Author’s note: This article was written yesterday and some aspects of it are by now, as is the nature of these things, out of date. However, I do believe that the core message of this piece, that we are facing an unprecedented threat from the ideology of Islam and that we should fight smart in the coming weeks and months, still stands and is still valid.
The last few days in the United Kingdom have been what could reasonably be described as the sort of times that the old proverb is said to curse people and nations with, interesting ones. In the space of four days, we have seen Mr Tommy Robinson arrested and imprisoned on Contempt of Court charges in a hearing that has quite obviously raised questions among the minds of many of the public as to its fairness or its probity. We have also seen a far bigger public reaction to this incarceration of Mr Robinson than I would have ever expected to see, and it’s not the reaction that Her Majesty’s current Government would wish to happen. If the government thought that by the courts quietly gaoling Tommy Robinson, the tensions and the anger, most notably the anger over Islamic sex gangs, that have built up over recent years would go away or dissipate, then they were wrong. I’ve been very surprised at the reaction by the public to both the gaoling of Mr Robinson and also the reaction to the gag order.
There have been a series of large demonstrations in London and smaller demonstrations elsewhere in the UK calling for Mr Robinson to be released from prison. These demonstrations are also targeted not just at the issue of Mr Robinson’s incarceration, but also at the reporting restrictions on both Mr Robinson’s case and the primary case which he was reporting on. The reporting restrictions on the primary case and even on Mr Robinson’s aspect of it may have been imposed for sound legal reasons, such as protecting the fairness of forthcoming linked trials that are linked to this one. However, because of the nature of the primary case, one of alleged Islamic sex crime, these reporting restrictions are being seen by a number of people who I’ve read and heard from, as a symbol of the indifference that the politicians, the civil service, the police and the judiciary have towards ordinary people.
For decades, normal people, doing normal jobs and bringing up normal families, have had their lives turned upside down by the predatory sex criminals that have emerged from Britain’s Islamic communities. Daughters, sisters, mothers and others, have been brutally physically and mentally violated by men from an Islamic culture that is completely at odds with our own and which too often produces individuals who see us and especially our women and children, as property and prey. The anger of those violated and their families was compounded by the indifference of the police with whom they dealt and the sight of police officers glad handing and consorting in a friendly manner with representatives of the communities that had spawned their tormentors. This is the well spring of the anger that has burst out over the gaoling of Mr Tommy Robinson. This anger is not just about Mr Robinson. This anger is about the ruined lives and broken communities, that have resulted from the State appeasing ideologies that are incompatible with those of these Islands, and then forbidding us, by ignoring people’s complaints or by using threat and punishment, from speaking about either our problems or the perceived causes of these problems.
I’ve been around the political scene on both the Left and on the Centre Right since the early 1980’s. I’ve lived through numerous political and social crisis periods and I don’t think I’ve seen as much anger and disgust and tension in the air since the days of the Poll Tax revolt and the Miners Strike. In fact there seems to be more tension now than there ever was then, mostly because both the Miners Strike and to a lesser extent the Poll Tax revolt were more geographically concentrated in either major cities or the coal mining areas. The problems with Islam that are afflicting Britain and Britons today are not geographically isolated, they are affecting nearly every area of the country. Wherever it appears there is organised Islam, there are rapes, child abuse, aggressive behaviour from Muslims, political corruption (Muslim vote chasing) and the ever present and theologically sanctioned Islamic problem of jihad. Who would have thought for example that Exeter, or Bristol or Torquay would be places that in just a few decades have become associated respectively with Islamic extremist terror, Islamic Rape Gangs or followers of Islam who sexually assault teenage passengers in their taxi.
People are angry about the country’s Islam problems and they have a right to be angry because this anger is morally justified. This anger is not caused by Mr Robinson, he only reports on the problems that are leading to this increased anger. The reality of the situation is that the anger has been caused by the damaging policies, especially the social policies and migration policies of successive governments who, although the party names and faces may change, still serve up the same political gruel to the subject as the politicians they replaced.
The gaoling of Mr Robinson has merely lit the blue touchpaper of a very large firework, one that has been constructed over decades, that the government may have hoped could be prevented from being ignited. This metaphorical firework has been built up from the seething anger that has arisen because of the damage that the pro-Islam and pro-migration policies of the political Establishment has done to people’s lives and environments.
