve for a low level robbery or an aggravated burglary. It’s not enough, not nearly enough. He should never have been put on the rehabilitation course he wasn’t suitable and this case will raise suspicions that he was put on it merely because he was Muslim and there’s a dangerous current of appeasement of Islam at present running through veins of the British Establishment.
Here’s the report from the local newspaper that covered the case of Khan and his sexual deviancy.
The Manchester Evening News said:
A court was shown a felt tip drawing by the victim of predatory paedophile to illustrate the nightmares she has suffered since being snatched from the street.
Imran Khan, of Accrington, was jailed for life after grabbing the six-year-old girl up from a Burnley street and later dumped her in a wheelie bin.
Imran Khan, 34, of Pendle Street, stood emotionless in the dock as he was told he would serve a minimum of six years and seven months before being considered for parole.
The court was told that Khan, who had previously been convicted for the rape of a 12-year-old girl in 2009, ‘cruised the streets’ on March 26 ‘looking for an opportunity’.
Burnley Crown Court heard that Khan had completed an intensive sexual offenders treatment programme just days before coming across his victim playing on her bike.
The court heard that Khan bundled the victim into the boot of his car in broad daylight before driving four miles to an ‘isolated’ location and exposing himself to her and inciting her to commit a sexual act.
The victim told police officers how Khan had dumped her in a wheelie bin after the ‘terrifying’ ordeal. She was found shortly afterwards wandering the streets ‘in a distressed state’ by children of a similar age, who took her to their parent’s house.
The alarm was then raised and police established through examination of CCTV that she had been snatched by Khan, who was arrested on March 28 and charged.
The court was told how the victim has suffered recurring nightmares since the incident and she produced a felt tip pen drawing for the court to illustrate her nightmares.
Jeremy Lasker, defending said: “He accepts that what he did was motivated by sex, not every defendant is prepared to do that. He also admitted doing several laps of the area hoping for an opportunity to arise.”
Khan pleaded guilty to kidnap, kidnap with intent to commit a sexual offence and breach of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order.
Speaking after the sentence, Detective Inspector Jim Elston said: “I am pleased with today’s result following the horrendous ordeal that this young girl had to endure which has left a lasting effect on her and her family.
“I must commend the courage and resilience that the victim has shown, particularly given her age.
“I hope that now Khan is behind bars that the family are able to start moving forward with their lives and the victim is able to try and enjoy a normal, happy childhood which she fully deserves, despite this trauma.”
A judge has told a child snatcher that he will serve a ‘long time’ in prison before being considered for parole.
Judge Michael Newell told Imran Khan that he posed a ‘significant risk’ to the public after he admitted abducting and exposing himself to a six year old girl.
Sentencing Khan to life imprisonment Judge Newell said that he had caused damage and hurt to the victim, family and wider community that was ‘probably permanent’.
Judge Newell said: “You cruised and criss-crossed the streets for 10 minutes and then came across the victim.
“You manhandled her into the boot of your car and took her a short distance out into the county.”
The judge said that after attempting to incite the girl to commit a sex act he drove off and and tipped her head first into a wheelie bin, but not before making threatening remarks to her.
The court was told that Khan had 15 past convictions for 56 offences, which varied from dishonesty, handling of stolen goods and the supply and control of class A drugs.
The most recent past offence was on in 2009 when Khan abducted and raped a 12-year-old girl.
Judge Newell said: “When you were released in 2013 there was hope for your future, you completed a sex offender treatment programme and there feedback was positive.
“But just days or weeks after finishing that course you went on to commit this offence. It was a planned and predatory act to satisfy your perverted sexual desires.”
In summing up Judge Newell said the Khan’s actions had had a wider damaging affect on the community.
He said: “In the last seven years on two occasions you have taken a child from the streets of East Lancashire for your own perverted sexual desires, one aged 12 the other aged six, one was raped the other released, both traumatised.
“You have caused possibly permanent damage, your actions don’t just damage young lives and families, your crimes have a wider effect upon the community. Every parent wants their child to be able to walk to school, play on their bike without fear that this will happen, your actions fracture that trust.”
This savage didn’t commit a spur of the moment minor sexual offence, of the sort that in some very limited circumstances, may deserve a rehabilitation order, this was an offence that should have resulted in imprisonment. This offence and the previous sexual offence committed by Khan were serious, pre-planned, have caused long term damage to the victims and should therefore have warranted a much more significant sentence than the ones that he got. The judge who gave Khan the original rehabilitation order not only made a grave error but also created the conditions for Khan to attack yet another child. Even when this savage was given a prison term it wasn’t a fraction as long as it should have been. Six years and seven months minimum term isn’t a life sentence, nothing like it, in fact it’s an insult to the whole idea of justice. He’s raped and traumatised children and he’s done it with deliberation and with planning.
I’m utterly shocked that this savage Khan was even considered for a rehabilitation order, neither he nor the offence that he committed were remotely suitable for such a method of disposal. There are two people who are responsible for this appalling abduction of a six year old girl. The first one is Khan himself and the second is the judge who imposed the rehabilitation order when Khan should have been sent to prison.
I can’t help but wonder how this offence would have been dealt with if it had been a non-Muslim attacker? Knowing the current fashion for pandering to Islam and Muslims by the Establishment I believe that it’s more than likely that the initial sentence for the rape of the 12 year old would have resulted in a prison sentence. This case therefore is a classic illustration of the double standard with which Muslims are treated by Britain’s legal system. Cases like this show that not only does the ordinary British citizen face significant problems from these savage Muslims themselves, but they also are being assaulted by those Quislings who treat Muslims with legal kid gloves and assist Muslims in their often bestial crimes.
Link
Manchester Evening News story on the Islamic paedophile savage Imran Khan and the lenient sentences that he’s been given
To give people some idea of how bad the Islamic sex crime problem in the UK is take a look at this map from the counterjihad blogger Kafircrusader. It is by now means complete and doesn’t include all the attacks by Muslims that have been committed in the United Kingdom but it is comprehensive enough to shock people at the sheer scale of Britain’s Islamic sex crime problem.
https://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/muslim-grooming-paedo-map/
The judge who pronounced the sentence should be dismissed, and the sentence must be reviewed. The family should ask for a review. This story tells me that the law is an ass!
Agree there. The original rehab order seems to be an extremely lenient sentence for the rape of a child. It’s the sort of sentence that should only be reserved for those who’ve committed very minor offences. Even with the second offence the prison term imposed wasn’t Life per se but a minimum term of six years seven months. It’s way too lenient. I used to work many years ago as a court reporter and saw scores of nonces punished by prison and I saw only one case where disposal by some form of rehab order would have been morally justified.
Rehab orders like this should not be used for serious cases where rape and abduction are involved. Even the Crown sentencing guidance states that rape of an under 13 and aggravating factors such as abduction deserve prison. I certainly don’t think that Muslim nonces, who are driven by their cultural approval of paedophilia, should be dealt with by non-custoodials. Firstly because their Islamic culture and theology tells them that raping kids is not wrong which means that they are a danger to all children once they put these cultural mores into practise and secondly because we can’t trust them to be truthful once on rehab courses because Islam permits lying to non-Muslims.
Both these sentences are unduly lenient and although it may not be possible to lobby to increase the sentence for the original rape, he should certainly have got more than six years minimum for the second case and people should be justly angry about this. It’s appallingly unjust sentencing of Islamic nonces like this which will cause people to lose faith in the law and possibly consider taking the law into their own hands.
In this case the Law and more specifically the judiciary has proved themselves to be asses.