Following the leak of the report by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) into the Rotherham Islamic Rape Gangs scandal to the Times newspaper, South Yorkshire Police have bee forced to admit what many of us ordinary plebs knew all along. South Yorkshire Police (SYP) have admitted that they abandoned hundreds if not thousands of British girls to the many Islamic Rape Gangs that were and probably still are, operating in their policing area.

These uniformed cowards from South Yorkshire Police blatantly ignored complaints from mostly English girls that they were being grossly sexually abused and raped by Muslim men. This information came out after the IOPC upheld six complaints by a victim of an Islamic Rape Gang that the police took ‘insufficient action to protect the victim from harm’. The police did this, as one unnamed officer admitted, to keep the Muslims quiet as in the police’s eyes it wouldn’t do to stir up trouble with the ‘Asians’. The police basically ran scared of Muslim thugs and troublemakers and in order to appease the local Muslim population of Sth Yorkshire, let Rotherham’s male Muslim population rape their way through approximately 1400 of that town’s young English female residents.

This police force took the cowardly and wrong decision that it was a better way to keep the peace to appease Muslims, even when they were committing some of the most gross sexual crimes Britain has seen in many a year, by allowing women and in many cases children to be raped. Our British children were to South Yorkshire Police considered as expendable when compared to what the police saw as the far more important task of keeping the local Muslims sweet and not rioting because one or more of their number had been arrested for a sexual crime.

This is shameful conduct by South Yorkshire Police on a number of levels. By allowing these Muslims to rape with virtual impunity, South Yorkshire Police have failed to police their area equitably. The police in Sth Yorks have in effect ‘allowed justice to be sold’ and sold at the cost of young girls lives. The police have failed to honour the oath that every constable swears to abide by when they join the police. They have failed to uphold the law impartially, have not acted with fairness, have been monstrously partial towards Muslims and Islam and have definitely not upheld the human rights of the victims of these Islamic Rape Gangs. The senior and indeed middle management of South Yorkshire Police have tossed into the bin what they promised to do when they were wet behind the ears junior police constables, which is to uphold the law without fear or favour or discharge their duties according to the law.

The police officers of South Yorkshire worked in a culture which saw the mostly white working class victims as ‘scum’ and not worth bothering about,whilst at the same time this force was and still is obsessed with matters of ‘diversity’ and pandering to minority ‘protected’ groups. Sadly, working class girls and children are not classed as a ‘protected’ group in the 2010 Equality Act therefore these girls were left to suffer the most appalling abuse at the hands of mostly Muslim abusers. The police sold these girls to these Islamic Rape Gangs for little more than a mess of pottage, in this case the worthless geegaw of the satisfaction of not being called ‘racist’ by the local Muslim community.

I am utterly astonished by the cowardice of the police when it comes to their fears of public disorder should they have arrested the perpetrators of these crimes and even more sick-making it is a cowardice that has gone on for decades. For at least thirty years, from the late 1980’s onward, South Yorkshire Police systematically ignored complaints of abuse by Muslims of non-Muslim women and young children. They were of course, as have many in our Leftist controlled nation, fearful of being called a ‘racist’, but they were also fearful of any reaction from the Muslim community if they had taken seriously the complaints made to them by alleged victims. They knew that there was a significant likelihood that the Muslim population would riot and engage in acts of public disorder and possibly attacks on the police at worst should the police uphold the law and arrest the alleged perpetrators of sex crime. At best the police would have been worried that the Muslim community in the area would withhold cooperation with the police and make the job of policing other crimes in the area much more difficult.

But, these excuses don’t wash with me. In a country like the United Kingdom where the subjects are not normally allowed arms to defend themselves, the police serve the function of being the strong arm wrapped around the weak. The police are the ones who are trained and equipped to deal with the sort of communal rebellion that could be expected if a large number of ‘Abduls’ and ‘ ‘Mohammeds’ started to be arrested for these sex crimes. The police have access to an enormous amount of weapons and equipment and powers to control public disorder that are not available to the ordinary British subject. We have to rely on the police yet the police on this occasion and on this subject in South Yorkshire have let people down badly. South Yorkshire Police had access to both the manpower and the equipment to put down any riots by these Muslims but they chose to appease the Muslim community instead by letting the rapes and sexual exploitation continue. The police let the Muslim community of Rotherham and elsewhere in their fiefdom call the shots whereas what the police should have been doing is facing them down and telling them that it’s the police that have the biggest stick and that it would be used if the Muslim’s rioted.

