My first thought when I saw that the mosque attended by the Islamic savage who murdered 22 people in Manchester had been sent a threatening letter containing a mysterious white powder was to think ‘Is this real or is it another fake hate crime?’ Because of the large number of faked ‘Islamophobic’ crimes that have been documented worldwide, at this stage we should not discount the possibility that someone at the mosque itself sent the letter in order to make people feel sorry for the Didsbury terror mosque and to divert attention from what people at this mosque have been doing.
The Didsbury Mosque in Manchester hit the headlines following the Manchester bombing in May 2017, when it was revealed that this nest of Islamic vipers had had as a congregant Salman Abedi the suicide bomber who killed British children and others at an Arianna Grande concert. It was also revealed by Tommy Robinson and others that the Didsbury mosque had a worryingly long record for promoting some pretty vile Islamic hate preachers. Despite the protestations of the mosque management that this was a peaceful mosque, the evidence showed otherwise.
According to reports in the Metro newspaper, the Didsbury terror mosque was put on lockdown after a threatening letter containing an unidentified white powder was sent to the mosque. The white powder is not thought to be suspicious but Greater Manchester Police and the local Fire Brigade initiated their usual ‘suspect chemical incident’ protocols, just in case the powder turned out to be harmful. As is usual policy for this blog, the original source text is in italics whereas this blogger’s comments are in plain text.
Metro said:
A mosque was placed on lockdown after worshippers received a threatening letter with a mystery white powder inside, witnesses said.
I’m not surprised that the police and other emergency services followed strict procedure in this instance as at the time the nature of the powder was not known. But, reading the accounts by the alleged ‘witnesses’ it does seem that they are talking up the severity of this incident, something that makes me suspicious.
Police set up a cordon around the Didsbury Mosque and Islamic Centre in Manchester, which was previously attended by Manchester Arena suicide bomber Salman Abedi.
If this is a genuine attack on the mosque and not merely a fake attack done by those connected to the mosque itself for reasons of taqiyya, then all I can say, apart from condemning the sending of mysterious white powders, is that the attackers didn’t choose an innocent mosque. If this was a real and not a fake attack, whoever did this may well have been angry at a mosque that hosted those who promote religious violence and oppression as well as being the place of worship of the worst Islamic mass murderer that Britain has seen so far in 2017.
However, a spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said the incident is being treated as ‘low risk’.
This case is looking more and more suspicious especially as the police are treating this incident as ‘low risk’. After all if you were a Muslim trying to gain sympathy for your mosque and divert negative attention away from the dodgy activities of the mosque, then you probably would not fake a crime using a dangerous chemical just in case it injured one of your own.
It is not yet known what the white substance was and if it is harmful.
According to a brief websearch I did for any updates, the police at this stage have not released any detail about the white powder. At present, it is not known whether this powder was genuinely dangerous or whether it was a prankster sending talcum powder or similar stuff to the mosque. I can’t help thinking that if this stuff was genuinely poisonous or harmful, then the police would be screaming from the rooftops for other mosques to watch out for similar incidents. That they have not done this means the jury is still out as to whether this was a genuine incident of intimidation or merely more Islamic taqiyya.
Emergency service workers wearing protective suits and breathing apparatus could be seen coming in and out of the building.
This sounds dramatic but is now standard procedure when a chemical incident of any type is reported.
If this incident is genuine, which at this stage many people will have doubts about, then we should ask just what might have triggered someone to threaten this mosque? It could be that someone was angry that this mosque, a mosque that had not only hosted hate preachers and a mass murderer, had given the Manchester murderer’s father an honoured position in the mosque’s religious life. It could also be that someone may have been angry that following the Manchester Arena bombing, Greater Manchester Police, instead of doing the right thing and closing down or shaking down this terror mosque, used scarce police resources to guard the mosque from citizens righteously angry about the mosque’s connection with the bomber’s family. It must have pissed off many non-Muslim people to see that here was yet another mosque where extremism was preached and a terrorist was given sanctuary, yet the police were protecting the mosque and not the ordinary British citizens who are increasingly put at risk by the sort of sedition and violence preached in mosques like Didsbury.
I recognise that it must have been frightening for those in the mosque to receive a threatening letter and white powder, but it must be said that this is only a fraction as frightening or as damaging as being in the vicinity of the self exploding savage Salman Abedi, whose family this mosque brazenly tolerated. Whether this alleged incident is taqiyya or terrorism only time will tell. Of course I condemn the sending of threats and suspicious powders to mosques as it can be counterproductive as well as being wrong, but if the Didsbury terror mosque are facing peaceful public opprobrium and criticism for their behaviour (which I believe they are), then it is something that this mosque has brought on itself.
Following the Manchester bombing, Greater Manchester Police went into Islamopandering overdrive which must have pissed off some people. Because of that it is regrettable but not surprising, assuming that is if this case is genuine, if some people became so angry at both the mosque and the police Islamopandering, that they decided to cross both the moral and legal lines. I hope, if this is a genuine attack that is, that this is a ‘one off’ incident. However, I suspect that because of the State failing to get a proper grip on Britain’s Islam problems, then we might get more vigilante actions, especially when the police are perceived, rightly or wrongly, to take the side of Muslims following an act of Islamic terror.
I do hope that we are not seeing an uptick of Vigilante action against mosques and Islamic property as this will only make things worse by causing tit for tat violence and will give the various Islamic grievance mongers something real (for a change) to moan about. Vigilantism is a sign that normal law and order and normal decent politics is breaking down, something I do not wish to see. But, it is vigilante action with all the capriciousness and injustice that comes with such action, that we will get if terror mosques like Didsbury and other similar extremism linked Islamic institutions are not harshly dealt with by the legitimate and elected authorities. Islam in the UK needs to be dealt a massive blow to its psyche and to its power, but these blows must, if we believe in democracy, come from the forces of a government chosen by Britons and acting in the interests of Britons, not from mobs of angry men with flaming torches.
