Police officers are human and as such they are subject to the same sorts of human failings as the rest of us. Because of that we cannot expect perfection in our police officers and some officers have misbehaved and been brutal or have distorted evidence against innocent people. But we should expect at the very least that these failings by officers are punished and steps taken to prevent such abuses happening again. What we should not expect to see are senior officers, in this case one of the most senior police officers in the kingdom, engaging in outright and obvious lies in order to deceive the public as to the nature of a particular crime problem such as Islamic Rape Gangs.
I speak on this occasion of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick who recently made the claim whilst being questioned at London’s City Hall by Peter Whittle the UKIP London Assembly Member, that organised sex gangs are not a recent phenomena brought to our shores by the followers of Islam, but have been going on for centuries. This is an astounding degree of dishonesty on the part of the Commissioner. Whilst it is true that sex offenders of all types have existed throughout history, the instances of members of one group targeting the members of another group for the purposes of rape and sexual abuse are rare and have only occurred when Britain or its precursor and constituent nations, has either been invaded by the likes of the Danes, Romans and Normans, or when there have been periods of social upheaval and breakdown.
Also Britain has, by dint of its religious, political and imperial history had religious and ethnic minorities openly living in its borders since at least the readmission of the Jews in 1656. Since then Britain has accepted people from a number of different religious, ethnic and cultural backgrounds ranging from Huguenots through West Indians to Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims.
The vast majority of the members of these groups have either fully embraced the Judaeo-Christian Enlightenment cultural ethos of Britain or have lived peacefully and quietly as Hindu Britons, Jewish Britons, Sikh Britons or whatever. Of course each community has produced both heroes and villains, the law abiding and the criminal, but we have not seen members of the non Islamic religious or cultural groups go out and deliberately target the women and children of other faiths and those from the majority community for the purposes of sexual exploitation. We have only seen this with the followers of Islam and it is highly disingenuous of Commissioner Dick to state that we’ve lived with the problem of these grooming gangs for centuries. In effect Commissioner Dick is distorting and lying about history in order to divert public attention away from the ongoing and worsening problems of Islamic Rape Gangs.
We have not had provable historical accounts of gangs of Jews or Frenchmen or those from the large numbers of Anglo Germans who settled here following the ascension of the Hanoverian monarchical dynasty treating British girls as chattels to abuse, rape or traffick. We do not see rape gangs or grooming in Chaucer or Shakespeare or any other credible historical or literary source to my knowledge. The problem of one religious and cultural group sexually exploiting members of another group on such a massive scale as we’ve seen in recent decades is primarily down to the importation of Islam an ideology that has a very poor view of women in general and non Muslim women in particular. The historical record especially crime records do not confirm Commissioner Dick’s claim that these grooming gangs have always existed. For example: It only takes a brief look at the statistics for executions carried out in England and Wales in the 19th century to see that gang rape was being punished but it was a relatively rare crime, unlike today. In addition there were other executions for rapes of adult women and of children which shows that this crime was being punished. For example in England and Wales during the period of 1800 to 1827 there were 98 men hanged after being convicted of the rape of both adult women and of children. Out of this figure of 98 only a small number, six. of these cases involved more than one defendant attacking a single victim. In addition between 1827 and 1836 in England and Wales, after which rape ceased to be a capital offence, there was only a couple of cases where there was multiple perpetrators and a single victim in a rape case
Also these figures do not indicate that there was ‘grooming’ going on in connection with these rapes as Commissioner Dick dishonestly contends, these offences look to me like the sort of rapes and child abuse that can occur in any society. In all the data that I’ve looked at pertaining to the 19th Century a period when UK records are reasonably reliable, there is no sign that the victims were chosen because of their ‘out-group’ status as is the case with the modus operandi of the Islamic Rape Gangs which we the people can see, but which Commissioner Dick patently and obviously refuses to see.
I was utterly disgusted to see the way that Commissioner Dick behaved in front of the panel of Assembly members and in particular the way that she bobbed and weaved to avoid mentioning the role of Islamic culture in the phenomenon of today’s organised rape gangs. Commissioner Dick’s attempt to rewrite history is at once both disgraceful and totally and provably false. Although there have always been rapists and individual men who would entice women and sometimes children with promises of everything from marriage to wealth in order to persuade them into sexual activity, we have not seen, to anything like the extent as we see today, the sort of gangs that specifically target girls and women from another community for sexual abuse. Jews don’t do it, Sikhs don’t’ do it, Hindus or Buddhists or followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster don’t do it, only the followers of Islam a fascistic ideology that is built on hatred of the other, commit such monstrous crimes in the numbers that they do.
Commissioner Dick could have chosen to be honest about the situation regarding Islamic Rape Gangs and been honest enough to admit that such a problem could be occurring in London, she would have earned many plaudits from the public if she had done so. Unfortunately Commissioner Dick did not take the path of honesty in her response to Mr Whittle at the London Assembly, instead she fell back into the dishonesty of ideology. Commissioner Dick chose the ideology of multiculturalism and a policy of Islamic appeasement and engaged in blatant falsification of history in her attempt to tell the British public both that there are no such things as Islamic Rape Gangs and that such crimes have been part of British culture for centuries.
The performance of Commissioner Dick in front of London Assembly members is notable for one significant thing. This marks the moment when a senior police officer indeed one of the most senior, publicly changed sides and chose to protect not British citizens of all races and faiths, but instead chose to protect an Islamic culture that daily produces men who see preying on the vulnerable as socially and religiously acceptable.
Commissioner Dick has chosen to collaborate, with all the negative connotations that this word has, with the ideology of Islam even to the extent of denying the crimes that this ideology’s followers commit. She has chosen to protect the perpetrator community from both the full force of the law (this is obvious from her failure to address the problem directly) and of deserved and morally justifiable public opprobrium rather than protect the innocent. Commissioner Dick makes a mockery of the phrase carved in stone above the old doors to the Central Criminal Court in London ‘Defend the children of the poor and punish the wrongdoer’.
This is not justice and this is certainly not just and honest policing. If in the future historians chronicling the conflict between Islam and the West need an example of a senior British public official that could be identified easily as Britain’s ‘Benedict Arnold’, then they will probably quickly point to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick. I cannot trust a police officer who refuses to tell the truth especially when it comes to the matter of Islamic Rape Gangs and therefore following her appearance in front of the Assembly members, I find that I cannot trust Commissioner Cressida Dick. Britons are being ruled and policed by those like Commissioner Dick who rarely have the best interests of the majority population and of the peaceful settled religious and cultural minorities at heart and it is unlikely that our rulers and police will change their tunes and stop Islamopandering any time soon. The situation will continue to get worse with regards police officers who are plainly bent towards Islam such as Commissioner Dick and with politicians who continue to utter the dishonest invocation ‘Islam is a religion of peace’, unless we use the powers that we all have to force peaceful and just change via the ballot box and via peaceful and creative protest.
We cannot trust our current politicians to wake up to the ongoing and worsening threat of Islamic aggression. We must instead replace them at the earliest opportunity with politicians who will be aware of the problems that have been both imported and nurtured by Britian’s political classes. I doubt that Cressida Dick would have been allowed to faff and fail to identify the root cause of a problem at which Islam is at the core if she was a Polish or Hungarian senior police officer and it says a lot about how culturally and ideologically remote our police officers have become from the people and also how corrupted by political correctness our public organs are, that she could get away with such statements and historical falsehoods in the City Hall of the capital city of the United Kingdom. We should be ashamed that this woman is Met Commissioner and work to ensure that we are governed by those who will make sure that an ideologue like Cressida Dick never again is allowed to occupy such a high office.
