The story of the ‘Syrian refugee’, who was allegedly attacked without reason in a Huddersfield school, caused the media, some in the political classes and various Islamic grievance mongers like the Tell Mama group for example to completely lose their collective shit. The narrative that the Syrian boy in question, named as Jamal, was attacked because his family were ‘refugees’ became a magnet for virtue signallers ensconced in the education and sporting fields and among those in the middle class ‘MetroLeft’. Well over £100,000 was donated by various useful idiots to a GoFundMe page set up by supporters of Jamal and both he and his family have done remarkably well financially out of a story that was reported by the mainstream media in a very noticeably one sided way.
However, there is another, alternative, narrative regarding the playground conflict in Almondbury school in Huddersfield that is starting to emerge. This narrative has come out over the last week or so in fits and starts and with sometimes containing less than perfect or accurate information. On one occasion the challenge to the mainstream media’s version of the story was hampered by spoof information given to Tommy Robinson, one of the main promoters of the alternative version of this story. But this story is not, I imagine to the chagrin of the Left and Islamic groups, looking like it is going to go away.
Tommy Robinson has it seems shrugged off the fact checking error that he made when the story broke, when solid information from the ‘ground zero’ of the story was probably thin on the ground. He’s now done what he, or one of his agents or a reporter, should have done initially, which is speak to Bailey, the English boy who had the confrontation with Jamal. Mr Robinson has also spoken face to face with one of Bailey’s parents and has firmed up his knowledge of what is apparently happening at the school.
What is emerging is a very different story from what we were told by the mainstream media and the virtue signallers from various fields. There is, as I expected it to be, much more to this story than we have been told by the likes of the BBC, Sky and some politicians. Those interviewed by Mr Robinson made allegations that Jamal was much more of a victimiser than victim and claimed that Jamal was in reality the bully rather than the bullied. The individuals in the video interviews put out by Mr Robinson also appear to confirm that the conflict between Jamal and Bailey was not the only one that Jamal was involved in. The claim is that Jamal may have been involved in other bullying incidents, including a threat to stab Bailey. Some confirmation of this can be seen in the original video of the incident between Bailey and Jamal where Bailey confronts Jamal with the words ‘So what have you been saying now?’ This certainly implies that Jamal was allegedly involved in slagging people or their loved ones off and even engaging in verbal bullying.
There is a shedload of injustice connected to this story. Jamal, who apparently garnered the reputation among other school pupils as being a little thug, is dishonestly being painted as a pure and unadulterated victim, something that is rapidly being revealed to not be the case. He’s walked away from this wealthy and with a whole host of opportunities about to be put before him by those who want to show their virtue by helping him out. This situation is, if those who are now speaking up against him are correct, profoundly unjust. It is especially unjust when compared to how Bailey, who it should be remembered engaged in retaliatory violence not violence that he seems to have instigated, and his family have been treated. They have had to go into hiding following threats of violence from Muslims and Leftists. Their lives have, without just cause, been turned upside down and have had to hide from a ravening violent mob whipped up by media, some politicians and Left/Islamic activists.
We have before us, if the counter narrative to the mainstream one can be believed, a situation where a young boy who engaged in some relatively minor playground argy bargy towards an alleged bully is treated as a villain by adults who should know better. These adults, in newsrooms, Parliament and the offices of sometimes lavishly publicly funded Islamic and Leftist grievance-monger groups, turned their ire and vitriol onto a 16 year old boy without good cause and without waiting to find out the full facts.
As Mr Robinson points out, there have been other allegations of similar sorts of bullying that is claimed to have occurred at other schools and at other locations. At least one of those incidents where a Muslim girl was shown to be the bully has been filmed and publicly distributed. But as expected, there has been no favourable fuss made in this instance of a White British girl having water poured over her by a girl in a Hijab in a similar type of incident to that of Huddersfield. When I saw the clip of that incident I could not ascertain whether or not this attack happened due to racial or religious motivation, but the attacker’s Muslim friends certainly seemed to be approving of the actions, which could be taken as being the case.
The emergence of a counter to the mainstream narrative to the Almondbury School case not only fills in many of the gaps in the story that the news media and others put out, but also plainly illustrates how dishonestly this story has been covered. This dishonesty over the story of Jamal and Bailey has been noticed by a great many people. There were always two sides to this story as there are to many other stories and the media ignored one half of the story of this incident because it ticked the right political boxes. It had as its central figure a boy whom they could portray as a ‘vulnerable refugee’ and allowed them to scream ‘racist, racist’ at a child in a modern day digital version of Orwell’s ‘two minutes hate’. Journalists and politicians in particular seem to fear not joining in with the chorus of ‘racist, racist’ at whatever or whoever is today’s hate figure pushed by the Left and their Islamic allies, lest the mob turn on them instead. There has been a great deal of knee jerk reading from the NPC hymnsheet by those involved in this case and commenting on it. The local MP for Huddersfield Barry Sheerman should have known better than to climb onto the ‘racism’ and ‘vulnerable refugee’ bandwagons without hearing both sides of the story. I suspect that there may be many more local people in Huddersfield asking the question of Mr Sheerman, ‘whose side are you on, everyone’s or just certain people from certain groups?’
I suspect that despite the way that the mainstream media has handled this story, the counter narrative to it will not go away. In fact I think that this story will grow into something much bigger and here’s how I think this might happen.
The publicity about the injustice that Bailey and his family have suffered because of the fallout from this incident is garnering a great deal of attention on social media and in those organs that claim to be an alternative to the mainstream media. This attention may well encourage other parents who have had children suffer from Muslim violence, which may have been brushed under the carpet by schools, to speak out. Now not all of the claims that will be made will be true or easy to prove, not even to the civil standard of a balance of probabilities, but there could be enough that are true to ignite widespread anger about what is going on in our schools.
If schools and local authorities have been playing down Muslim gangs in our schools and confirmation for this policy is presented, then this could become a critical mass issue. More parents coming forward and reporting problems would in turn lead to others being emboldened to report their issue with school based Islamic violence. Any indication that schools and local authorities have hidden an Islamic violence problem in educational establishments could cause much greater and more visible public protest about this issue.
I really don’t think that this story, and the wider issue of the behaviour of Muslim children in our schools, has either gone away or been drowned by the virtue signallers. I think that this story is only just getting started.
Link
Original video from Tommy Robinson containing the interview with those telling another side to the Huddersfield incidents