Since this story, or rather the latest incarnation of this story broke last week, it’s not the apology that we’ve had from South Yorks Police that has interested me, an apology for decades of ignoring mass Muslim rapes in their area, is to be quite frank, not enough but just the start. What got my attention is what is not being said by certain groups about the story. I was out and about and listening to BBC Radio Five Live and their coverage of the story was a masterpiece of obfuscation. The subeditors of the BBC News did in my view to the right thing by making this the lead story on a news bulletin, but they blotted their copybook by failing to mention that the Islamic Rape Gangs were majority Islamic. The BBC used the word ‘Asian’ and they used the word ‘Pakistani’ but they failed to mention the salient point that the offenders in these gruesome sexual exploitation gangs were Muslim. I could have recovered some respect for the BBC if it had told the truth here. The majority of these perpetrators of these sexual exploitation crimes are not ‘Asians’, not Asian Sikhs, Hindus, Jews, Christians, Jains or Buddhists, but Muslim and the BBC should have been honest and said so.

Also remarkably and unusually silent were the mendacious grievance mongers of the Tell Mama organisation. I checked their Twitter feed this morning and there is little or nothing from what I could see about the admission by the police that they let gangs of Muslim men rape children. Personally I’m not surprised that they are keeping silent, they know that they have nothing to say on this and they can’t even slag off Tommy Robinson because after all, with the police admission that they were malfeascent, Mr Robinson has been proved correct in what he said about Rotherham and South Yorkshire Police. Tell Mama are also remarkably quiet on this occasion when compared to how they’ve dealt with the issue of Islamic Rape Gangs in the past. In a piece on the Tell Mama website dated October 20^th 2018 (copied below in case it disappears down a memory hole) the group complained vehemently about the then Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s use of the term ‘Sick Asian paedophiles’ to describe the Islamic Rape Gangs. Tell Mama also in this article attempted to divert attention away from the specific problem of on street grooming, where there is a preponderance of Muslim suspects, by saying that most grooming is undertaken by white Britons. The fact that the majority of grooming cases are white Britons is something that is not in dispute as most people in Britain are white therefore of course the broad category of grooming by all types of modus operandi is going to be dominated by white Britons. By failing to look specifically at on street grooming Tell Mama played a statistical sleight of hand here, something that they have become infamous for. Tell Mama play the ‘poor me’ game in their criticism of the then Home Secretary by making it seem as if it is Muslims themselves who are the victims of the attention now at last being paid to the issue of Islam -related sex crime. Tell Mama made claims that Mr Javid’s words made Muslims vulnerable to ‘hate’. Tell Mama said:

We have previously highlighted how the grooming issues have created a backlash against ordinary Muslims and whilst there is a collective need to challenge the behaviours of predatory men, there have also been much wider impacts in areas such as Rotherham. Many Muslim women in Rotherham have voiced their experiences of being targeted for anti-Muslim hate.

The language of the Home Secretary, contained with the following tweet, is not acceptable. Whilst we believe that the Home Secretary meant that ‘no no-go’ areas equated to a desire to discuss anything – the terminology can be misread as re-enforcing ‘Sharia no-go zones’, which is an anti-Muslim trope. Such a tweet is therefore extremely confusing and further exacerbated issues by the use of ‘sick Asian paedophiles’.

When you read this piece and see their desperation that the Home Secretary not speak to loudly of the issue of Islamic Rape Gangs it becomes somewhat understandable why, when I looked at their Twitter feed, Tell Mama have been so quiet when has come to the latest developments in this story. They arrogantly slagged off a Home Secretary and it turns out that he was right about the ‘sick Asian peadophiles’ that have been plaguing Rotherham and other British towns and cities. Tell Mama also, in the quoted article, dripped some crocodile tears for the victims of these rape gangs but still didn’t let it get in the way of yet another whinge – and a publicly funded to the tune of £1.9M whinge at that – about how it is Muslims who are the real victims here. Yes I agree nobody in their right mind wants nice innocent Mr Mohammed who runs the newsagents to be targeted because he is merely the same religion as the sex beasts, but this sort of thing is less likely to happen than the hyperbole spewed by Tell Mama would have you believe. A Muslim in Britain is far far safer in Britain than a Jew or a Christian would be in many Islamic countries of the world. The fact that Britain, despite being a target of Islamic terror on a number of occasions in recent decades, has not seen the sort of pogroms against Muslims that groups like Tell Mama like to claim might be just around the corner, is testament not only to the laudable tolerance of the average Briton, but also to the dishonesty of the ‘Muslims as victims’ narrative.

