Whilst much press attention and criticism has been directed at Ronald and Penelope Jones, the foster carers who took in the alleged Parsons Green ‘junior jihadis’, we should not take our eyes off those who enabled and encouraged Mr and Mrs Jones in their foolish endeavours. We should be aware that Mr and Mrs Jones didn’t suddenly appear out of some form of aether that miraculously spawns idiotic social justice warrior fools. This couple were part of a very large network of jihad enabling useful idiots both in the Surrey area and nationally, who are operating under the misapprehension that by taking in these violent savages pretending to be ‘refugee children’, they are doing some form of humanitarian act.
The foster couple of the alleged ‘junior jihadis’ in the Parsons Green case, Mr and Mrs Jones, appear to be intimately connected with an organisation called ‘Elmbridge CAN’ which I presume stands for Community Action Network. I’ve come across these ‘CAN’s’ before and some are genuine community organisations and some, like this one, are not. Elmbridge CAN presents itself to the world as a full-on ‘refugee’ importation outfit. Elmbridge CAN gives as one of its aims ‘settling refugees in Elmbridge’. Whether the people of Elmbridge really want these ‘refugees’ dumped on their area is a question that doesn’t seem to bother those involved in Elmbridge CAN one little bit.
Groups like Elmbridge CAN appear to care only for their ‘refugee’ pets and have no concern about what damage their ‘refugee pets’ may do to the quality of life in the local area, or even if their ‘pets’ threaten national security, as in the case of the two ‘junior jihadis’ allegedly involved in the Parsons Green incident.
When the press reports started to emerge about the involvement of the Jones’ and Elmbridge CAN, the Elmbridge CAN organisation temporarily shut down their website. The site is now back up and for many of us it’s clear that this organisation are not only heavily involved in dumping ‘refugees’ on the Elmbridge area but are also part of a national ‘City of Sanctuary’ network which is probably placing similar ‘junior jihadis’ in foster care or public housing elsewhere in the UK.
A brief look at the aims and objectives of Elmbridge CAN should give anybody concerned about jihadi terror, national security or Britain’s excessive migration levels a lot to be worried about. There’s a great irony here about their own self-description. They say that Elmbridge CAN want to ‘make a difference’ well, if they’ve had any involvement in placing the ‘junior jihadis’ with Mr and Mrs Jones, then they’ve certainly ‘made a difference’, although not a positive one to those injured in the Parsons Green attack. Here’s the ‘aims and objectives’ section for Elmbridge CAN along with my comments. As is usual policy for this blog the original text is in italics whereas this blog’s comments are in plain text. All of this data is taken from the Elmbridge CAN website which can be found at http://www.elmbridgecan.org.uk/
The Elmbridge CAN’s aims and objectives section says:
OUR AIMS
- Raising awareness
We help the residents of Elmbridge be aware of and sympathetic to the lives and needs of refugees.
In other words Elmbridge CAN are hawking round various sob stories about ‘child migrants’ to anybody who is prepared to listen. I wonder if Elmbridge CAN are telling the whole truth about the nature of their ‘refugee pets’ to the residents of Elmbridge? I also wonder how many local people thought that Elmbridge CAN were talking about orphaned toddlers or young children when they spoke about ‘refugees’ and have Elmbridge CAN left out the bit about the hulking great male Muslim jihadis that Mr and Mrs Jones seem to have ended up harbouring?
- Networking and partnerships
We facilitate collaboration, resource sharing and learning across local and national stakeholder groups to ensure the successful resettlement of refugees within Elmbridge.
Another relatively bland sounding sentence that, when you consider it, has ominous overtones. ‘Collaboration, resource sharing and learning’ across ‘stakeholder’ groups looks to me very much like an organised ‘refugee’ importation and support racket. There’s no listing in this section of their ‘stakeholder’ groups but we must assume that it contains similar like-minded naïve fools who see ‘child’ when the rest in the ‘reality centred community’ just sees a ‘burdensome potential jihadi’.
