I’ve featured the work of Ash Sharp of the Republic Standard on here before and I would strongly urge you to go and peruse their work as it is sharp and well informed Mr Sharp has recently weighed into the murky and in many cases thoroughly bent world of Britain’s ‘hate speech’ laws and also takes a look at the ‘Islamopandering’ that our police forces indulge in which include failing to tackle the growing problem of Female Genital Mutilation.

Mr Sharp quite rightly opens his piece with an observation about how life in Britain is starting to mimic art, or rather satire. He draws attention to the spoof Cuckex Police account that operates on both the Twitter and the Gab social media platforms. He did this it seems in order to highlight a particularly egregious example of pussy footing around Islam by Surrey Police. What was shocking about this case and which Mr Sharp quite rightly points out is that whilst Surrey Police are failing to tackle the issue of Female Genital Mutilation in Islamic communities they are simultaneously showing their force to be actively gathering intelligence about furious citizens angry about the force’s Islamopandering. This really is one of those stories where we have a case of the ‘fury’ in the form of the general public angry at the ‘filth’ in the form of Surrey Police who seem to believe that people saying nasty things about Islam is more worthy of attention than Muslim girls having their clitorises removed with a dirty razor blade.

After highlighting the satirical humour of the Cuckex Police account Mr Sharp said:

Unfortunately, Cuckex Police have been outdone (yet again) by the real police force. The topic this time is one that has been at the forefront of many minds of late due to the severity of the crime and that the victims are young girls. Female Genital Mutilation is a significant problem in the United Kingdom, particularly among Muslim communities from the Middle East and Africa. The government estimates over 170,000 women and girls in the country, but since 1985 only one prosecution has ever been brought– and both defendants were cleared.

Mr Sharp then decried the barbarism that is FGM and how the ‘useless’ British police have failed to tackle this mostly Islamic problem. Police forces, including that of Surrey, make all the right sounding noises about not tolerating FGM but the reality is that they do the square root of sod all about it, after all the priority for Mr Plod these days seems to be keeping the Muslims happy and unmolested by the application on them of British law. Mr Sharp then contrasted the worthless virtue signalling of Surrey Police by them highlighting the fact that the 6^th February was International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM, with the zeal which Surrey Police is chasing ‘Islamophobia’ suspects.

Apparently, Surrey Police’s little bit of virtue signalling about the FGM that they, like other police forces will do nothing to stop, attracted a fair amount of criticism. This criticism also, quite correctly to my mind, included denunciations of the Islamic ideology that mostly sustains the atrocity of FGM in the UK.

Following on from Surrey worthless and empty virtue signalling over the matter of Zero tolerance for FGM day and the barrage of criticism that both they and the ideology of Islam had got, they put out the following Tweet.

I find it utterly astonishing that a police force can scramble an intelligence team to examine a few people saying nasty, but probably true, things about Islam whilst obviously doing nothing about something that has become, thanks to the unwanted injection of Islam into our society, a major child abuse problem. The fact that Surrey Police so obviously choose to prioritise what some may see as disagreeable speech about Islam over so much else, and a time of resource pressures, should disgust any Briton reading Surrey Police’s tweet.

Mr Sharp in his article said that he examined many of the counter Islam tweets and those critical of Surrey Police and he said that he didn’t find any of the four hundred odd Tweets that he examined that could reasonably be described as ‘hate speech’. However, the response of Surrey Police in immediately going after the ‘Islamophobes’ rather than accepting what in other jurisdictions, such as the USA for instance, could be seen as reasonable criticism of both the police and Islam, should be seen by Britons as fundamentally sinister.

With respect to the criticism in the Tweets that had been aimed at Surrey Police and how it was dealt with Mr Sharp added:

There is a hefty amount of criticism of the UK government, of the police, and of Islam. Luckily for decent and normal British people everywhere the social media intern at Surrey Police knew just what to do in this situation. That’s right. Report everyone for Islamophobia and begin files on them so that charges may be brought at a later date.

It really is sinister on a deep and worrying level that a police force, a body of men and women who are paid to protect all of us, seem to spend such an inordinate amount of time and resources protecting Muslims and too often only Muslims. I cannot think of any other minority religious community which has as many bestial practises so widely carried out as is coming from Britain’s Muslim community. If it was Hindus, Sikhs, Jews or even Methodists who were slicing off little girls clitorises with rusty razors then you can bet your bottom dollar that the police would be in there with all guns blazing. Similarly with the way that the police have dealt with Britain’s epidemic of Islamic sex crime and with the jihad promotion that is going on in some of Britain’s mosques. If it was any other faith group or race group that was engaging in mass rape or were calling for the murder of gays in their places of worship then again we could expect swift action from our police forces, even that of Surrey.

Sadly, because of the rampant ‘Islamopandering’ coming from forces like Surrey, crimes and abuses committed by Muslims are not treated with the seriousness that they treat the phantom ‘crime’ of ‘Islamophobia’. Crimes and anti social behaviour by Muslims end up either ignored, excused or only half-heartedly prosecuted when the public become so disgusted with the crimes and the police’s lack of action against them, that it becomes impossible for them not to act or at least look as if they are doing something.

We in Britain used to have police forces that we could be proud of, they were not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, but they got results, kept us safe and most importantly policed us all by consent. With today’s police forces things are now very different. The ordinary non Muslim Briton cannot now trust the police to act in an equitable manner without prejudice towards them and prejudice in favour of Muslims. The Islamopandering by various forces of which Surrey’s is merely the latest, shows us that not only can we not trust our police any more per se, but that some forces only police by consent the Islamic communities and disregard and are not interested in the consent of the rest of us. With forces like Surrey screaming ‘Islamophobia’ is it any wonder that more ordinary, decent and law abiding British subjects and patriots are starting to refer to the police by a nickname that they may not have even considered using in the past, the word ‘Filth’.

Link

Read the full article on Surrey Police and their twisted priorities via the link below.

https://republicstandard.com/uk-police-fail-fgm-victims-islamophobic-tweets/