In a way, we in Britain are lucky that the ‘refugee’ accused of involvement in the Parsons Green bomb attack, Ahmed Hassan, has denied the charges put before him. If he had pleaded guilty to the charges of attempted murder and causing an explosion, then we may not have heard as many of the details about this savage and his mindset, given in open court. If he had admitted to the crimes that he has been accused of, then we also may not have known about the massive amounts of incompetence, naivety and malevolence that the State, the charity sector and the ‘refugees welcome’ types showed this savage in the run up to the Parsons Green explosion.

When you read about the obvious chances that there were to see that this savage was likely to be a problem, chances that were missed and the way that charities seemed to protect him from the State and not protect us from him, then you, like I will probably get angry. There appeared, from reading reports of the ongoing trial of Hassan, numerous occasions when this savage could have been seen as a potential wrong ‘un and either detained or better still deported.

The first is from when Hassan was interviewed by immigration officials from the Home Office. Hassan told them that he had been ‘trained to kill’ by ISIS in Iraq. The savage also told immigration officials that he had been recruited by ISIS and had served with them for three months. Despite this admission Hassan was still let into the United Kingdom and allowed to live among us, even though someone admitting fighting for ISIS should have been treated as a potential threat. Hassan was also allegedly spotted by his media tutor at Brooklands College in Surrey ‘acting strangely’ along with having ISIS type material on his phone and being in possession of a video showing another phone being destroyed in an explosion. Because of these instances where Hassan had caused concern, he had been referred to the government’s PREVENT scheme in order to redirect him away from extremism. This referral to PREVENT of course did nothing to prevent Hassan allegedly setting off a bomb on the London Underground.

It seems that there were at least three chances for Hassan to have been stopped or revealed to be a potential threat by the statutory agencies but he was not and the behaviour of the charity sector doesn’t seem to have been that much better. Whilst Hassan was being interviewed by immigration officials and admitted his connection with ISIS, charities like Barnardo’s whose care he was under should have dropped him like a hot stone, especially as Hassan exhibited some odd behaviour whilst involved with the charity.

The Barnardo’s employee who was present with Hassan at the interview where he made his admission of membership of ISIS was ‘sickened’ by what Hassan had said. However rather than wash their hands of this savage, the Barnardo’s employee appeared to take Hassan’s side and stop the interview on the grounds that Hassan had not understood the question put to him. This seems odd to me. Hassan admitted that he’d been a part of ISIS and does appear to have understood the line of questioning. Hassan had also been caught out by other Barnardo’s employee playing songs that called for the slaughter of Britons and Americans and had previously given the charity conflicting accounts of his background and his family.

There were a number of instances in their contact with Hassan where Barnardo’s employees could and should have seen Hassan as potentially dangerous. This should have meant that Barnardo’s should have either refused to work with him or hand him over to the authorities for questioning, detention or better still deportation. In any event, savages like this one should not be cared for or housed in any sort of childcare setting of the sort that Barnardo’s along with the various ‘refugees welcome’ entities and foster carers that Hassan was involved with had provided.

The Hassan case shows exactly why many of us were and are vehemently opposed to the ‘refugees welcome’ movement. We knew that many of these so-called ‘refugees’, especially those from the culturally retarded Islamic world, would be either a financial or social burden to the country at best and murderous terrorists at worst. Sadly, yet again we may be proven to be correct in our hostility to these fake but often highly dangerous ‘refugees’.

The trial of Hassan continues.