- Influencing
We engage in local and national advocacy and campaigning, supporting Elmbridge residents to influence our Government for the benefit of refugees.
This is exceptionally worrying and smacks of some of the tactics that groups like Citizens UK have used to persuade, lobby or coerce councillors and council officers into taking the sort of ‘refugees’ who may be making a misery of the lives of the communities that the ‘refugees’ are dumped on. Having groups like Elmbridge CAN, who have a naïve view of human nature and especially a naïve view of these ‘refugees’, influencing local and national government decisions is not good for the rest of us.
- Resources
We raise vital financial and material resources for refugee related needs both in Elmbridge and around the world.
Here’s the kicker for me, the part of this that really pisses me off. It’s what they are raising money for and spending it on that makes me, someone who has friends and relatives who have worked in the haulage industry, get really angry. When you dig down into the Elmbridge CAN website, you find that they have been raising money for all sorts of questionable ‘refugee’ related activities as one might expect, but they are also helping to feed and clothe the invaders in the migrant shanty towns in Northern France. Yes, Elmbridge CAN are collecting money and using it to provide food, hygiene packs and clothing to the very same thuggish invaders who are attacking British and foreign lorry drivers as they try to use the Channel ports. Not to put too fine a point on it, the well-fed Calais invader wielding a stick at a lorry driver or forcing their way into the loadspace of their vehicle, was probably fed and supported by these idiots at Elmbridge CAN. This shows me that they are an utterly disgraceful bunch of virtue signalling fools with no grasp on reality and especially the reality of being a professional driver who has to run the gauntlet of these invader savages posing as ‘refugees’ just to earn a crust.
This Elmbridge CAN lot don’t seem to care about the ordinary Britons of diverse races and religions whose lives and security may be endangered or degraded by their ‘refugee pets’. We saw from the story of the alleged ‘junior jihadis’ who were lodged at the home of Mr and Mrs Jones that some of the ‘refugee’ ‘children’ they fostered were troublesome. According to a report published yesterday (18/09/17) in Breitbart, a local councillor said that one of the ‘boys’ that the Mr and Mrs Jones fostered was ‘difficult’ and ‘aggressive’. I dread to think what it must have been like to be neighbours of Mr and Mrs Jones and their migrant foster ‘children’ and I would not be surprised to find out that the main cost of Mr and Mrs Jones’ altruism was being paid by the neighbours who may have had their quality of live degraded by the presence of these ‘migrant children’. I certainly would not want to live or have my child anywhere near any naïve ‘refugee’ huggers of the type which Mr and Mrs Jones seem to be.
If you can stomach it then why not take a look at the various web presences that Elmbridge CAN has and see for yourself just what they are involved in? You will weep that these people didn’t find anything better and more constructive to do with their time than import and impose these often dangerous ‘refugees’ upon the rest of us. I’d advise people not to contact this organisation, mostly because the sort of people who are involved in such ‘refugee’ importing are often immune to sensible criticism and live in a prison of ideology into which no common sense or intelligence will ever penetrate. The way to deal effectively with groups like this is to make sure we have politicians who will not listen to them or work with them and that needs to be done via the ballot box.
Here’s the links for Elmbridge CAN
Web: http://www.elmbridgecan.org.uk/
LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/company/elmbridge-can?trk=ppro_cprof
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/elmbridgecan
Unfortunately the ‘refugee’ importers and supporters of Elmbridge CAN are not alone in their short-sighted and socially damaging ‘refugees welcome’ actions. Elmbridge CAN are part of a wider network of pro-‘refugee’ activists that is operating nationwide called ‘City of Sanctuary’. This organisation is operating in a multitude of places across the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Some parts of the organisation, the West London Mentors chapter of City of Sanctuary for example, appear to have been set up with assistance and training from the large pro-migrant and pro-Islam charity Citizens UK (my my, isn’t this organisation at the heart of a LOT of murky ‘refugee’ importation projects?) City of Sanctuary are at their heart a ‘welcoming refugees’ organisation. That’s their whole reason for existence and they seem intent on promoting actions that achieve that goal, no matter how much damage it will do to British society, or to the security of the nation. It appears to matter not a bit to them that there may be damned good reasons for not welcoming certain individual refugees or those from certain cultures, all that matters to City of Sanctuary is that Britain props open its doors to to all and sundry, including those who have a propensity to explode.
