Islamic groups will seemingly stop at nothing to silence criticism of Islam. If they are not murdering critics of Islam in terror attacks, then they are making use of Western political and administrative systems as a tool to legally silence critics of Islam.

One very obvious attempt by Islamic groups to shut down criticism of Islam is to try to get Islam classified as a ‘race’. By doing this Islamic groups thereby gain the ideology of Islam much more protection than it and its followers truly deserve, under a legal system and a culture that sees racialism and discrimination based on race as abhorrent.

There is currently a massive and well organised attempt by Islamic groups to force the Government of the United Kingdom to accept a very vague definition of Islamophobia. This new definition would treat as an aggravating circumstance the expression of hostility to a person’s ‘Muslimness’ or ‘perceived Muslimness’. In effect these Muslim groups are asking for anything that could be even remotely perceived or termed as ‘Islamophobia’ be criminalised. This attempt at forcing this ‘Islamophobia’ definition on the UK government could, if successful, be exploited by a phalanx of Islamic grievance mongers and dodgy individuals in order to shut down all criticism of Islam.

These Muslim groups have been assisted in their quest for criticism of or hostility towards their death cult to be outlawed, by Islamopandering Members of Parliament who, with one eye on the Muslims who keep them in their seats. I speak here particularly of MP’s such as Wes Streeting of Ilford North who has been disgracefully gushing about Islam in his communications about this new definition of ‘Islamophobia’.

One account of this attempt to further infiltrate the shaky ideology of ‘Islamophobia’ into our legal and governmental system can be found in the Guardian newspaper. The gave a relatively large amount of space in their article to those promoting this new definition of ‘Islamophobia’ as a form of ‘racism’ or the alleged incidents that some Muslims claim have happened to them because they are Muslim, yet gave zero space to anybody to challenge the shonky claim that ‘Islamophobia equals racism’ idea. Islam is an ideology not a race. If you can easily convert to it by merely saying the few lines of the Shahada, then it is an ideology rather than a distinctive racial group.

Here’s part of the Guardian article.

Muslim organisations are urging Theresa May, Jeremy Corbyn and all other party leaders to adopt a newly proposed working definition of Islamophobia in an attempt to put pressure on a reluctant Home Office to follow suit.

The Muslim Council of Britain and other Islamic groups want the Conservatives and Labour to take the lead in the aftermath of a week marked by public outrage over the alleged racist bullying of a 15-year-old Syrian refugee in Huddersfield.

The definition was set out in a report published by a cross-party group of MPs last week and says: “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”

Harun Khan, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said his and other groups hoped political leaders would “all understand the importance of listening to communities” and make a “positive response” by adopting the definition.

It’s pretty obvious that these Muslim groups are after gaining further advantages for Islam and Muslims in UK law and in UK government and administration. The heavy political pressure that these groups, and their non Muslim Quislings, are putting on the government looks like strong arm tactics to me.

However there was a small amount of good news in the Guardian article and that is the response of the Home Office to this attempt to class a dislike of Islam and Muslims as the same as disliking people for the immutable things about them such as skin colour. The Home Office has refused to accept the definition cooked up by the Muslim groups and the All Party Parliamentary Group on ‘Islamophobia’. The Guardian reported the Home Office as saying:

However, a Home Office minister said earlier that the department had no intention of adopting a definition, in response to a question from one of the chairs of the cross-party group, the Conservative MP Anna Soubry. Victoria Atkins told the Commons in March that there were “many definitions of Islamophobia”, but added: “We do not accept the need for a definitive definition, but we know that Islamophobia is clearly recognised and that we have very effective monitoring systems of all race-hate crimes.”

It may well be the case that the Home Office may know full well that treating Islam like a race would be something that would inevitably be exploited by grievance mongers and Islamic political interests. This may be partially why this call is being resisted, at present, by the Home Office and may explain the ‘get your tanks off of my lawn’ tone that the Home Office minister has used. By saying that the Home Office already has sufficient Islamopandering legislation and systems at their command, they are telling these Muslim groups and their pet politicians that these extra rights for Muslims are plainly not needed. Let us hope that the Home Office can resist the sort of pressure, including political pressure from the likes of Corbyn etc, that they are being put under by these Islamic groups and their helpers. The very last people on earth that Britons should be allowing to influence any area of government policy is the Muslim Council of Britain. This is because what this group wants is too often at odds with what the rest of the population want and because the MCB is a thoroughly disgraceful organisation that presents a fake fair face to the world but is in reality just another Islamic supremacist entity.

Muslims have enough legal protections already, they do not need any more. Any further advantaging of Muslims in the legal sphere, as this new definition of ‘Islamophobia’ does, will further entrench the perception that the British legal system is a two tier one with Muslims getting one thing and the rest of us getting something else entirely. I predict that if the Government caves in and adopts this definition and people start to realise the possible implications of it for policing etc, then a reaction against it will grow. However we should not wait to see if the Islamic groups manage to bully Corbyn etc into supporting this new definition, the politicians who have already supported this idea should be peacefully protested now. This definition needs to be rejected as do all ‘hate speech’ and ‘hate crime’ laws should be. This is because they treat people to different standards in the same criminal law system and that is an offence against the idea that all should be equal before the criminal law.