Back in July 2018 the former Home Secretary Sajid Javid did a very brave and noble thing, at least in the context of our political classes that is. He ordered his civil servants at the Home Office to do a thorough examination of the grooming of children and to be unsparing in their search for truth. At the time Mr Javid said: “We know that in these recent high profile cases, where people convicted have been disproportionately from a Pakistani background.
“I’ve instructed my officials to explore the particular contexts and characteristics of these types of gangs.” This is what I and many others, who have been concerned about the growth of on street child grooming and the religious and cultural motivations that lay behind them, wanted to hear coming from the mouth of a Home Secretary.
It appears that the report was completed as per the former Home Secretary’s instructions, but after Mr Javid became Chancellor of the Exchequer, the public heard nothing from the government about the report. The report lay hidden until the government told reporters from the left-leaning Independent newspaper that the report had been completed but it would not be released to the public as it was for internal use only. It was protected, the Home Office civil servants said because it was a document concerned with ‘policy making.’
The Independent challenged this decision and submitted a Freedom of Information Act request, which the government refused. They made all manner of excuses ranging from the aforementioned ‘policy making’ exemption to the FOIA, claims that the report would be taken ‘out of context’, citing easily remediable ‘police operational reasons’ and most bizarrely, that releasing the report would not be ‘in the public interest’.
How on earth can it not be in the public interest for the public to be informed of social and cultural phenomena that is endangering our children and young women, in this instance the phenomena of Islamic Rape Gangs? Shouldn’t we all be informed by the government of the findings of this report so that we can better protect our children both as parents and collectively, from harm? If the government was instead of Islamic Rape Gangs investigating a novel recreational drug, do you think that the Home Office would be so wary about releasing information that could protect young people? Of course they would not. As with the original Ecstasy panic, the government of the day would throw money and effort at the issue. So why not be honest with the public with regards the grooming report? I’ll come to that later.
Some of the other excuses are laughable in the extreme if they were not related to such a serious subject. Both the ‘policy making’ and the ‘police operational’ excuses are just that, excuses. The issue is easily remediable by way of selective redaction of the report to remove things like ongoing investigations and Civil Servants advice to ministers which would come under these categories. As for ‘taking the report ‘out of context’ then this is unlikely to happen if the vast majority of the report is released. A report that was too heavily redacted though would fail to satisfy the public, who both need and deserve answers and solutions to on street grooming and Islamic Rape Gangs. Such a heavily redacted report would indeed be easily taken out of context , as it will be perceived as ‘bent’. In that case why doesn’t the Home Office bite the bullet and release the whole report minus a relatively small section that relates to police investigations and advice to ministers?
I can see a very good reason why the Home Office civil servants want to keep this report quiet. It could be that what this report has uncovered is far worse than we may have imagined this problem to be. We already know from preliminary information into child protection with regards grooming, that 19,000 children were groomed and sexually exploited in 2019. Yes of course some of this grooming and exploitation will be peer to peer or intra-familial or via the web, but a lot of it seems to be happening in Islam-heavy areas. Back on December 31st 2019 I said:
Some of the highest numbers of sexual exploitation cases have been found in areas such as Leeds, Bradford and Lancashire, areas heavily dominated politically and socially by Islam. In the combined Leeds and Bradford area for example, the number of cases of Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) was 649. Lancashire was the single local authority that had the most cases of CSE at 624. Compare these figures to Gloucestershire, which only has a 3.2% Muslim population level which has had 409 cases.
We can see from the released figures that the highest numbers of CSE cases come from areas that have a significant Islamic population and where, in the past, the Labour Party has dominated the area politically. This discrepancy in numbers between areas like Gloucestershire with relatively few Muslims and areas with more Muslims is quite stark. This discrepancy does suggest that the sort of CSE that is occurring in Gloucestershire is different from that which is happening in the North of England. It may well be that outside of Islam / Labour dominated areas, such as in Gloucestershire for instance, abuse and exploitation may be more of a peer to peer issue whereas in other areas with more Musilms, Islam related sexual abuse is more common.
These initial numbers of cases that the government has released details of are considerably higher than I would have expected them to be. They are nearly double what I, someone who has observed this problem for some time, would have guessed the total to be. Whilst I admit that some of the high numbers of CSE reports may be down to better reporting and recording practises by police and social services, the number of cases is still very worrying and far too high.
I suspect, and others are I believe coming to the same conclusion as I am, that the result of the report shows that the problem of specifically Islamic Rape Gangs and the collusion between the police and these offenders is far worse than we or the former Home Secretary expected. All I can say is that there must have been an awful lot of Islamic activists, police officers and ‘diversity’ promotion types, from both local and central government, leaning on the Home Office in order to get this report suppressed. After all it is these groups that stand to lose the most if they were held up to public scrutiny. We would be able to see the Islamic groups that claimed that there is no Islamic Rape Gang problem exposed as liars, see the lazy, immoral, box ticking ‘only following orders guv’ police officers shown to the public, along with the influence of Left leaning ‘diversity’ policies on the way we are governed. We both need and deserve this information in order to solve the problems we are suffering from in a sensible manner via the political, administrative and policing systems.