I see the anger, an anger that has been held down for far too long, starting to ooze and erupt. Not only have there been major demonstrations in Britain and overseas which have primarily focused on Mr Robinson’s plight, but are also about Britain’s by now undeniable Islam related problems, there has also been a mass defiance of the court reporting restriction the like of which I don’t think I’ve ever seen before. There has been a sort of ‘I’m Spartacus’ tide running across social media and elsewhere of people sharing the court document that initiated the reporting restriction, even though it is forbidden to do so. This level of defiance and the amount of those taking part in it is in my experience unprecedented. In the past people may have worried about breaking the law by sharing such data, but now they are so angry at the ban and what it symbolises, that they are distributing the information nevertheless.
As I said we have a right to be angry. We have a right to fight back against the injustices that have been done against ourselves and our communities. But if we are to fight to regain the freedoms that have been stolen from us and deal honestly and firmly with the problems that we all face then we have to fight smart.
Fighting smart for me at least looks a little like what is being done at the moment which is the combination of protest and legal and political challenges. Fighting smart is waking up your fellow man or woman to the extent and nature of the problems we face by any distributive means necessary. Fighting smart also looks like civil disobedience of which actions like the distribution of the restricted court document could possibly be described as. I see a lot more of what has happened over the last few days as being like the breaching of a dam, a dam of state imposed silence about some pretty vital questions about existential threats, that has been risen to a level that the dam cannot stand. It is possible, as Tommy Robinson said during his appearance on the stage at the Day For Freedom rally in London on May 6th, that things are ‘going to turn and turn quickly’.
How they turn and in which direction is difficult to predict, hence the idea of ‘fighting smart’. Stupidity and stupid actions will without a doubt be exploited by the State for propaganda purposes. I believe that there are those in government who may well know the full extent of Britain’s Islam problems and need an excuse to clamp down even further on the rights of Britons. I wouldn’t bet against there being those in some government departments and various Islamic and left wing groups who are just itching to see righteously angry Britons doing stupid stuff such as physically attacking random Muslims or burning down mosques. These actions would be mercilessly exploited by the authoritarians of the Left and of Islam as well as the State. The State has also had a long time to prepare for the sort of civil disorder that the anger at negative impact of the ideology of Islam on our society could have been predicted to bring. It is entirely possible that various government departments, especially the Home Office and the Ministry of Defence have war-gamed various scenarios about what would happen if there was a breakdown of order over the issue of Islam.
It is because the State has probably rehearsed what might happen in the event of disorder as a response to Islam, which they must have done following the fall out from the 2011 riots, then it is imperative that we must fight smarter than ‘King Mob’ would do. Kicking out at some random Muslim or similar foolishness is not what is needed right now, it will make things much, much worse and is also unjust. Concentrate ire instead on those who have brought about this disaster, the inhabitants of the Westminster Village, those who rarely live with the problems that their policies have caused to the rest of us and which have made us, as Sargon of Akkad said:’Not a free country’. The elected, often on very small turnouts, members of the House of Commons are the ones who should be forced to confront the realities of what their policies have done. However this can be most effectively done by threatening that which many politicians desire, which is power and this we can threaten, at least at the moment, via the ballot box.
Having thought about what has happened over the last month and especially over the last few days, I think we are in for some of those interesting times that get warned about. It is possible, if the State gets the collywobbles over the size and the intensity of the protests over the gaoling of Mr Robinson, that they will try to solve the problems that these protests pose the state via tyrannical means. Previously, dissidents in Britain could be silenced or excluded or publicly mocked by smearing them as ‘racists’ or ‘far right’ or ‘Islamophobic’. This tactic no longer works as well as it did, because it has lost much of its power through over and inappropriate use. Without handy and effective ‘snarl’ words to use to silence or exclude dissidents, the next step for the state is likely to take the form of intimidation, more than likely intimidatory arrests, of the sort we saw used in the case of Amy the Bacon Lady.
Although at the time or writing the reporting restrictions on Mr Robinson’s case have just been lifted, this does not mean that Mr Robinson is in any way safe. He is still being held in prison, he is still at risk of assault or worse from one of the thousands of followers of the ‘religion of piss’ that are currently incarcerated in our gaols. The protests over the draconian sentence imposed on Mr Robinson must continue, because his fight is also the fight of everyone else who believes in liberty, justice and freedom from the creeping Islamic theological fascism that is taking roots in this country. I get the distinct impression that the government may have been caught out by the extent of the anger at the gagging order and this may be in part the reason why the judge removed it, although it was done ostensibly at the behest of media organisations. I dare say that there may be some in government who may hope that with the lifting of the reporting restriction the metaphorical firework that this incident has lit will go out, we must make sure that this does not happen. We need to see Tommy free and for there to be freedom for all, including the freedom to discuss those matters which are on the list of those that the government would rather us not talk about, which at the moment is headed by the word ‘Islam’. Think smart, be smart and don’t be silenced remember a combination of foolish behaviour and silence is what some may want.
