Details are starting to emerge about the violent Islamic savage who went mad with a samurai sword outside Buckingham Palace last week. Westminster Magistrates Court was told that the alleged assailant, Mohiussunnath Chowdhury, 26 an Uber driver from Luton had intended to attack the Queen’s residence at Windsor Castle but the moronic Muslim programmed his sat-nav wrongly and it took him to a pub called ‘The Windsor Castle’.
Here’s part of the court report from Breitbart written by Liam Deacon.
Mr Deacon said:
The man charged with a terrorist sword attack outside Buckingham Palace had written a note reading, “The Queen and her soldiers will all be in hellfire”, before launching the attack, a court has heard.
Bungling alleged would-be terrorist Mohiussunnath Chowdhury, 26, had actually intended to go to Windsor Castle but the taxi driver got lost after his satnav took him to The Windsor Castle pub instead.
So he changed plans and attacked London instead, “deliberately” driving at police outside the royal palace before reaching for the 4ft weapon when approached by unarmed officers on the evening of Friday, August 25th.
The British-born suspect of Bangladeshi heritage is accused of one charge of preparing terrorist acts, which carries a maximum life sentence.
Mr. Chowdhury, of Luton, was also revealed to be an Uber driver and his weapon was described as a samurai sword that was found in the passenger footwell of the blue Toyota Prius he was driving.
Due to the nature of the offences it is almost certain that this potentially dangerous Muslim will be committed to the Crown Court for trial. There is no indication from either the Brietbart coverage or from other publications as to whether Chowdhury will plead guilty or not guilty when he appears at Crown Court. Chowdhury was remanded in custody pending his future trial.
Because this is a sub judice case I cannot comment in too much detail about this actual case itself but it appears that many people may have been saved from serious harm or possibly death by the incompetence of the alleged assailant and the actions of the police outside Buckingham Palace. If he, or someone like him had gained access to Windsor Castle itself or to the military base that is near to the historic castle, then who knows what might have happened.
There have been several cases where dangerous or potentially dangerous Muslims have gone ‘full Islam’ and become violent but have been prevented from doing harm by their own stupidity. Although it’s good that the alleged mistakes made by the assailant prevented harm we cannot always rely on every dangerous Muslim being so completely moronic. Our security forces need to be aware that not every violent Muslim is as incompetent as this one is alleged to have been. The next time a Muslim decides to go ‘full Islam’ with a sword or some other weapon we may not be so lucky as we have been this time.
Links
Brietbart report on the bungling alleged terrorist who is said to have gone ‘full Islam’ outside Buckingham Palace in London
www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/01/buckingham-palace-sword-attacker-queen-soldiers-hellfire/
Daily Mail coverage of the same story
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4842216/Suspect-went-Windsor-Castle-GPS-sent-PUB.html
Sorry to be “picky” here, but you seem to have gone overboard on the idea that harm to the police and public was prevented because the assailant went to the wrong place. What is the relevance ? A man armed with a sword and intent upon maiming and murder is just as dangerous no matter where he gets out of his car to do it ! Your account seems to be based on the idea that the police and public at Windsor Castle were in some way an easier target than those at Buckingham Palace, and that had he gone there he could well have got in. What prevented the attack succeeding was the response of the officers on duty, not the locality, and I’m sure that the officers at Windsor Castle would have been just as effective.
I see that the court report contains the usual journalistic rubbish, claiming that a sword was “found in the footwell”. The accounts I’ve read say that the man attacked the police with a sword. So if he was outside the car attacking the police with it, it can’t have still been in the footwell, can it ? Also, you can’t possibly put something as long as a sword in the footwell of any vehicle, there simply isn’t the room between the front of the seat and the toe-board.
Journalists just pad their stories out with any old rubbish that comes into their heads – firstly as it fills up space, and secondly, they can then spend the next few days correcting their own errors under the heading “new facts have emerged”.
Hi there. No problem with being picky. Yes I completely accept your point that this savage could have done great harm wherever he had ended up whether that be a pub or an army barracks or a royal palace. As for the sword you also have point but I was taking this info from the original reports. Swords can vary in length and it may not have been wholly in the front seat between the seat and the bulkhead but may have been tucked down into the space between the doors and the seats (incidentally this is where I store four and five foot antennas when I temporarily remove them from the car). As regarding journalists bunging stuff in that is later corrected yes I’ve seen this happen and it’s got worse since we got 24 hour rolling news where stuff goes out with minimal checking.
I do however stand by the statement that stupidity on the part of some of these savages has been to our advantage on a number of occasions, but eventually we will see less of the stupid ones and more of the murderously effective ones.