There’s been a short gap in the awarding of this blog’s ‘British Neville Chamberlain Award for Islamic Appeasement’ because other projects that those behind this blog have been involved in have had to take priority. However, the ‘Neville’s’ are back and we restart with a story of alleged malice and incompetence by police officers which is so egregious and outrageous, that it deserves to be marked by a ‘Neville Award’. Not only that, but this is a case that has aroused so much disgust among ordinary decent British citizens, that I’m not going to wait for the end of the month to publish this. I’m going to publish it now only half way or so through the month. The award has also been brought forward as I doubt that I will find a greater or more disgraceful example of Islamopandering by senior police officers before the month concludes.
Here’s the background to this story.
Back in September 2016, a young British mother was on a night out in Sunderland in the North East of England. She alleged that whilst she was out her drink was spiked by a group of Muslims who are said to be ‘refugees’ from Iraq and Syria, who took her away while she was insensible due to the drug that was said to be administered by them. The complainant, who has waived her legal right to anonymity, a right that is given to all those alleging sexual assault, is a woman called Chelsey Wright, who said that the Muslims raped her and beat her in a house in the Sunderland area. She stated that eventually escaped from her captors and contacted Northumbria Police, which is the local force for the Sunderland area.
The alleged assailants were arrested and charged with rape by the police who, rather than requesting that these men be remanded in custody, which is commonplace for those accused of certain crimes of violence, placed the accused in a comfy ‘safe house’ in the Sunderland area. The police are said to have carried out a very perfunctory investigation of this crime and have failed to interview vital witnesses despite being prompted to do so by Ms Wright herself and her family. Ms Wright and her family and supporters are justifiably angry that not only were the alleged assailants left to walk free in the local area, but that the police didn’t seem to be making the required amount of effort to bring these assailants to trial.
Fast forward to May 2017 and the police passed to the prosecuting authorities, the Crown Prosecution Service, an evidence file that was decidedly ‘thinner’ than it could have been because the police didn’t do a thorough enough job of gathering and recording relevant evidence. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) looked at the evidence that the police had supplied them and decided to ‘no crime’ this case. In other words the men that Ms Wright has accused of raping her will face no further action. They will not even be brought to court where their story of the events and Ms Wright’s story of events can be tested. They have got off scot-free.
There has been a large amount of anger both in the local area and across the whole United Kingdom about the way that the police and the CPS have handled this case. This anger has been compounded by the fact that the North East of England has been plagued with a rash of Islamic Rape Gang complaint cases that have only recently been started to be acted upon. This blog’s sources in the region have said that this Islamic Rape Gang problem only started to be tackled once the story of the Rotherham Islamic Rape Gang scandal came to public attention. There are also suspicions, that have been voiced confidentially to this blog, that infiltration by the political Left and by various Islamic and Islamist organisations and individuals, has compromised the honesty and integrity of the CPS. These claims get some degree of credibility when comparisons are made between the way in which the CPS has sluggishly moved in the Chelsey Wright case and how swiftly they act when some thin skinned intemperate Muslim individual comes whining to them about ‘hurt feelings’ or some other spurious bullshit. The CPS seeming to be going out of their way to bury cases like that of Ms Wright does not help such suspicions about CPS bias to go away.
Many readers of this blog will agree with me that neither the police nor the Crown Prosecution Service have covered themselves in glory regarding this case. However, it’s the behaviour of a particular senior police officer that this ‘Neville Award’ article is concerned about.
Chief Superintendent Ged Noble is one of those officers who although born and bred in the North East, has appeared to have gained most of his advancement within the Northumbria force during a time when the police became overly politicised by the the Left and those promoting Islamopandering, under the Blair and Brown governments. Chief Superintendent Noble utters the usual platitudes about how ‘diverse and vibrant’ his Southern Command area is, platitudes that are essential utterances for any police officer wishing to climb the greasy pole of promotion in today’s police forces.
Chief Superintendent Ged Noble of Northumbria Police
Chief Superintendent Noble also seems to be another of those officers, of which there are far too many, who wish to stop people talking about Britain’s Islamic Rape Gang problem and the police’s often piss-poor response to these gangs and these sort of attacks. Ms Wright made public statements to the media and on social media about her dissatisfaction with the fact that the police didn’t investigate the offence properly and also that the CPS had swept the case under the carpet by refusing to proceed.
Chief Superintendent Noble made a long statement in which he blathered on about ‘community cohesion’ (a statement increasingly seen by ordinary non Muslim Britons as an instruction to ‘not upset the Muslims’) and accused people who were talking about the case of ‘grossly misrepresenting the facts’. Chief Superintendent Noble failed to mention that it was Ms Wright herself who brought these matters to public attention and attempted to make it seem as if third parties had stoked up the issue, which is plainly not the case. It was Ms Wright and her neighbours and friends in the local area who had initially voiced their concern about the case and not the outside troublemakers whom Chief Superintendent Noble attempted to blame. The case and in particular the way that the police have handled this case has so annoyed and distressed Ms Wright and her friends and supporters that a rally in her support was held in Sunderland. There will be another demonstration of support for Ms Wright and against the problem of Islamic Rape Gangs in Sunderland on 10th June 2017.
The press statement put out by Chief Superintendent Noble on the 5th May 2017, shows that the senior officer went out of his way to absolve the police of any blame for the dropping of the Islamic Rape Gang case. Instead he tried to shift the blame onto the Crown Prosecution Service. This statement along with this blog’s comments on that statement can be found via the link below.
As this blog said in the above linked article, there are a lot of reasons to be disinclined to believe the statement made by Chief Superintendent Noble and Northumbria Police, but here are just three.