City of Sanctuary has its roots in the Birmingham Sanctuary Conference of 2014 which, judging by the list of the founding organisations, was made up of groups who I would not trust to sit the right way round on a toilet, let alone judge whether their pet refugee ‘Mohammed’ who they are agitating to be allowed in, is likely to be a problem. The founding Sanctuary Conference was a diverse gathering of wet blanket peacenik Quakers, left-of-centre vicars and pastors, an assortment of ‘refugees welcome’ groups, public sector organisations, law centres, ethnic special interest groups and of course, a whole load of other representatives from the middle class Leftist wankerati.
Across the country you have local chapters of City of Sanctuary, many of which may be run by hard Leftists, those with a rose-tinted view of Islam, or those who are too naïve and stupid to be allowed out on their own. Such emotionally incontinent do-gooders with their indiscriminate humanitarianism are chasing what one right wing Rabbi once said was ‘the justice of fools’. Sadly it’s ordinary people who pay the price for these people’s altruism through increased crime, their ‘refugee pets’ often aggressive and alien religious ideologies, greater difficulty accessing pubic services and much a more atomised and in-cohesive society.
The City of Sanctuary group appears to be quite well funded. According to the 2015/16 financial statement for the organisation, they had an income of £214,801 in that year. They have had some significantly large grants made to them by charitable trusts including £50,000 from an organisation called ‘Unbound Philanthropy’ that has offices in London and New York and is an ‘invitation only’ funder, which appears to mean that you cannot put in speculative grant applications, unlike with some other funding bodies. ‘Unbound Philanthropy’ funds an awful lot of pro-migrant groups and projects and appears to be very left-leaning in its grant-making pattern. There’s lots and lots of refugee rights and migrant legal services and support groups in their list of grant recipients.
In the USA they have funded the Arizona Dream Act Coalition and in the UK Unbound Philanthropy money has found its way into the coffers of our old friends Citizens UK. Unbound Philanthropy have truly massive amounts of income and reserves, their website carries their US IRS tax statement which shows that in 2013 they had over US$180,000,000 in assets and an income of US$28,000,000. No wonder they can throw £50k at a troubling bunch of refugee agitators like City of Sanctuary.
City of Sanctuary are also getting money, another £50k from the Barrow Cadbury Trust which was set up by a member of the Quaker Cadbury chocolate family. The Barrow Cadbury Trust also funds an awful lot of pro-migrant, pro-‘refugee’ groups and various social justice causes. Further funding comes in the form of £30k from the Esme Fairburn Foundation. This grant making foundation was originally set up by one of the pioneers of unit trusts in order to ‘promote a greater understanding of economic and financial issues through education’. Unfortunately, and in a sad irony, since the death of Ian Fairburn, the original creator of the Foundation, this grant-making body has departed from their original admirable aims and now, along with funding some reasonable and worthwhile stuff, dishes out oodles of dosh to various left wing ‘social action’ projects. These including Operation Black Vote and a microfinance initiative that seems to think that funding a Muslim catering start-up was the best thing they could find to boast about.
