Britain is afflicted by ‘Neville’s’ in positions of authority. These ‘Neville’s’ (named after pre war British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and a particularly disgusting appeaser of Islam that this blog once encountered) continuously appease Islam. These ‘Nevilles’ grant Islam and its followers special advantageous privileges, sweep the crimes committed by Muslims under the carpet and studiously ignore the horrific hatred that is Islamic theology. These ‘Nevilles’ do all their power to avoid having to confront the fact that Islam is not a religion of peace and is additionally a threat to all of us.
These appeasers seem to have bought into the false idea that if public money, legal protections and special privileges are showered on Islam and its followers then these Muslims will not turn round and kill us. This idea is as dangerous and as laughable as former Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain thinking that maybe, after ripping up other peace agreements, that Adolf Hitler would abide by one more peace treaty and there would be a lasting peace.
In a way many of today’s Quislings for Islam in Parliament, police, judiciary, local authorities, the third sector and in the Civil Service are engaging in appeasement that is worse than anything that Neville Chamberlain or those supporting him did in the 1930’s. Chamberlain at least was realistic in his assessment of Hitler being a threat and the doomed peace attempts did buy Britain vital time to rearm. Today’s appeasers of Islam often, as in the case of today’s ‘British Neville Award’ winner, a senior police officer, are not only unwilling to take action against Islamic crime, disorder and sedition, but refuse to even name it. This particular ‘Neville’ has even tried to tell us that we’ve always had Islamic style problems even when we’ve had no Islam here.
One person who has, when being interviewed by members of the London Assembly, decided to appease Islam by being less than honest about the problems that it has brought to Britain is the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick. Commissioner Dick, whose previous claim to fame was overseeing the armed response police team that killed an innocent Brazilian electrician after mistaking him for an Islamic terrorist, sat in front of Assembly Members and spouted complete unhistorical guff about Islam and it’s relation to the grooming gang problem.
Back in January this blog published a piece entitled ‘The moment a top cop switches sides’ which looked at Commissioner Dick’s claim that gang grooming is not a recent phenomenon in Britain and that Muslims and Islam cannot be blamed for creating this problem. In this piece I conceded that there have been times in British history when members of one group have targeted the women of another group for rape and sexual assault, but I also stated that these have been times of invasion, war and extreme social upheaval. Picking on the members of one group for sexual assault is not and has not been a normal part of British peacetime life, not that is until we imported the ideology of Islam whose followers seem too often addicted to raping non Muslim children and young women. In addition I compared Islam to other groups that have migrated here since Britain became multi-religious with the readmission of the Jews in 1656 and how none of these groups have produced anything like the high number of bestial sexual savages as Britain’s Islamic communities have produced and continue to produce.
Commissioner Dick’s claim that the sort of Rape Gangs that seem to occur in any area where there is a Muslim community can be shown to be a lie by looking at the historical record. In the original piece linked above I looked at the figures for people executed for the crime of rape from 1800 up until 1836 when rape ceased to be a capital offence. What I found was that between 1800 and 1827 there were 98 men executed for rape but only six of these cases involved more than one offender attacking a single victim. In short I found nothing like today’s phenomenon of Islamic Rape Gangs when I looked at the 19th century a period that had both relatively good criminal justice record keeping and which was a period of social, political and economic upheaval where you may expect poverty to sometimes make beasts of normally decent men. The fact is there has been nothing that is directly similar to what we’ve experienced from Islamic Rape Gangs in the past.
Commissioner Dick uttered a falsehood in the council chamber when questioned by Peter Whittle of UKIP. She denied that Islamic Rape Gangs were a problem in London when there are all the demographic and cultural factors present in London that tell us that there surely must be Islamic Rape Gangs operating there. On the video, which is available via the previous article and via JihadWatch, Commissioner Dick bobbed and weaved and desperately tried to avoid linking Islamic culture, a highly fascistic and misogynistic one, with Islamic sex crime. Commissioner Dick attempted to falsify history by stating that these rape gangs and sex grooming has always been a problem when the records show that violent rape gangs, especially ones that target members of specific ‘out’ groups, have not been anything like the problem that they are today.
Met Police Commissioner Cressida Dick
When I watched the video of Commissioner Dick spouting anti-historical nonsense and hiding behind the provably failed ideology of multiculturalism, I was immediately struck by the thought that this is a senior police officer who we cannot trust. Senior officers like Commissioner Dick who refuse to honestly acknowledge not just the scale of a problem but even the mere existence of a problem, are not fit for the office they hold.
What came over most strongly in the video was that Commissioner Dick was behaving more like Collaborator Dick when the questioning touched on the matter of where these rape gangs were coming from. She did everything possible during questioning to avoid saying what so many ordinary people know and which far too many British families have experienced, which is that Muslim men have, because of their culture and the ideology that they follow, a propensity for sex crimes.
Commissioner Dick could have done the right thing by all Britons, no matter their race or faith, and been honest about the existence of the Islamic Rape Gang problem. Instead Commissioner Dick sadly and shockingly chose the path of evasion and untruth when quizzed on this matter. Commissioner Cressida Dick of the Metropolitan Police gave all the appearance of being an ardent appeaser of Islam and is therefore a suitably unworthy winner of this blog’s British Neville Chamberlain Award for Islamic appeasement.
The sort of appeasement of Islam that was engaged in by Commissioner Dick and by many others in authority is in a way much more morally bankrupt than the appeasement of Hitler by Chamberlain and others. Back then foolish and misguided politicians thought they were buying peace and at least these failed peace attempts provided time for society to prepare or war with the aggressor. But, the likes of Cressida Dick are not even getting that. They are not getting peace with Islam by this appeasement as Islam will always want more no matter how much is given, it’s a gangster ideology with a gangsterish mentality. The appeasers are certainly not by any stretch of the imagination buying time in order to prepare for a fight back. Instead this appeasement by Commissioner Dick and others will bring nothing but violence and misery to Britons who will continue to suffer from the crime, disorder and sedition that the ideology of Islam has brought here.
Islam encourages its male adherents to rape women whom they perceive as ‘war booty’, this is in the Islamic theological writings that underpin Islam. The question I find myself asking of Cressida Dick is why does she find it so difficult to understand that a religion that says raping captives is permitted might be more likely to produce rapists and other sex criminals? Sadly, this is a question that would fully expect Commissioner Dick to flatly refuse to answer. Cressida Dick fully deserves the public opprobrium and criticism that her performance in front of the London Assembly has brought to her door.
Here’s the ‘Neville Certificate’ for this particularly useless senior police officer.
I’d like to remind this blog’s readers that if they do engage in one to one criticism of Commissioner Dick say or example on social media or by writing to Scotland Yard to complain, then critics should take every step to ensure that: a) They are not arrested for some dubious ‘hate speech’ crime by her crack team of Islam pandering ‘hate speech’ detectives for pointing out Ms Dick’s abject appeasement; and b) that critics keep all communications with her and her staff legal, decent, honest and truthful. By following the latter instruction you the citizen will be behaving in a damn site better way than officers like Ms Dick have treated the rest of us.
