Islam is, as I’ve said on numerous occasions before, a bit different from other faiths. Islam, unlike the vast majority of world religions both polytheistic and monotheistic, seems to have a habit of producing what can reasonably and bluntly be called wrong’uns. You just have to look at the statistics of which religions are producing the most rapists, violent thugs, terrorists and practitioners of sedition to see the truth that Islam is different, and not in a good way.

If you look around Britain today, you will observe if you are open minded enough, that the nation is not being plagued by massive problems regarding gangs of Hindu rapists, anti-social Buddhists, drug dealing Sikhs or Jews plotting terrorism. Although all these groups can have their individual bad people these are individual aberrations from their respective cultures and moral codes. Bad Hindus or Sikhs have been, in my experience, created in spite of the religion and culture of their upbringing and not because of it. This leads us to see the huge difference between Islam and other faith groups. Islam’s theology is, because of its violent and uncompromising and indeed fascistic nature, one almost guaranteed to produce individuals who hate others, wish to do violence to others and to kill and oppress others. These ‘others’ can be members of other faiths or cultures, heterodox Muslims such as reformers and in particular the portion of the Muslim community that is female. Islam is a cult of death and a good example of the sort of people that this cult produces, and which are not being properly dealt with by the authorities, can be found in a recent article from the Manchester Evening News about an Islamic extremist called Atiq Ahmed, from Oldham, who was gaoled for four years (not long enough in my opinion) for having information useful for terrorism and who has convictions for similar offences and a conviction for religious harassment.

This particular Muslim is, as you will see, a person of little or no use to the nation or our society. He openly hates us all, has a lengthening record for jihadi views and proselytising for jihad, thinks nothing of acquiring ISIS instruction manuals and has attempted to promote his twisted hate filled and yes, let’s not shy away from this fact, Islamic views, at a primary school. This man should not be here, even if he was a British citizen by birth as he hates his fellow British subjects and his nation so much that he is prepared to promote ISIS. Whilst his thoughts, no matter how extreme, should not and cannot not be sanctioned or policed, his actions in promoting jihad and by acquiring documents likely to be useful for terrorism, should be. This man went far beyond being a loudmouth and went about deliberately acquiring online instructions from ISIS on how to carry out terror attacks. This man is a danger to us and a drain on our resources, why, we need to ask is this savage not being exiled from the UK? He obviously wants our country destroyed so why are we or rather our government, keeping this incredibly dangerous Islamic ‘pet’ in Britain? This case is one of the best examples yet as to why Western nations should look again and maybe depart from the various international agreements that prohibit the creation of stateless persons or place burdens on signatories to accept or support such individuals. Without such legal instruments then a more suitable punishment could be inflicted on this savage, the punishment of exile.

Here’s part of the Manchester Evening News article with my commentary on pertinent sections. As is usual policy for this blog the original text from MEN is in italics whereas my comments are in plain text.

The Manchester Evening News said:

An extremist was arrested at a primary school after telling a teacher they were an ‘infidel’ and would ‘burn in hell.’

Officers later found Atiq Ahmed, from Oldham, had issues of an Islamic State propaganda magazine on a tablet computer.

Staff saw Ahmed, 35, was seen talking to children near the entrance of the school.

At first they thought he was a parent, but Ahmed became aggressive when questioned by a teacher.

He then shouted at the teacher, saying: “You are an infidel. You are going to burn in hell. You are a kafir (a derogatory term referring to non-Muslims).”

Doesn’t this Ahmed character strike you as it does me as being the sort of scumbag who should be either exiled or judicially interned? Ahmed brings nothing to the national collective table and is an avowed hater of Britain and its people. He is an incorrigible Islamic savage and like other similar Islamic savages, is the type of person that Britain neither needs nor wants. He hates us, why then is he here? Do we really need or have any use for some seventh century savage who tries to promote his spiritual mental illness outside a primary school? Personally I do not think we do.

The Manchester Evening News stated that Ahmed had denied being a terrorist although he pleaded guilty to terrorism related offences. Mr Jonathan Polnay the Crown counsel stated that the information that Ahmed possessed was a ‘practical guide to committing terrorist acts’. The MEN article then went on to say that doctors who had examined Ahmed and had said that he was sane, but in possession of a warped world view. The doctors added that they believed that Ahmed was a low risk for ‘harming others’. Hmm! I’m not sure that I would want to be the judge who relied on such advice. This savage is certainly bad enough to sent to gaol so he’s probably bad enough to kill or maim or assist other Muslims to kill or maim. His own defence counsel, Mr Anthony Barraclough, admitted that Ahmed was extreme during mitigation when he said:

“He is not, in the medical sense, a nutter. He is an extreme thinker.

I thought that was a great comment from Mr Barraclough as there really is nothing you can say in mitigation about so revolting a specimen of Islamist hatred as Ahmed appears to be. I reckon to put it another way, Ahmed’s medically sane but extremely Muslim, or maybe Ahmed is suffering from a mental illness but one called Islam? Either way he is an unwanted scumbag. I know plenty of Christians and Jews who are very serious about their respective faiths probably to a similar level of intensity to that possessed by Ahmed, but they don’t go round stockpiling terrorist information, building apparent links with ISIS or hustling for religious violence. It is, as we have seen so often nearly always the followers of Islam who do this.

What galls me about this case is it is not the first time that this savage has been had up before the courts on terror related charges. So far, according to the Manchester Evening News, over the last few years Ahmed has been sentenced to two years and six months in prison for disseminating terrorist publications, after his YouTube account was found to have links to two videos glorifying Islamic State.

After he was released from prison Ahmed was involved in the incident at the primary school for which he received a 12 month prison sentence suspended for two years for religious harassment activities at the school. Ahmed’s latest terror sentence was for four years and six months after pleading guilty to five counts of possessing a document or record which contains information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.

Time and time again this savage has been either suspected of, convicted or admitted terrorist sympathies and has been caught with material that shows that he has sided with murderous terrorists yet still he remains among us. It cannot be morally or ethically correct to give so much leniency to someone who not only plainly hates all the rest of us and our nation, but who is acquiring information that could be useful to those other Muslims who wish to kill or harm us or our families even if, as the doctors say, Ahmed is unlikely to commit murder himself. I fear that this savage called Ahmed will bring no good to the future Britain he will be released into, he is unlikely to be redeemed from the grip of his violent hatreds in prison because these hatreds are embedded in the Islam he follows. This savage is one for whom we have no use or need, this savage deserves exile, this savage should go.