The revelations that are trickling out of Telford regarding that town’s growing Islamic Rape Gang scandal appear to be getting worse and worse. Not only are the local Labour council and West Mercia Police alleged to have ignored up to four decades of Muslims preying on non-Muslim girls for sex but it also seems that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) colluded in stopping a prosecution of one of the rapist Muslims.

According to a report in the Daily Mail dated 1^st April 2018, one of the parents of an alleged victim of these rapist Muslims, a girl aged 13, was told by the Crown Prosecution Service in a letter that the girl had ‘consented’ to sex with the man. Because of this alleged ‘consent’ as claimed by the CPS it became impossible for the CPS to prosecute the sex beast for rape.

The Daily Mail said:

Prosecutors told a Telford grooming victim’s father they couldn’t prosecute the alleged abuser because the 13-year-old had consented to have sex with the man, according to uncovered documents.

The letter was discovered after papers were handed over to the Home Office as part of the ongoing investigation into what may be Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child abuse scandal.

It was sent from the Crown Prosecution Service to a father in 2016, and stated the branch couldn’t prosecute the man because although the young girl may not have wanted to have sex, she agreed she would.

The Mail piece also went into detailed claims made by the defence that the accused had ‘reasonable grounds’ to think that the child was over 16 but I really don’t buy that personally. Most reasonable adult human beings would not become sexually involved with any person where there was the slightest suspicion that their potential sexual partner might be lying about their age or may be close to or below the legal age for sexual relations. However, when it comes to the followers of Islam we are often not dealing with reasonable and responsible people, we are dealing with followers of a racist, supremacist, death cult with little or no cultural or religious prohibition against paedophilia or ephebophilia. I really don’t think that the ‘I thought she was older’ excuse really washes in this case.

I am completely gobsmacked by the claimed actions of the Crown Prosecution Service. These people are lawyers for crying out loud, don’t they know that the law says that only those who are 16 or above have the capacity to consent to sexual intercourse? This sort of behaviour really will look to a lot of people like the CPS has attempted to play down the issue of Islamic Rape Gangs by not prosecuting cases, such as the one mentioned, where Muslims are alleged to have targeted British children for sex. I find the decision of the CPS not to prosecute on grounds of consent utterly baffling and extremely worrying. The law is very clear on the issue of the age of consent, there can be no question of any consent or pseudo-consent being given by the person under 16, because the law says that under 16s are not capable of giving consent to sexual activity. This law should and must apply to all and not be subject to the CPS apparently making things up as they go along, which they certainly seem to have done in this case. All those under the age of 16 are protected by UK law from exploitation by older people and the reason for this law dates back to a child prostitution scandal that was exposed in the 1880’s. Previous to this, the age of consent was twelve and the consent age was raised in order to protect children. If the CPS is throwing this age of consent law under the bus in cases where Muslims are accused of breaching it, as their actions in this case could be seen to be, then it is a remarkable and concerning act of appeasement towards Islam and one that needs to be both condemned and halted.

The existence of this alleged letter from the CPS may indicate that the Telford scandal is not merely a local issue but one which has national implications. If our national criminal prosecutor is behaving in this manner and the letter is not the work of a rogue employee, then it implies that there could be more cases where the CPS has tried to intervene to stop Islamic Rape Gang cases, by falsely claiming that consent had been given by the victim.

I believe that the Crown Prosecution Service urgently needs to clean its house of all the politically correct gunk that they have taken on board during the reign of the soon to be departed current Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), gunk that may have contributed to a culture that saw sending this letter as morally and legally acceptable. At the very least, the new incoming DPP should, as a matter of great urgency, come clean to the public about this letter, and admit publicly any other instances when alleged victims, or their parents, of Islamic Rape Gangs have been sent similar letters, claiming there was consent when in law there can be none.