Most people who take the time to be informed about what is going on in the world understand that Britain is currently suffering from an epidemic of sex crime carried out by Muslims. However, if you have the misfortune to get your news from the likes of the BBC or Sky News, this problem is something that you may not be aware of.
Not a day seems to go by without some Islamic sex beast being accused or convicted of some horrific sexual offence, often offences involving girls who are under the age of consent. The latest one that has come to my attention is a case that shows just how bold these Islamic nonces have become and also shows up some failings by Greater Manchester Police.
The Metro newspaper is reporting how Abdul Khalid aged 27 was given an extra 32 months imprisonment on top of a 3 year gaol term imposed in 2017 for inciting a child into sexual activity after police belatedly discovered messages from Khalid to other girls pestering them for sex. According to the Metro, Khalid’s mobile phone was not checked by police until after the three year sentence had been passed. Khalid was then brought before Manchester’s Minshul Street Crown Court where he pleaded guilty to four additional counts of inciting a child into sexual activity.
The Khalid case shows just how recidivist and indeed bold these Islamic sex beasts are becoming. He consistently targeted girls below the age of consent in order to attempt to entice them into sexual activity with them and by making lewd suggestions to the girls. This bastard is unlikely to change his ways as his paedophilia is not the result of some internal genetic aberration or because of some fault in his upbringing, he’s a noncing bastard because Islam has no respect for women or children or even the British law. Khalid has probably been brought up by a family who fed him a supremacist form of Islam and one that may well have told him to treat non Muslim women and children like dirt or as objects to be used.
This case also opens up some criticism of Greater Manchester Police. This defendant’s mobile phone should have been examined much earlier than it was, if indeed the phone was in the police’s possession, which it was although Khalid refused to disclose the password. It should not have waited until after Khalid’s initial sentencing for child sexual enticement for these messages from Khalid to have come to light. Maybe if Khalid’s phone had been examined earlier, this savage nonce might have been given a harsher sentence initially. Having more than one target for Khalid’s monstrous Islamic lust may well have been seen as an aggravating factor in the initial sentencing. It was only with the emergence of Facebook logs of Khalid’s messages that turned up during a separate investigation into alleged fraudulent activities by Khalid that these extra child sex offences came to light at all.
This really looks a lot to me like police incompetence. The police should have seen Khalid’s refusal to disclose the password as an indication of Khalid having something more to hide and extra effort made to crack the phone’s password or to prosecute Khalid under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 for failing to disclose. From what I can see the police were well within their rights to demand this disclosure both on the grounds of the severity of the crimes that Khalid was accused of and by Khalid’s long criminal record.
Khalid got off relatively lightly at his original sentencing because the police did not have enough information to ensure that this savage nonce was gaoled for a sufficient amount of time. But, if the police had made more effort, there may have been no need for this extra hearing and Khalid could be inside for a lot longer than he was initially given. I’m glad that this savage is now off the streets but the police do not seemed to have covered themselves in glory regarding the way that they have managed the Khalid case.
