The brazenness of the sort of Islamic sex offenders that successive governments have lumbered the British people with never ceases to astonish me. Also both astonishing and sick-making are the often derisory and over-lenient sentences that these sex offending savages receive when they are eventually brought before the courts.
This case of a man named Mohammed (surprise, surprise) contains not only elements of extreme arrogance on the part of the offender, but also shows how Muslim sex offenders are getting sentences that really do not fit the crime.
The Ilford Recorder newspaper that covers the increasingly ‘Islamically enriched’ London Borough of Redbridge is reporting that in broad daylight and in the street, a Muslim man enticed a nine year old boy into sexual activity. This Islamic savage sexually assaulted the boy and was caught when police were trawling CCTV images whilst investigating another case. Here’s the Ilford Recorder article and as is usual policy for this blog the original text is in italics whereas this blog’s comments are in plain text.
The Ilford Recorder said:
A man who incited a young child to engage in sexual activity has been jailed for 10 months.
Firstly I have to ask: ‘Is that all he got?’ Ten months is not enough punishment either for the crime itself or the brazenness with which this Islamic savage carried it out. Having observed many court cases involving nonces I would have guessed that this paedo Mohammedan should have got at least two or more years imprisonment. Ten months isn’t a sentence, it’s a damned insult. I can’t help but wonder if a non Muslim who had committed a similar offence would have got such a notably lenient sentence.
The Recorder continued:
Mohammed Shabir, 49, of Ilford, was caught on CCTV engaging in sexual activity with the nine-year-old boy on a pavement near a parked vehicle in Ilford on March 25.
It seems to be that the most common name for sex offenders and nonces these days is ‘Mohammed’. Shabir obviously didn’t seem to think that there was anything morally wrong about assaulting a boy in the street. If he didn’t think this way he would have taken steps to hide what he was doing. It’s almost as if Shabir has an ideology that he follows, an ideology that doesn’t have many issues with paedophilia, an ideology called Islam.
He pleaded guilty in June to the charge of causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, and was sentenced at Snaresbrook Crown Court today, Friday, July 14.
Even taking the guilty plea into consideration this is a markedly lenient sentence for such an offence. It doesn’t appear to me to be a case where leniency of this sort could be legally or ethically justified. This is not a case of a very young person who doesn’t know right from wrong and neither does there seem to be any sort of mental retardation or other impairment that would have compromised Shabir’s moral compass.
Police began an investigation after footage of the incident was viewed by an officer investigating a different case.
The police are being kept quite busy in Redbridge these days what with all the ‘enrichment’ that the savagery of Islam has brought to that borough. Islamic rape, Islamic violence and Islamic drug crime is turning an area that decent working class people once aspired to live in, into a nasty shariah shithole.
Shabir was identified and was charged with the offence on June 14.
The only positive thing I can say about this case and the police and court’s handling of it is that it came to court quite quickly.
After the court case, Det Insp Laura Hillier, of the Met’s Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Command, said: “Mohammed Shabir is a very dangerous offender.
DI Miller, if this savage Shabir is so ‘dangerous’ then why did he only get ten months?
He targeted this young child and persuaded him to perform a sexual act on him in a public place during daylight hours. This is an unusual case where police were presented with video evidence of a sexual crime against a child whilst reviewing private CCTV for another case.
Again we should be asking the question of the judge, whose name the reporter, Lindsay Jones, omitted to mention, why if this case is so unusual and so brazenly and arrogantly committed, was this Islamic savage only given ten months?
“Detectives actively searched and located the young child victim in this case who bravely recounted what had happened to him. He and his family are being supported by professionals.”
I must say kudos to the police for making the effort to find Shabir’s nine year old victim. It makes a change from police force’s pushing Islamic sex crime under the carpet as has happened on all too many occasions in the UK.
Det Con Kiran Bratch, of the Met’s Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Command, said: “The Metropolitan Police are committed to investigating any such offences committed against children and will strive to bring any offenders to justice.”
Fine words from DC Bratch and fine sentiments of course, but how is it ‘justice’ for the courts to give this dangerous Islamic paedophile a sentence of only ten months? As I stated earlier there are no possible aspects of this case or from what I can gather about the defendant, that could possibly justify such a lenient sentence. It will be suspected by many when reading about this case that this piss poor sentence by the Judge at Snaresbrook Crown Court is yet another of the Islamic double-standard which exists in our policing, prosecution and court systems. This double standard sees Muslims who commit offences being dealt with far too leniently than how similar offenders from non Muslim backgrounds would be treated.
Apart from the insulting sentence that this latest Mohammedan sex case got this particular story highlights in stark relief the way that Muslim nonces commit crimes at will and with little thought of any potential punishment. This may partly be down to the knowledge that if the savages are caught then the Islam appeasing courts will just sentence them to a few months in a cushy Muslim dominated prison. This offence and the nature of it may also have at its root the fact that Islam doesn’t really have any sort of meaningful prohibition against paedophilia. There’s no specific religious bar on Muslims having sex with children and they seem to be remarkably unwilling to take on board the British view that sexually assaulting children is wrong.
The people of Redbridge are finding out, like the people of so many other towns and cities across the UK have already found out, that the more Islam that you have in your area, your nation and your society, then the more danger is posed to our children by Muslims who see nothing wrong with sexually assaulting nine year old boys and girls. Islam is a danger not just to our nation as a whole, but in particular Islam is a danger to our children on the grounds that this ideology teaches its followers that they should admire an emulate their religion’s founder, Mohammed a man who raped, murdered, stole and engaged in acts of paedophilia.
We in the modern world quite rightly feel disgust when we read about the paedophile orgies that the Roman Emperor Tiberius indulged in on the Isle of Capri and we can see how following or respecting such a man would debase those who did so. This would especially be the case if the individual emulated the sort of abusive and debauched behaviour of Tiberius, behaviour that was outrageous and disgusting even for its time. Therefore it is right that we start to see those who follow such an appalling individual as the Islamic ‘prophet’ Mohammed, who’s probably much worse than many Roman Emperors were, are probably as individuals who are going to emulate, not any good aspect of Mohammed’s character (if there was any that is), but many of the worst aspects of a man unworthy of being called a ‘prophet’.
This case is but one of many sex offence and rape cases that would not have occurred had this disgusting ideology called Islam been refused house room in civilised nations such as the UK. Those who opened the door to this backward death cult may have at best naively been unaware of the long history of Islam’s twisted male sexuality or at worst may have known about it and not have cared about the sex crime epidemic that the followers of Islam have brought to the UK.
This is a terrible crime, committed by the follower of a terrible ideology and the disgust that many of us feel when reading this story has been aggravated by the imposition of such a disgracefully lenient prison sentence on the offender. If you still think that Islam is not a threat to your children then you are a fool. The worsening problems of Islamic sex crime need to be tackled by the authorities immediately before we end up with a situation where none of our children can go anywhere for fear of being assaulted or raped by the followers of a murderous, thieving, seventh century nonce.
(Thanks to the sources in London who brought this story to this blog’s attention)
Link
