As is becoming depressingly familiar in these cases, the more detail that is released after a terrorist atrocity about the alleged perpetrators, then the more data comes out that describes the utter failure of government agencies to protect us from Islamic savagery. The case of the most recent vehicular attack on the Westminster area is no exception. I am becoming increasingly familiar, but no less angry, at repeated stories of Islamic terrorists or Muslims who chose terrorism who it is later revealed were known by the police to be radical or were becoming radical and were not turned in to by Muslim communities. I am also wearily aware of major government departments, especially the Home Office who seem to do little to prevent those from dangerous cultures and dangerous countries and dangerous ideologies from entering or establishing their activities in the UK.

In the case of the latest Muslim savage to attack the Palace of Westminster the position of the Home Office in particular should in particular be examined and criticised. The latest Westminster attacker was one of those from incompatible cultures or nations let into the UK by a Home Office that gives the distinct impression that they’ve decided to just prop the nation’s doors open and let everyone in.

The man who is alleged to have carried out this attack, Salih Khater is an asylum seeker from Sudan’s war torn Darfur region. He has apparently been here, or at least away from Sudan for eight years and sometime between his arrival and the attack he was granted British citizenship by the Home Office. Khater was someone who arrived from a backwards Muslim country like Sudan, was likely to make little real economic or social contribution to the nation and was not claiming asylum in the first safe country. It is people like this whom the Home Office should be turning away as the are a threat to security, social cohesiveness and often an economic burden. Unfortunately common sense did not prevail and Khater was granted British citizenship by the Home Office. The result of the Home Office’s decision is that Westminster has narrowly avoided yet another set of Muslim related murders, but only by luck, not by judgement. If the Home Office had put the rest of us first and not prioritised the entry of this savage over that security, then this attack may not have happened.

The aftermath of his incident has also seen the familiar vociferous denials of terrorism coming from the alleged attacker’s family and friends. The Daily Mail for example is carrying the comments of Khater’s family members and those who knew him. The are denying point blank that there is any terror connection with Khater and that it was all a terrible accident, not a terror attack. They may well be correct and this was an accident, but the positive comments about Khater seem to me at least to be a little too practised. They remind me somewhat of the suspiciously polished statement about ‘mental illness’ that were put out by the family of the Muslim murderer who shot two people to death in a Toronto restaurant earlier this year.

The Daily Mail said:

A friend of the Westminster terror suspect described him as a ‘kind, quiet’ and ‘decent’ person who is ‘always smiling’ -and that the car crash outside the Houses of Parliament was an ‘definitely an accident’.

Speaking to ITV News this evening, Anwar Khater said he was sure Salih Khater did not mean to injure people yesterday when his car rammed through pedestrians and cyclists during the morning rush-hour.

He said: ‘You can take three words to describe any good person, he is. He is very generous, very smiley… even in any event that happens. He is always participating in a good way.

‘All the media and all the stuff now, they are all coming into a lie. Because the accident, it is an accident. It is nothing to do with terrorists, it is nothing to do with any kind of organisation that tries to attack any government department or something like that.’ 

Are you inclined to believe this explanation? I’m not. This could be taqiyya or lying to protect Islam on the part of Khater’s friends and family but it could also be that they were hoodwinked just as the Home Office was. The most effective of Islamic terrorists are those who can mask their extremism behind a veil of moderation or at the very least not do stuff that will draw attention to themselves. The boastful extremist will increase his or her chances of coming to the attention of the police and the Security Service if civic minded Muslims become aware of the person’s extremism and inform the authorities. The denials of Khatar’s involvement in terrorism by those who knew him may be down to Khatar hiding this aspect of his views from them? This could be another example of the ‘sudden jihad syndrome’ that has afflicted Europe for a number of years now with ostensibly Westernised Muslims suddenly deciding that Jihad is the way to go.

Something really smells bad about this incident and about Khatar himself. There are several questions that need to be asked here. Firstly there is the question about how much the police and the Security Service may have known about this savage before he carried out the attack? Secondly we need to ask about how much digging into his background and attitudes did the Home Office do before they granted him British citizenship? It may well be that the police could have been aware of Khater being a bit dodgy but may have decided that there were more important and more immediately lethal Islamic fish to fry. If that is the case then we have a greater problem with Islamic terrorism and extremism than the authorities are letting on. The Home Office should re-examine the process by which Khatar obtained British citizenship as he doesn’t strike me as the sort of person who a Western nation should be jumping to let in, such as a high net worth migrant who is going to invest in the UK or someone with a rare skill.

Yet again we have a case where the Home Office has failed to protect the rest of us by being lax as to who should and who should not become a British citizen. The Home Office may well have cocked up here very badly and it makes me wonder how many other potentially dangerous Muslims from the savage cultures created by Islam the Home Office has allowed to become British?

Although there is much that is currently obscured in this case at this stage, I believe that more will emerge once Khatar appears for trial at the Crown Court. We may find out what ludicrous tales he may have spun in order to get UK citizenship, and information may emerge about who helped him obtain said citizenship and much more detail about Khatar’s associates. What is indisputable however is that if Khatar was not here then this attack would not have happened. We should be rightly angry that a potentially dangerous savage who could have killed people in his attack, was allowed in to the UK and given all the rights and benefits that are conferred by a British passport.