Firstly and most obviously there is the cowardly shifting of blame for the failure of the case, from the police and onto the CPS. This is in spite of Chelsey Wright and her family making repeated and public statements about their concerns about the way the police have handled this case, including allegations that the police have failed to interview key witnesses. These key witnesses are those who could have attested to Chelsey’s physical and mental state immediately following the alleged assault by the Muslim ‘refugees’.
Secondly the statement by Chief Superintendent Noble tried to hide behind the victims ‘feelings’ in a cynical attempt to get the public to stop talking about this and other Islamic Rape Gang cases.
The relevant section of the statement by Chief Superintendent Noble said:
“It is disappointing that the victim is now having to endure a situation where the case she was involved in is being subjected to entirely misleading reporting, based on unfounded information, via social-media outlets.
The senior officer who penned this statement is basically trying to shut people up about this. He’s using a dishonest and wholly created, image of a victim, a victim who is having to put up with something akin to the unwelcome media speculation that the innocent man Christopher Jefferies endured, following the murder of landscape gardener Jo Yates in Bristol in 2010. This is plainly not the case, anyone can see that. As I said earlier Ms Wright herself voiced the concerns about police behaviour with regards to this case. This is a shameful twisting of the narrative by Northumbria Police.
Thirdly is the mealy-mouthed, jargon-ridden, knee jerk statements and downright arrogant statement made by Chief Superintendent Noble about the effect of the publicity surrounding this case. Chief Superintendent Noble said:
“This would seem to be a deliberate attempt to undermine the very strong community-cohesion that currently exists across the force area and we urge our communities to see it for what it is.”
We should always be wary of the term ‘community cohesion’ whether it is used by councillors, council officers, politicians and especially by police officers. As we’ve see so often both in Northumbria and elsewhere, such as in Rotherham, Oxford, Rochdale or Newham in East London, the term ‘community cohesion’ has often been practically translated as the force having a policy of ‘not upsetting the Muslims’. It is over-concern for ‘community cohesion’ that has seen Islamic Rape Gangs ignored and religiously motivated attacks on members of other religions also ignored. These crimes and a lot of others have been swept under the carpet so that the police can tick their mandatory ‘diversity boxes’ and get an easier life.
Unfortunately as we all now know, there is a cost to be paid for a police force placing too much emphasis on ‘community cohesion’ and that price is often a costly one and is paid by the non Muslims that suffer from Islamic crime that is rarely if ever properly tackled. By using the term ‘community cohesion’ Chief Superintendent Noble has clearly stated where his professional policing responsibilities lie. His priorities certainly doesn’t seem to include protecting people like Ms Wright and the other similar complainants, who are now coming forward and speaking about Islamic sex crime in the area. Like all too many other senior police officers Chief Superintendent Noble has a ‘protect the Muslim’ kneejerk reaction.
Chief Superintendent Noble’s statement was also extremely arrogant as it presumes that he has the right to apparently tell people who he is policing to: shut up and enjoy the enforced diversity, even if does get a little ‘rapey’ at times. In fact the whole statement by Chief Superintendent Noble stinks of someone desperately screaming at people to shut up and don’t lift up the carpet under which Northumbria Police and the CPS appear to have swept this case.
So now we come to this month’s British Neville Chamberlain Award for pandering to Islam and there can be no doubt in my mind that Chief Superintendent Noble is both a worthy and an unworthy recipient of this award. He gets it for seeming to favour the Islam appeasing ‘community cohesion’ ideology, for mangling the actualite in order to not speak about Ms Wright’s concerns or the fact that she herself brought this case to the public eye. Chief Superintendent Noble also receives this award for cowardly shifting the blame for the dropping of the case from his force’s own inadequacies and possible malfeasance, onto the Crown Prosecution Service.
Chief Superintendent Noble, with his obsession with ‘community cohesion’ and fondness for empty buzzwords such as ‘diverse’, ‘vibrant’ and ‘engaging with our various communities’, is an example of everything that is wrong with British police forces today. It’s senior officers like Chief Superintendent Noble who by their Islamopandering and obsessions with ‘diversity’ have made our police forces simultaneously a laughing stock and entities that are deeply mistrusted by the ordinary decent law abiding British subject. I will conclude to asking the question why Chief Superintendent Noble and the Northumbria Police force as a whole, are so desperate for people not to talk about the issue of Islamic sex crime in their force area? Could it be that there is an Islamic sex crime can of worms that senior officers in the force and in the local political Establishment do not wish to be opened?
So, Chief Superintendent Noble, for the reasons given above, the contributors, readers and editor of the Fahrenheit 211 blog award you the May 2017 British Neville Chamberlain Award for pandering to the followers of Islam to the detriment of others.
Here’s Chief Superintendent Noble’s Neville Certificate.
You may wish to contact Chief Superintendent Noble and register your dismay and dissatisfaction with how they have handled the Chelsey Wright case. You may even feel that it would be a good idea to send the officer a copy of his Neville Certificate, it is available via the .pdf link above. If you wish to contact the Chief Superintendent then use the email and postal addresses below.
If you wish to write a letter to Chief Superintendent Noble outlining your concerns then his postal address is:
Chief Superintendent Ged Noble
Southern Area Command Headquarters
Church Bank,
Southwick,
Sunderland.
SR5 2DU
I would like to remind the readers of this blog that no matter how you contact Chief Superintendent Noble please keep all your communications with him and those who work for him polite, legal, decent, honest and truthful.
Links
Justice for Chelsey Wright
https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2017/05/04/justice-for-chelsey/
Chief Superintendent Ged Noble tries to tell people to shut up about the Chelsey Wright case for the sake of ‘community cohesion’.
Muslims accused of gang rape allowed bail and told to live in a ‘safe house’
Police biography of Chief Superintendent Ged Noble
Northumbria Police statement about the publicity surrounding the Chelsey Wright case
