…..The best, most appropriate, peaceful and lawful answer to that question, is that it is the voters of London are the ones who have this responsibility and indeed a moral duty to do so. London’s voters, the ones that are and will suffer from the mismanagement of the Capital by Sadiq Khan, need to turn out and vote out this appalling and dangerous savage from his position at City Hall.
Sadiq ‘Saracen’ Khan was voted into the office of Mayor of Greater London, partly by a combination of the ‘whipped mosque vote’, idiot Left wingers and migrants hoping that Khan would shower public sector largesse onto them. Unfortunately for normal people, Khan has done all that he can to pander to these groups, the groups that put him into power, and the results have been terrible for ordinary Londoners. Crime has risen sharply, the capital is getting more Islamised and when there is more Islam there is almost inevitably more violence, social problems and degradation, something the people of Redbridge for example have found out since Labour took this borough.
What is galling about the presence of Khan in the mayoral role is this didn’t need to happen. We did not need to have been saddled with ‘Saracen’ Khan or his policies or his arrogance or his well documented associations with some pretty distasteful people. This is because it was not just the voting blocs mentioned above that landed London with Khan, but also the effect of voter apathy. The turnout of voters for Khan’s election was a mere 46% of possible voters. There were also an awful lot of normal Londoners, White, black whatever, who being disengaged from politics, didn’t bother to vote. The 2016 London Mayoral Election that installed the appalling Khan was due in part to the presence of this massive ‘Apathy Party’.
Because ordinary decent Londoner’s didn’t vote against Khan, even if they had to hold their noses and vote for someone not entirely of their choice, we got landed with Khan and all the incompetence and arrogance with which he has mis-governed London. By staying at home and not voting the members of this Apathy Party gave a free run to the whipped mosque votes, the bent Islamic postal votes and the votes of foreigners who thought they could get some freebies by voting Labour. If those who stayed at home had voted and voted for anyone other than Khan, it may have diluted the effect of these bloc votes and the fraudulent votes that seem to be a characteristic of Britain’s Islamic ghettos.
Sadiq ‘Saracen’ Khan has done great damage to London. His policies have pandered to aggressive minority and political factions and the Metropolitan Police, which Khan has responsibility for, seem so to spend far more time and resources on chasing down people who say nasty things about Islam on social media, than they do dealing with real crime.
Despite the threat that Khan’s policies and priorities pose to the lives and property of ordinary decent Londoners, there is no need to go all ‘Becket‘ on Khan. That way as I have said before always leads to madness and horror in the end and is also counterproductive. The best weapon with which to take out Khan is the ballot box. By vowing to turn out and vote, and doing this with the intention of voting for anyone with the best possibility of chasing Khan from office, you have a chance to save London from the fate that will befall it if Khan is re-elected.
It is because millions of Londoners did not turn out to vote that they are being so badly mismanaged by Saracen Khan. If those millions who stayed at home watching television whilst those with ill intent voted Khan into office in 2016 turned out to vote him out in 2020 then we could be finally rid of this turbulent and dangerous Muslim politician, one who has brought misery to so very many decent Londoners.