Even the briefest read of the City of Sanctuary website shows us that this very well funded organisation is operating in a number of places where they are pushing local councils to take these ‘refugees’. They are also producing reports and undertaking actions that promote the idea that these ‘refugees’ should be prioritised by our already vastly overstretched and creaking National Health Service. For example they are whining that moves by new NHS regulations that are designed to crack down on health tourism will disadvantage ‘undocumented migrants’. ‘Refugees’ and people seeking asylum are already exempt from any NHS charges, information which will piss off many hard working Britons, who have to stump up vast amounts of tax to fund the NHS and who are not exempt from things like prescription charges. Despite the well known and observed pressures on the NHS, some of which is caused by excessive migration and health tourism, City of Sanctuary want our money to be spent on providing healthcare to those who have no right to be here and those who are slated for removal from the UK following asylum seeker status refusal. Do groups like City of Sanctuary understand that there is no such thing as an NHS money tree that will fund their illegal migrant ‘clients’? It’s our tax money that funds the NHS. If City of Sanctuary get their own way and manage with some shroud-waving ‘think of the refugee children’ campaign to get the NHS to pay for the healthcare of illegals then this money will come from healthcare budgets that should have been paying for the treatment of contributory Britons and not burdensome illegals. I don’t know about you but I’m pretty disgusted that an organisation like City of Sanctuary can get so much money from so many Leftist grant makers in order to promote the interests of those who are basically criminals who should not be here. If, in the future, you find yourself unable to access NHS facilities quickly or even at all because of ‘budget restrictions’ or ‘capacity issues’ then thank the likes of City of Sanctuary who seem to think that their criminal migrant pets deserve the healthcare for which YOU paid dearly.
City of Sanctuary are also worryingly successful in influencing local authorities to become ‘sanctuary’ areas and have encouraged these places to start to turn their districts into ‘places of welcome’ for ‘refugees’. They’ve already managed to get Colchester in Essex to sign up to become a ‘sanctuary borough‘. Although this may benefit City of Sanctuary’s ‘clients’, I very much doubt whether placing the sort of ‘refugees’ that we’ve seen so far will be of any benefit to the indiginous inhabitants of Colchester. They are also operative in the pretty Midlands town of Malvern, which is a nice place and really doesn’t deserve the sort of ambulant human sewage aka ‘refugees’, that their local City of Sanctuary chapter would like to impose on them. City of Sanctuary are also showering goodies on their ‘refugee’ clients whether these clients are here legally or not, which includes free tickets for the England football World Cup qualifier against Slovenia on October 5th at Wembley. It seems that pro-‘refugee’ groups have managed to strong-arm the Football Association into allocating a tranche of free tickets to ‘refugee and asylum seeker groups’.
Apart from the sheer effrontery of handing out tickets to a bunch of undeserving interlopers which could have been going to our own elderly, disabled or poor young football fans, this policy represents a security risk. How do we know that one of these ‘vulnerable refugees’ given free tickets to Wembley will not either use the ticket to gather intelligence on the Wembley Stadium for use in a future terror attack or they could go ‘full Islam’ and carry out an attack themselves during the England game?
Look no further than the malevolent do-gooders of City of Sanctuary if you are trying to find a group that thinks that importing a fifth column of potentially dangerous Muslims, on the grounds that these Muslims are saying they are ‘refugees’, is a good idea. Groups like City of Sanctuary take great pains to present the public with an unthreatening and mostly dishonest image of their work and those with whom they work. They promote the idea that the people who are their clients are merely desperate peaceful people, including many children, eager to find sanctuary from the man-made horror of war. The reality of these ‘refugees’ is often very different to the image promulgated by groups like City of Sanctuary. We’ve seen what has happened elsewhere in Europe and also in the UK when borders have been opened to hordes of Muslim men claiming to be ‘refugees’ or ‘unaccompanied child migrants’. The entry of these alleged ‘refugees’ caused an explosion in sexual offences against European women and children, an increase in crime, more Islamic terrorism and a more shattered and frightened society.
To conclude: Although it is plain for many of us to see, especially those of us who have lived among them, that these ‘refugees’ are often more trouble than they are worth and have sometimes brought nothing but heartache to the residents of the places where they’ve been placed. However, it is not our voices that are being heard in national and local government when it comes to these ‘refugees’. The loudest voices that are being directed at our local and national legislators and decision makers are coming from groups like Elmbridge CAN, City of Sanctuary and of course Citizens UK, sadly these groups seem to be being listened to. This is not good for the future of this country. This is because groups like those mentioned above contain a number of people who despise British and western culture, and have a rose-tinted and false view of Islam. They believe that Britain can support an infinite number of foreign free-loaders and will freely and gladly prioritise the rights of these ‘refugees’ over and above the rights of the communities, often poor communities that have to live with the ‘refugee pets’ of the middle class Left and the do gooders.
