Whilst I can accept that there are a number of individual Muslims who take a reformist attitude to the ideology, or who wear this ideology lightly, an examination of the theological, cultural and political tenets of Islam shows that it is problematical. If a person followed the absolute fundamentals of Islam, you could quite fairly describe that person as ‘evil’. Therefore it’s pretty accurate to describe Islam, as Anne Marie Waters, the UKIP candidate for Lewisham has done, as evil.

An ideology, such as Islam, that orders its adherents to kill and maim both Muslim and non-Muslim alike, that oppresses and mutilates women and which promulgates the sort of hatreds against Jews, Christians, Hindus and Sikhs, that would not be out of place in a nation run by Stalinism or Nazism, can’t really be described in any other way. Although not all individual Muslims are evil, any rational and accurate examination of Islam, it’s theology and its history, will cause the observer to come to the conclusion that what we are dealing with is not a peaceful religious faith with a few violent nutters but an evil death-cult. How else can one explain why so many Muslims who delve down into Islamic theology and Islamic law end up as violent thugs and murderers? It’s not ‘mental illness’ or a ‘misunderstanding’ it really is the Islam stupid.

I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of Christians and Jews who since the turn of the 21^st Century, have committed acts of violence against members of other faiths or against those who profess no faith or who have committed acts of violence and oppression in the name of their faiths. However, there have been nearly 31,000 terror attacks where Islam has been proven to be either the main or supplementary motive since September 11^th 2001. This figure doesn’t include the mass rapes including gang rapes that have been carried out by Muslims against non Muslim girls and young women and neither does it include crimes where there is an Islamic motive or where the perpetrators are influenced by Islamic supremacist attitudes. If you include these other negative aspects of Islam and negative effects of Islam then the number of problem incidents connected to Islam would climb a lot higher than 31,000. I have no problem with describing Islam as irredeemably evil, even though I acknowledge that there are some Muslims who are not.

Yes, Islam is evil, of that there can be no doubt at least to the minds and opinions of any reasonable person who respects life and respects freedom.

So, if as reasonable people, civilised people and people who respect life and respect freedom, how should we consider and classify those who pander to Islam and attack those who point out the uncomfortable truth that Islam is evil? Surely if you assist evil or make excuses for it or try to silence those who highlight the evil, then should you not be considered, either in whole or in part, evil yourself?

Firmly in the category of those who are attacking Anne Marie Waters for speaking up against the evils of Islam, come Tim Farron the leader of the Liberal Democrats and Caroline Lucas of the Green Party. That these two national figures choose to attack someone like Ms Waters who is a feminist, a secularist, a gay woman and who has put herself on the line speaking out against theocratic fascism tells us that the Lib Dems and the Greens have chosen evil over good. These two political figures could have done the right thing and stood up for women’s rights, children’s rights, the right of people to change or reject religion as they see fit which are all values that Ms Waters stands for, but instead they chose to attack her. After this can we ever again believe anything that either Farron or Lucas say about the issues of secularism, gay rights, religious freedom or women’s rights? I believe that we can’t. If they truly believed in such values then they would be supporting Ms Waters and not attacking her.

The fiscally failing Guardian newspaper which has carried this story,which includes the comments by Farron and Lucas and which has firmly put itself in the camp that opposes Ms Waters, should also be considered as an entity that has chosen, in the words of the Biblical prophet Isaiah, ‘to call good evil and evil good’. Once, a long while ago, before the Middle Class identity politics Left got their claws into it, the Guardian was a good newspaper and one I used to avidly read myself. I respected it’s policy of having a different voice to that of other broadsheets and even when I didn’t agree with it, I respected it. Now, having seen how it has become a mouthpiece for the extreme Left, the multiculturalist obsessives who can’t see the damage that their policies have caused and most damagingly Islamic extremists and their apologists, I find I can respect it no longer. That the Guardian, a newspaper that once gave a platform and a voice for feminists who were not heard elsewhere, is now attacking a feminist who decries Islamic misogyny must also put this newspaper fairly and squarely into the ‘apologists for evil’ category.

Also to be condemned are those who unjustly accuse the United Kingdom Independence Party of ‘declaring war on Muslims’. Does it escape the notice of such people that the followers of Islam have so often declared war on us and our way of life? If they see this war on civilisation and choose to back the followers of Islam the they also are handmaidens of the evil of Islam.

With an election coming up on the 8^th of June, voters should look at which individuals and which parties are attacking a decent individual like Anne Marie Waters and put their vote anywhere else than against people like Farron and Lucas and the parties that they stand for and represent. Such people and parties do not deserve your vote as they will use it to support the very people and ideologies that want you, and I and our children dead or enslaved.

I support Anne Marie Waters and I support her because it’s the correct and moral thing to do and I hope and pray that you can find it in yourselves to do the same. I’d rather have Anne Marie Waters as my Member of Parliament than a snivelling Islamic appeaser like Tim Farron or Caroline Lucas.