A week or so ago I commented on the story of Mohammed Hassan Al Bayati who was convicted by a Jury in Australia of a heinous sex attack on a very young girl. This particular Islamic savage worked as a security guard in a shopping centre and snatched the girl from a play area in the centre where he worked. He led the child off down service corridors to an area where there was no CCTV and sexually abused the girl.

This was a terrible and unconscionable offence that as I said in my previous piece could only be carried out by a thoroughly conscienceless individual. I had hoped that this savage would have been given an exemplary sentence as there are a number of aggravating factors in this case. Unfortunately as Avi Yemini reports, this savage was gaoled for only two and a half years. The judge apparently took account of this savage’s ‘troubled background’, which includes a dubious ‘refugee’ story and illegal entry to Australia.

The first aggravating factor is that Al Bayati was employed as a security guard and was therefore in a position of authority, something that may have been a factor in the girl initially going along with this savage. The second factor is that he did not plead guilty and therefore forced a trial with all the implications that brings. Thirdly, this was not a spur of the moment offence in any way shape or form. There appears to be deliberate planning on the part of this offender to snatch and attack a child. This is not a case where someone was not of right mind or didn’t know right from wrong. This savage decided freely to act on his perverted lust for children. The fourth factor is the disgusting ingratitude that this savage has shown the Australian people. This savage had, because of his illegal entry to Australia and his dubious back story, no real right to enter and live in Australia. Sadly the liberal Left Establishment, which is every bit as nasty in Australia as it is in other parts of the West, let this bastard into the country, supported him and let him find a job. However it whilst in this job as a security guard, a position of trust, that he suddenly decided to commit this offence against a very young girl.

All of these aggravating factors along with the severity of the case, should have outweighed any claim of ‘previous trauma’ by the defence. Two and a half years is just not nearly enough of a punishment for this savage. This judge should have been looking at minimum of a sentence of eight to ten years plus the removal of his right to live in Australia. Because of this ludicrously lenient sentence it is likely that this savage will be out in a relatively short amount of time bearing in mind the nature of the crime. When released, if not deported as the prosecution wants, he may end up being a further risk to children and because his offence has made him all but unemployable in any area that he may be qualified for, he will be a continuing burden on Australia’s taxpayers.

This savage should never have been allowed into Australia, never helped to get a job as a security guard and finally should never have been given such a short sentence for such a serious offence. This savage is the perfect example of the sort of ‘refugee’ that sensible people have been warning would come from the Islamic world and a good reason why we should keep Muslim ‘refugees’ out of the West.