I can readily understand why the United Kingdom Independence Party when led by Nigel Farage, left the issue of Islam alone and concentrated instead on pressing for and winning the Referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union. Mr Farage knew that the press was biased against anyone who spoke up against Islam and against the multicultural fallacy. He could see that commenting on these matters, even though they were matters of great concern for ordinary Britons, would detract from the bigger and more immediate goal, which was freeing Britain from the European Union. This is because without being free of the German-dominated EU, we could not even begin to tackle many of the problems, including Islam, that the Leftists of various shades, have caused in Britain or imported to our shores.
But things are changing. The Referendum on Britain’s membership has been won and patriotism is now moving centre stage. After a few bad leaders, UKIP now has a half decent leader in the form of Gerard Batten who is more willing than the likes of Henry Bolton was, to speak up about the damage that orthodox Islam is doing to Britain and its people. UKIP now also has people like Lord Malcolm Pearson of Rannoch who are prepared to stand up in the House of Lords and tell the truth about Islam. What is impressive about Lord Pearson’s truth telling is that he is doing it even if he has to suffer the political slings and arrows hurled at him by the likes of Muslim peers such as Baroness Warsi of Dewsbury and the non Muslim peers who act like Quislings for Islam, such as Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth.
In a recent conversation with Breitbart London, Lord Pearson decried the way he was treated by other peers such as the ones named above when he brought up the subject of the need for Islamic organisations to be monitored for extremism.
Breitbart said:
On Wednesday Lord Pearson asked a question in the House of Lords about monitoring “hate speech against non-Muslims” in Islamic schools and mosques.
He was shouted down, mocked, and accused of “hate speech”. Speaking after the debate, he told Breitbart London that he and many other Britons were “fed up” with the mockery and labels of “Islamophobia”.
This mockery is typical of what comes from the pro-Islam Establishment whenever anyone makes the slightest criticism of Islam or publicly recognises that Islam is different, and not different in a nice way. Lord Pearson is 100% correct when he says that many Britons are getting fed up with being mocked and smeared as ‘Islamophobes’ merely for pointing out that Islam has brought a shed load of problems for the people of this country. This arrogant dismissal by the Establishment of the genuine concerns of British subjects about the problems brought by Islam is I believe just storing up greater problems for the future.
I also agree with Lord Pearson that those who belong to groups that are concerned with Islamisation and the jihad of rape and violence that has been brought to these islands by Islam should be considering joining UKIP. Street demonstrations and engaging in non violent direct action are of course a good way of people expressing their displeasure at both Islam and Islam’s Quislings, but it is by political power that these problems will be sorted out.
Breitbart added:
The Peer suggested the “tens of thousands” of supporters of groups like Veterans Against Terrorism and the Football Lads Alliance join UKIP and help influence the direction of the party.
He argued street protest would have little impact on out-of-touch establishment politicians, and that “if you want to do anything about the Islamification of your communities, the only thing you can do is join UKIP”.
The Lord Pearson is correct here. The political classes live in such a closed off bubble that they cannot see that their policies are dangerous and are fomenting troubles for the future. The political classes are so woefully out of touch that they do not comprehend what is going on in the communities that have been stressed and in some cases decimated by Islam. The only way to properly and legitimately rid ourselves of these Quislings and the ideology that they pander to is to vote the bastards out of office, something that we have a window of opportunity to do before demographics give us an Islamic destiny. I do disagree with Lord Pearson’s distancing of himself from the Free Tommy movement but I can understand where he is coming from. Maybe the noble Lord is more use to the cause of freedom from Islam by hammering away at the Quislings in the Upper House and exposing the pro-Islam fools for the danger that they are, than he would be speaking on a Free Tommy platform?
UKIP has undergone a massive sea change since the ascendancy of Gerard Batten as leader. It is no longer the party that ignored the issue of Islam as it was under Mr Farage and it is not longer pandering for Muslim votes as it disgracefully did under Paul Nuttall. Under Mr Batten, UKIP is now more willing to speak about an ideology that the people can recognise as a threat to our culture and our survival. We should support those like Lord Pearson and Mr Batten who are prepared to step up to the plate and call a spade a spade, or in this case call Islam what it really is, which is an unwelcome and dangerous death cult.
