Over the last few years there has been a considerable amount of unwanted Islamisation happening in the London Borough of Redbridge, which is on the borders of East London and Essex. Despite opposition from local residents, the area has seen, often with the connivance of councillors, mosques imposed on their areas, and buildings dedicated to general community use, such as Jacques Hall in Hainault, being virtually stolen by an Islamic group and turned into ‘Islamic community centres’.
The Redbridge area has also seen multiple attempts to game the planning system to wear down opponents in order to impose a very much unwanted mosque in South Woodford and the council have allowed sprawling Islamic cemeteries to eat up green spaces. Islamisation in Redbridge has also helped oust a Tory council and the Tory MP for Ilford North, replacing them with a Labour local authority and putting the supine fresh-faced Labour Islamopanderer Wes Streeting into the Ilford North seat. A full list of links to other Redbridge related stories from this site, which in themselves contain links to external media, can be found in the links section at the bottom of this article.
Redbridge, for those who do not know the area, was once home to Britain’s largest Jewish community, had shopping facilities that people travelled from miles around to get to, was a centre for night-life and entertainment and was a place that people from poorer areas of East London aspired to live in. Now, because of Islam and the appeasement of it by those in authority, Redbridge looks like it is well on its way to becoming another dangerous Islamised shithole like the neighbouring boroughs of Newham and Waltham Forest. Because of Islam, Redbridge is increasingly a place where Jews, women and others targeted by Islam are feeling more and more unsafe.
What has happened to Redbridge is a tragedy for a once civilised area. Long standing communities of different faiths and races, but all hard working and aspirational, are being forced out of the area by Islamic expansionism and the truly diverse culture of the area is being replaced by an often hostile Islamic monoculture.
But those who live further out from Redbridge, in places like neighbouring Havering, should not be complacent and think that what is happening to Redbridge and what has happened to Newham and Waltham Forest, can’t happen there. It can and it is happening. News has come to me that the Planning Inspectorate has imposed a huge Islamic cemetery on neighbouring Havering despite objections to this project from the local residents and the London Borough of Havering, who claimed that the development was ‘inappropriate for green belt land. Unfortunately, cemeteries are considered as exempted from development restrictions on green belt land and therefore this monstrosity has been approved.
Here’s a report from the local newspaper for the Redbridge and Havering areas, the Ilford Recorder, on a controversial development that only the Muslims and the quislings to Islam appear to want. As is usual policy for this blog the original source text is in italics whereas my comments are in plain text.
The Ilford Recorder said:
A charity which caters to Muslim burial needs has been given the green light to create a contested 10,000 plot cemetery.
This is a development that will bring no benefit at all to the people of Havering.
Gardens of Peace which owns two sites in Redbridge – one in Elmbridge Road, Hainault and another at Five Oaks Lane, Chigwell – feared it would run out of space.
The murky stories surrounding the ‘Gardens of Peace’ outfit in Redbridge and their pushiness and whining are legion. Also those behind the ‘Gardens of Peace’ cemeteries are allegedly imposing Saudi-style Wahhabi rules on both the cemeteries and those relatives who visit the graves of their loved ones there.
This, and other examples of rapid and well funded Islamisation has led this author to believe that there may well be Saudi money sloshing round the Redbridge area, funding the expansion of Islam. Bearing in mind the fact that Gardens of Peace had enough money to outbid Havering council for the cemetery site it is probably correct to ask or wonder just where did this large amount of money to purchase the land in Havering come from?
But the concerns were alleviated when the planning inspectorate agreed on Monday for the proposals to go ahead.
I’m saddened but not surprised to see Planning Inspectorate involvement in the imposition of this monstrosity. After all, they have form in this area for pandering to Islam. There has been another occasion in Redbridge when the Planning Inspectorate has overruled objections by both local councillors and residents in the Woodford area and imposed a mosque where it was plainly not wanted. This decision was taken by the Planning Inspectorate despite this mosque having already been caught operating illegally and quite correctly refused planning permission by the local authority.
“It’s good news,” said Gardens of Peace founding member Farouk Ismail.
Farouk Ismail it must be said, is a pretty dodgy or at the very least questionable character. He’s the chairman of the Federation of Redbridge Muslim Organisations (FORMO), and has had influence with the management of Gardens of Peace which may well account for one reason why there was a sudden imposition of strict Shariah Law rules on one of the Gardens of Peace cemeteries. Farouk Ismail has also taken and publicised without question some iffy or more likely downright fake ‘statistics’ emanating from the disgraced Tell Mama group in order to exploit the November 2015 Paris Islamic attacks in order to whine about ‘Islamophobia. This new cemetery in Havering may be good news for Ismail and his cronies and backers but it is not good news for the existing people of Havering.
“I am delighted, of course we will work with the [Havering] council and community every step of the way.”
Do I smell taqiyya and bullshit? I most surely do.
The new cemetery will be built on disused land at Oak Farm, Maylands Fields, Harold Wood.
Despite both Havering Council and Gardens of Peace agreeing the development would be an inappropriate use of the green belt and the overall size of the site increased, policy lists cemeteries as a permitted exception.
