Various Islamic grievance mongers, the Left wing press and sadly Dave Rich of the Jewish Community Security Trust (a man who should be putting his energy into protecting British Jews), have been having the usual over the top fit of the vapours over allegations of ‘Islamophobia’. The Tell Mama group, Mr Rich of the CST and the Daily Mirror have been shroud waving over Islam -criticial comments made by members and representatives of the Conservative Party.

This turning on the Tories by these groups, seems to be linked with the Conservative Party’s recent decision to hold an enquiry into all prejudice and bigotry, rather than an enquiry specifically looking at the dislike of the religion of special demands and exploding to pieces, aka Islam. Reports in left wing media have included the delightful Baroness Warsi whining on the BBC about how including other groups in the enquiry will ‘dilute’ the focus on ‘Islamophobia’. My view on that is tough titty Baroness Warsi, stop whining and accept what has been offered.

Many of those whining about Tory members who are Islam-critical are ironically whining not about ‘fake news’ about Islam, but matters that are both true and provable. The case of Redcar Conservative councillor Malcom Griffiths is a case in point. It is also a good example of the complete and utter BS that comes out of the mouths of the likes of Dave Rich, Baroness Warsi, the Leftist media and whoever has control of the Tell Mama Twitter account today.

First of all let us look at what some these groups and individuals had to say about Islam critical Tories including Cllr Griffiths. Tell Mama retweeted Dave Rich the policy director of the CST who called for Cllr Griffiths and others to be expelled from the Tory party.

Tweet from Dave Rich which was retweeted by the taxpayer funded Tell Mama organisation.

Before I continue to outline exactly what is wrong with how Cllr Griffiths has been criticised, I’d like to take the opportunity to expand on a particular criticism of Dave Rich. I have to say how terribly dangerous it is for the rest of us British Jews to have high profile British Jews like Dave Rich being seen to call for censorship or for the censuring of those who criticise Islam. Islam should be exposed to criticism, just as any other ideology or religon should be under a free and open society. It does the rest of us little good to see our Jewish representatives such as Dave Rich ordering parties about and telling the country what can and cannot be talked about. Such behaviour is a gift to anti-Semites of both the Right and the Left.

Dave Rich’s intervention in this story and the manner and which he has done so ,will be taken, erroneously I might add, by anti-Semites as evidence of ‘Jewish control ‘ over British politics. Maybe if Mr Rich ceased for a short while engaging in political fellatio with the Islamic community and stepped outside of London and the salons of the middle class Left, then he may learn something from those of us who take the time to observe how interventions like Mr Rich has undertaken, look outside of his little bubble. As far as I can see such interventions and virtue signalling does no good whatsoever.

What is ironic about the various bits of ‘Islamophobia’ whining that have gone on regarding the comments made by Cllr Griffiths is that some of them, especially regarding the issue of Islamic inbreeding and the problems it cases, are backed up by a lot of evidence. There is an inbreeding problem in Islamic communities and that information comes from a variety of sources ranging from ex-Muslims right through to Britain’s National Health Service. Back in 2014, this blog reported on figures released by the Child Death Overview Panel that covers the heavily Islamised Bradford area of Yorkshire concerning Islamic inbreeding. This report stated that 60% of the Muslim marriages in the area were consanguinous, between people so closely related that it was more likely that birth defects and still births would be the result. In 95 of the child deaths examined by the overview panel, one third of the deaths were due to congenital conditions caused by the parents being too closely related. Bradford also leads the way in congenital defects and chromosomal abnormalities. In 187 out of 459 diagnoses of these conditions that led to a child’s death, Bradford had a figure of 41% of these abnormalities causing a child’s death as opposed to a national rate of 24%.

Ex-Muslims also back up the claims made by Cllr Griffiths that inbreeding is a problem. The excellent ex-Muslim YouTuber ‘Apostate Prophet’ has also examined this issue and has found that Islamic countries and countries with significant Islamic minorities such as India, all have high levels of inbreeding.

In a brilliant and concise video produced on the Apostate Prophet channel last year, the creator showed a map with different colours for the highest and lowest levels of inbreeding. As you can see from the screenshot of the map, it’s only the most heavily populated Islamic areas of the world that suffer so greatly from this inbreeding scourge. Inbreeding does not only cause neonatal deaths that could be avoided, it also causes massive levels of physical and mental disabilities that cause individual families untold grief. It may even, over the long term, account for the lack of development and innovation coming out of the Islamic world? The prospects for a nation or group of nations that continually damage their gene pool and therefore possibly their communal IQ, are not that good.

In this map, the darker areas are the places with the most inbreeding.  You will notice that apart from the Canadian and Sth American figures (which may be down to small indigenous groups with a smaller gene pool) these are the areas that are most dominated by Islam or who have large Islamic minorities.

I would most strongly recommend that you take the time to watch the short video by Apostate Prophet on the subject of Islamic inbreeding. It is measured, accurate and explains exactly how these massive numbers of cousin marriages, stem from Islamic theology itself.

Now you may or may not agree with some of the other comments that Cllr Griffiths has allegedly said back in 2017. You may either agree or disagree with his comment that Muslims should bugger off out of Britain, but he still should have a right to say that, whether you like it or not. However, on the subject of Islamic inbreeding it’s plain to see that Cllr Griffiths is not being jumped on by the various Islamic grievance mongers and leftists and those, like Dave Rich, who should know better, for stuff that is untrue, but for stuff that is true. I’m all for calling out those who lie, but why on Earth should Cllr Griffiths be criticised for stating something about Islamic inbreeding that is not just true, but which can be proven to be true?

As far as I am concerned, at least on the subject of his comments on Islamic inbreeding, Cllr Malcom Griffiths has done nothing wrong. He told the truth and the truth should never be criminalised or bullied out of the public arena. If there is anyone in this whole story who should feel ashamed of their actions, it is those who are laying into a man for telling the truth about the awful problems caused by generations of inbreeding by Muslims. This inbreeding among Muslims is yet another example of how time and time again, in diverse places and ages, it is individual Muslims and their families who pay the awful price for Islamic theology in the form of dead or sickly children brought about by Islamic inbreeding practises.