The idea that diversity for the sake of diversity is something to be admired and aimed for has been one that has been little short of disastrous. It has seen the ludicrous situation where people appointed to positions of authority and responsibility not on the grounds of merit, but on the spurious grounds that they possess the correct skin colour, genitalia, sexuality. Enforced diversity has also seen the growth of violent imported ideologies like Islam which despite having had several generations for its adherents in Britain to become civilised, stubbornly refuses to do so. ‘Diversity’ represents much more a noisome stench in a society rather than a strength. To call ‘diversity’ a strength is an outright lie as divided societies riven with special rights or legal treatment for this or that group, are likely to be too fractured to deal with any existential challenges that may come its way.

A good example of the sort of problems brought to Britain by the ideology of diversity comes from the now heavily Islamised London Borough of Newham. In that borough a primary school head teacher, someone who is very well informed about Islam, decided that Muslim girls under eight years old were not to come to school wearing hijabs. This was a correct decision as the hijab goes far beyond the requirements for modesty found in other religions such as Christianity and Judaism. This is because the hijab is primarily a device used to indicate to men that here is a woman who is not sexually available and who is a believing Muslim. There is a sexual cultural element in the hijab which in my view makes it a wholly inappropriate garment to put a pre-pubescent child into. It is also a garment that unlike the Nuns habit or the Sheitel wigs worn by some married Jewish women has less to do with modesty or as an indication of religious belief and is much more to do with indicating a Muslim woman’s second or third class social status.

It’s correct to say no to children wearing hijabs for all sorts of reasons, not sexualising children and promoting the equality of women being but two of them. The tale of the Newham headteacher and the aftermath of it makes seriously disturbing reading. Following the banning of hijabs for under eights, in part in order to promote social cohesion, the headteacher, Neena Lal came under intense local pressure from angry and volatile Muslims and following the resignation of the chair of governors the ban on children in hijabs was lifted.

The aggressive and frankly disgusting Islamic mentalcases who forced the school to accept children in hijabs then turned their attention onto Ms Amanda Spielman the chief inspector of the school standards agency OFSTED. The Chief Inspector backed the rights of Ms Lal and other head teachers to set school uniform policy. For this action Ms Spielman, a person whose religious affiliation is at the time of writing not known, was tagged as a ‘Jew’ by presumably Muslim Jew haters. I say this is presumed as I can’t imagine that this specifically Islamic issue would have much traction with or interest from the non Muslim Jew haters in, for example, the alt-Right. The name Speilman may or may not be of Jewish origin, it could be the name of an atheist, a Jew a Christian or a Buddhist. It could even be from the family name of one of the numerous Germans of all faiths who migrated to the UK in the 19^th century and who lived a hard working but free life up until some Britons turned against them during the First World War (people perceived to be fifth columnists are never popular even when the perception may be incorrect).

Ms Spielman has according to the Jewish Chronicle newspaper been subjected to some anti-Semitic abuse and although this abuse is in my opinion at the lower end of seriousness, it’s where it may be coming from that concerns me. In any event at the end of the day these are just words nothing more and nothing less. Nearly everyone can speak and some can speak sense and some speak bollocks and it is better that the bad speak freely so they can be challenged than have controlled speech.

The targeting of Ms Spielman should concern us as it does indicate that there is a culture of anti Jewish conspiracy theories that is alive and well and has a lot of support among Muslims. Hostility to Israel and its fight against Islamic terrorists is overlaid by some Muslims onto the pre-existing history of Jew hatred in Islam. In Islam and among many Muslims, whenever something goes wrong or their desires are thwarted, there’s an anti Jewish conspiracy theory that can be trotted out to explain the problem. Islam is a culture that never self examines and never blames itself as it’s easier to ‘blame the Jews’ for whatever has gone wrong. This applies even when there are situations where the followers of Islam are the architects of their own destruction as in the degradation of places like Pakistan or the lack of peace and development in much of the Islamic world. Too many Muslims look at the shitholes both geographically and culturally that Islam creates and say: ‘The Jews did this’ and never look for the real reasons for their troubles, which is so often the society and mindset that their own Islamic belief system has built.

The Spielman/Lal case should be a wake up call to all of us. It should wake people up to the danger posed by Islamic intimidation some of which is likely to be violent. We should not be in the position where these savages can dictate to the rest of us by screaming and shouting and waving their fists about how we should run our nation. This case also opens up to public scrutiny what nature of what Islam really is. This case shows Islam to be an aggressive, arrogant and self entitled religious monoculture that does not coexist with the beliefs of others but works damn hard to drive out those who challenge Islam and who believe differently from Islam. If they cannot compromise on the idea of putting a sexually charged garment on a young girl child, something that should really be a no brainer, how can we honestly expect them to be loyal to the UK and not give succour and support to this nation’s enemies?

The intimidation of this apparently good quality Newham headteacher by local Islamic savages has been brought to the Newham area by the much vaunted but ultimately destructive doctrine of ‘diversity’. Along with the intimidation, violence and arrogance that has been expressed in this case towards the headteacher herself, there has also been accusations that the person backing the head at Ofsted was part of some ‘Jewish plot’. We don’t need this sort of Islamic mentalists of the sort who have clambered out of the gutter over this incident, they have brought no true or positive ‘enrichment’, they have only got from them violence, rape, aggression, troubles and the rabid Jew hate that is a common feature of Islamic nations and communities around the world. We don’t need this crap here, we don’t want it here, it’s time that it was heavily cracked down on, although I will not hold my breath waiting for our current crop of Islam appeasing politicians and police to do so.

Diversity stinks and in Newham the smell of this failed policy is more noisome that ever which emanated from that area’s gasworks, docks or factories, when it was those industries, rather than being a warehouse of welfare funded Muslims, for which this borough was once known for. Islam has ruined Newham, it has turned it from a mixed working class area into a horrific shariah zone and I doubt that the intimidation of an innocent headteacher will be the last we will hear of Newham’s aggressive and frankly unwanted Muslim residents.