If the world is even the tiniest bit just, then I hope and pray that the admission by South Yorkshire Police, marks a time of change in the way that we are policed and a period of bringing the guilty, both the sex offenders themselves and the police officers who enabled them, before the courts for trial. What has happened in South Yorkshire and in other forces regarding Islam-based sex crime is truly monstrous with officers callously chucking desperate young girls back into the clutches of the rape gangs because it was too much trouble for the police to bother with. They cowed, bent backed and supplicant before the Muslim community of Rotherham and the result has been misery for thousands.

There has been so much actual and alleged malfeasance in South Yorkshire Police and indeed other forces where these crimes have occurred, that I don’t believe that the public will be satisfied by the police’s internal disciplinary procedures when it comes to those officers who have deliberately ignored serious crime. I do think that these officers need to be brought before the courts where there are allegations that they had failed to uphold the law or where they had issued orders that the Muslim community in Rotherham was to be appeased. The public trial, examination and possible punishment of those officers who allowed all these girls to be raped and enslaved is in my view that absolute minimum of what is required by the public when it comes to South Yorkshire Police.

I also believe that the sort of culture that political correctness and ‘Islamopandering’ created in South Yorkshire means that although guilt for the permitted enslavement of British girls by these Muslim gangs, should primarily be borne by middle and senior management at South Yorkshire Police, every rank is culpable. This is a classic example of an scandal where the Nuremberg Defence i.e. ‘I was only following orders’ should not be allowed. Although senior officers should bear the brunt of the guilt over the Islamic Rape Gangs, it is the lower ranks, down to Constable, who implemented the policy of not angering the Muslims that was handed down to them. They could have spoken up but didn’t, they could have resigned and blown the whistle but didn’t and they chose also not to enforce the law equitably or fairly.

It’s time for a clear-out of all the policies that have contributed to this utter disaster of policing. The cult of diversity needs to be removed from its parasitical place in policing organisations and the culture of equitable policing, you know, the sort of policing that we all truly want, brought back. The influence of communal groups on police forces should be reduced, groups that whine about ‘Islamophobia’ or ‘transphobia’ for example should not be allowed to create police policy or influence operational matters, something that has too often occurred. These groups should be kept at arms length by police forces because there is the inherent danger that the police will, because these groups paint themselves as ‘experts’ in what ever ‘diversity’ flavour is being pushed, end up listening to groups with agendas rather than the Briton on the street who they are supposed to be listening to and serving. South Yorkshire Police listened to the siren call of those with ‘diversity’ and other religious-political agendas and by doing so directly contributed to the sacrifice of these young girls to the Islamic Rape Gangs. We must never see this happen again. Maybe if we close down the police ‘diversity’ departments and remove these politicised parasites from police operations then we might just get the equitable and fair policing that Britons, no matter what our skin colour or faith may be, deserve and have been denied for too long.

Appendix:

Quoted TM article. Just in case it goes missing for some reason

The Home Secretary’s statement (below), which highlighted ‘sick Asian paedophiles’, is something that should have been measured and not made on Twitter in a flippant manner. This also goes for a tweet response made by us agreeing with the need to challenge grooming and which has been used to promote a mobbing campaign against us by some, driven by community politics.

We have previously highlighted how the grooming issues have created a backlash against ordinary Muslims and whilst there is a collective need to challenge the behaviours of predatory men, there have also been much wider impacts in areas such as Rotherham. Many Muslim women in Rotherham have voiced their experiences of being targeted for anti-Muslim hate.

The language of the Home Secretary, contained with the following tweet, is not acceptable. Whilst we believe that the Home Secretary meant that ‘no no-go’ areas equated to a desire to discuss anything – the terminology can be misread as re-enforcing ‘Sharia no-go zones’, which is an anti-Muslim trope. Such a tweet is therefore extremely confusing and further exacerbated issues by the use of ‘sick Asian paedophiles’.

Nobody disagrees with the facts. There have been a number of cases that have involved South Asian males and these cases have been used by far right groups to target innocent Muslims. Let us also be mindful that grooming is an issue across all communities, with the highest percentage of groomers being white males. Which is why as the Home Secretary, his tweet comments should have been more measured, given the position he holds and given that individuals will be influenced by the Home Secretary’s comments.

The current atmosphere in our country is polarised. The last thing we need is language that can be misread, abused or used to fan the flames of division. We agree with much that the Home Secretary does on tackling hate crimes, including anti-Muslim hate or Islamophobia, but on this matter, we disagree. We all need to ensure that communities feel accepted and respected at this time, whilst the victims of grooming should be first and foremost in our minds.

At this moment in time, our thoughts are with the victims and their families. That is where the focus should be and not to politicise this issue. We need an open debate on these issues, but not at the expense of other people and communities.