This is odd, or at least it sounds odd to me that both the council and the organisation behind the planned cemetery agreed that the use of green belt land and the size of the development would be inappropriate, yet the development still went ahead due to the cemeteries exception to planning law. If even the developer agreed that it was not a suitable development for the green belt, then why didn’t they withdraw the application?
The answer may lie in the fact that increasingly, Islamic groups can rely on the Planning Inspectorate to come down on the side of Muslims, more often than not, which is what happened with the Woodford mosque imposition. It may also have something to do with the amount of whining for ‘more Islamic stuff’ coming from both Muslims, various Quislings for Islam and assorted useful idiots, that Havering council has been receiving over the last year or so. This has included a planning expert from the Royal Town Planning Institute, Niall Roberts, who lambasted Havering council for ‘not doing enough for Muslims and who said, at a planning inquiry into the cemetery proposals, that the local authority has: ‘“…a reluctance to recognise the need of the Muslim community,” It appears that what has happened in Havering is a case of the Muslim community’s ‘needs’ are, as is so often the case, being placed above the rights of everyone else.
The planning inspectorate also concluded that the development would safeguard the countryside from encroachment and remain essentially rural in character and appearance.
Yeah right, of course it will. In reality, it won’t, just as we keep getting told the lie that mosques do not cause extreme traffic congestion, but they nearly always end up causing gridlock at service times. This cemetery development will of course bring huge disruption, greatly increased traffic flows and will impact negatively on those who live in or near the area.
Commenting on Facebook, Havering resident Dave Wackett said: “[I} do not agree with this, as I think most people in the area. It is a traffic black spot which would be made far worst if this was to be given the go ahead.”
I get the impression from this and other unpublished sources that there are a great many people in the Harold Hill area who are extremely upset about this imposition. They are disappointed that their fight against the loss of the land to a Muslim cemetery has been kicked into touch by the Planning Inspectorate.
“I don’t like upsetting anyone from any community,” Mr Ismail continued.
Hmm! Despite that comment from Ismail, don’t let yourself be fooled. Although he makes statements like this, that hasn’t stopped him from being a divisive character in the past. He’s also not above exploiting tragedies for his own and his community’s political benefit, as discussed in some of the previously given links here and here.
“I like community cohesion and we are going to do our very best to make everyone happy. That is what’s important.”
Does anyone else smell the not quite so sweet smell of fimo bovis or bullshit coming from Ismail’s mouth here? I do. This is because Ismail’s words about ‘community cohesion’ and ‘making everyone happy’ are meaningless empty ones.
We can see this by observing how Ismail has behaved in the past. With regards to the cemeteries Ismail has either not prevented or worse still, encouraged strict Shariah Law in the cemeteries he is involved in, even when less observant Muslims have found the policies objectionable. He’s also shown his true colours by cynically exploiting Islamic murders in order to whine about ‘Islamophobia’. It shows me a man who cares nothing for real cohesion, but who only cares about expanding Islam and he doesn’t seem to mind very much how he does it.
In my opinion Ismail is not being entirely frank with people and is trying to placate those who are concerned about this development by making empty and dishonest mouth noises about cohesion and happiness.
As I have said previously this development will bring no good whatsoever to the original inhabitants of the London Borough of Havering. The development itself will bring greatly increased traffic and despite what the Planning Inspector has said will adversely affect the area’s rural character.
Another thing to be concerned about is the likelihood that this development will also be used as a beachhead by Islamic groups in order to impose even more Islam on the people of Havering even though ‘more Islam’ is the very last thing that people need dumped on them. I know from talking to people in the Havering area, that there are a number of non-Muslim British people whose families moved to Havering for a better life and also to get away from the Islamification that had afflicted Tower Hamlets, Newham and elsewhere. I feel very sorry for the children and grandchildren of those who struggled and worked hard get out of Islamised places like Tower Hamlets and Newham. It’s shameful that their rights to live free of anything to do with the ideology of Islam have been trampled upon. These are people who know from bitter experience what Islam is really like and what it really does to the areas it dominates. Quite rightly, a number of people do not appear to want it anywhere near where they are and who can blame them?
Unfortunately the Planning Inspectorate has decided in its infinite wisdom that the rights of the non-Muslims in Havering do not count one iota and have sold the non-Muslims of Havering down the river for what is little more than a pat on the head and a ‘diversity’ badge’. Those who should have protected our countryside and our people, have yet again appeased noisy and aggressive Muslim groups at the expense of everyone else.
Links
Original Ilford Recorder story on the new cemetery in Havering
Has Redbridge become a target for Saudi money and influence?
Planning Inspectorate imposes mosque despite objections by councillors and residents of Woodford
Farouk Ismail exploits Islamic jihadi mass murder in Paris to whine about virtually non existent ‘Islamophobia’
Planning expert chastises Havering council for failing to ‘meet the needs of Muslims’
The Islamisation of Redbridge Part One
The Islamisation of Redbridge Part Two
Imposition of mosque in Newbury Park, Redbridge
Jacques Hall community centre stolen by Muslim group
Gaming the planning system to impose a huge unwanted mosque on South Woodford
Article about a news report concerning the increasing fear felt by Jewish women in Redbridge following the rise of Islam
Absolutely disgusting! Why don’t they build so much more necessary houses on this land? They will be bringing muslims from all over the country to be buried in Havering!!!
Infinite wisdom? You really mean infantile wisdom.