The answer to that question is when the alleged perpetrators turn out to be from a minority group of course.
When an asylum seeker was brutally beaten up in Croydon in South London recently the Left and the Conservatives-in-name-only rushed eagerly to condemn what they referred to as a ‘racist’ and ‘xenophobic’ ‘hate crime’.
Unfortunately it turns out that whoever battered this person severely, or who are suspected of battering this person, wasn’t a stereotypcial tattooed ‘white supremacist’ but instead individuals who represent South London’s ‘enrichment’ communities or to put it another way, members of minority groups. Of course once this was revealed, as stated by Ambush Predator writing on the Orphans of Liberty blog, the left and the fake conservative went all quiet and the attack was downgraded from a ‘hate crime’ to a ‘brutal attack’.
Here’s the image that Ambush Predator found of those that the police wish to speak to regarding this brutal attack.
This case is yet another reason why the whole subjective and easily manipulated concept of ‘hate crimes’ and ‘hate speech’ needs to be condemned to the legal dustbin and only ever taken out again to be used as a cautionary tale for Law Students about the dangers of letting political motivations infest jurisprudence. The madness of the whole ‘hate crime’ idea has been exposed by the rapid turn around in attitudes by the politicians and the fact that many of them have slunk away when it was revealed that this attack really didn’t fit their narrative.
Link
Ambush Predator writing on the Orphans of Liberty blog