Whilst like many other reasonable and humane people I can see a moral imperative in supporting people who have been displaced by war, it would be better for all of us if this help was given to those so displaced in areas close to the conflict zones. This would be more fiscally advantageous for the nations providing aid as a dollar buys more aid in somewhere like Jordan or Lebanon than it does in a western nations like the UK or Germany. Only supplying local aid would avoid the security and crime problems, which groups like Elmbridge CAN and City of Sanctuary are aggravating, by importing large numbers of people from backward, incompatible, violent and antagonistic cultures into Western nations.
We can offer the necessary help to those afflicted by war without endangering our own nation and our own people by giving local aid and not letting these potentially dangerous ‘refugees’ enter and settle into the UK. Those of us with religious beliefs know that although we are often required and commanded by our deities to do good works and support charitable endeavours but we are not required to commit suicide in order to do so. Elmbridge CAN and City of Sanctuary are increasing the likelihood of Britons being murdered by Jihadi savages because of their policy of agitating for the import of many more of those who come from cultures where ‘killing the infidel’ is considered as morally worthy.
In a way the Parsons Green Islamic terror attack has been a wake up call for many about the true nature of some of the ‘child refugees’ that have been brought in by those who could reasonably be described as either malevolent or stupid. It has also exposed the vast well connected and well funded networks of Leftist ideologues and holy fools, that are acting against the common good of the nation, by importing and supporting who are no use to us in the present and may very likely present a threat in the future.
It should not be forgotten that the Muslim savage who murdered 22 people, mostly young people, at the Manchester Arena was the offspring of a man, himself an Islamist nutcase, whom Britain had previously generously given sanctuary to. Someone somewhere in the ‘refugees welcome’ movement or its predecessors, someone who may have lobbied for the entry of the Manchester bomber’s father, today has the blood of the innocents of Manchester on their hands. How much blood of future Britons will groups like Elmbridge CAN and City of Sanctuary eventually have on their hands when their ‘refugees’ suddenly decide after consulting the Koran of course, to turn on us and murder us?
For the sake of our own security and that of our offspring we need to be less welcoming to those claiming to be ‘refugees’ and who come from incompatible cultures. Groups like Elmbridge CAN and City of Sanctuary appear to care not one jot that the objects of their misplaced altruism may murder or attempt to murder Britons. All they seem to care about is polishing their own halos and getting as many of these dubious ‘refugees’ into the country as they possibly can. They continue to mindlessly virtue signal, despite the high cost that is being paid by Britons for the constant stream of thugs, political and religious extremists, rapists, freeloaders, criminals and fake ‘children’ that these groups are helping to import.
If there was one form of words that could be accurately used to describe the actions of groups like Elmbridge CAN and City of Sanctuary it would be a paraphrase of the words of the Biblical Prophet Isaiah who said ‘woe to them who call evil good and good evil’. But in the case of these and other pro-migrant and pro-‘refugee’ groups, they are doing an obvious evil by importing bad people from bad cultures, yet they are erroneously and perversely calling their actions ‘righteousness’. Groups like these need to be exposed, discussed and politically countered. This is because they are helping to destroy a nation with their foolishness and if left alone to fester and peddle their unwarranted and undue influence in our town halls and in Westminster and Whitehall, then they will succeed. There needs to be a peaceful democratic political movement targeted against these idiots because their ‘refugees welcome’ activities, as we can see from recent events, are going to end up causing many ordinary decent Britons an awful lot of grief.
Extra links
Brum sanctury conference
https://sanctuarysummit2014.wordpress.com/the-birmingham-declaration/
City of Sanctuary annual financial statement
https://cityofsanctuary.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ANNUAL-REVIEW-2015-16-FINAL.pdf