I believe that at heart the Home Office is scared shitless. They must be to suppress this report with such lame and contradictory excuses. If, as I suspect, that this report shows that the problem of Islamic Rape Gangs is not only far bigger than we imagined and confirms what many of us believe that there is a religious and cultural component in these rape gangs, then the Home Office may be panicking about the public’s reaction to it. This is especially the case if the report contains information that is highly unflattering to Islam. Say for example, that the report confirmed that which many non Muslims living in Islamic areas suspect, that there is a communal and religious tacit permission to rape non-Muslims which in turn is strengthened by Islamic racism and culturalism aimed towards non-Muslims, I can see that causing anger that is both great and quite frankly justified.
However, it is my belief that withholding this report from the public risks even greater anger than releasing it. This is because by withholding the release of the report the Home Office is in effect telling Britons, the non-Muslim part no matter our race or creed, that we don’t matter. That the concerns of citizens who are worried about this problem and those who have survived it and who are still going through it, are of little importance. For the Home Office it seems that protecting the Islamic community from what are inevitably going to be harsh questions, takes priority over everything else, even the safety of British children. This is the message that the Home Office is sending out by suppressing this report.
Holding back this report from the public is perversely going to feed the very narratives that the Home Office may not have been trying to feed by suppressing this report. Hiding the report from the public is in particular feeding the narrative that the state cares nothing for non Muslim Britons and only protects the followers of Islam. Also it feeds the narrative that there are elements in the state such as in policing and local government, that believe that a few kilo-rapes or 19 kilo-rapes even, is a small price to pay for ‘community cohesion’ and not have violent members of the Islamic community rioting on their doorsteps.
The Home Office, maybe under the influence of Islamic groups or advisors or from police forces struggling with a lack of resources, could be fearful that the release of this report may spark of a pogrom against Muslims. Personally I don’t believe that such a thing would happen, I think Britons on the whole are far more sensible than that, I have more faith in my fellow countrymen than it seems do the Home Office. I don’t believe that the average Briton would, if this report was released in as complete a state as possible, go around torching mosques or any deplorable and downright wrong stuff like that. I think that releasing the report would cause a lot of justifiable anger about the real extent of Islamic Rape Gang activity and the driving forces behind it, but it will not, at least in my view end in pogroms. The vast majority of Britons are sensible enough to know that not every Muslim man is a rapist or potential rapist and that there is a difference between the Muslim individual and the ideology of Islam. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, there area lot of decent Muslim individuals out there but they are decent not because of Islam but in spite of it. Whilst Islamic communities seem to produce a disproportionate amount of rapists, it’s wrong to believe that all of them are. There needs to be a political and policing assault on the issue of Islamic Rape Gangs not wild men with flaming torches and bad attitudes.
I do think that if the report was released in an acceptably complete form, then of course some difficult questions would be asked of Britain’s Islamic communities, community leaders and organisations, by both the public and the mainstream and alternative media. It’s quite understandable that, if this report does contain damning intelligence about Britain’s Islamic communities, the public should ask awkward and sometimes challenging questions of certain Muslims about Islam and firmly ask that they, in the words of the Prophet Jeremiah, ‘Keep the peace of the city in which you are exiled’. It’s not really a lot to ask is it, be peaceful and don’t rape and kill our children? We would want to see Imams and community leaders properly condemn what has gone on and take part in steps to stop it, this would be reasonable. Only by lancing this boil publicly and openly can a lot of the problems both with the phenomena of Islamic rape gangs and of community cohesion (or rather lack of it) be properly dealt with by the government with the backing of a public who is fully informed about what has been going on. If we want to solve these problems then they need to be debated in the open and not censored and forgotten in some ‘sleepy hollow’ archive somewhere.
Contrary to what the Home Office seems to think, I think suppressing this report will not calm things down but will make things worse. Because the Home Office has suppressed this report it will engender a whole new raft of speculation about what it contains. Some of that speculation will be accurate but a lot I would imagine be completely wrong and off the wall. The problem is any falsehoods in the speculation, and I can well imagine what sort of false speculations could be made, will probably engender more anger among the public than would the release of the report itself. If you wanted to make a decision that would make community cohesion much worse than it is already then the Home Office has gone down the correct path by which to do that. This boil could have been lanced quickly by the Home Office releasing this report but instead they’ve decided to leave this boil to grown and possibly become malignant.
Not releasing this report is the very worst of decisions that could have very bad outcomes, outcomes that should if possible be avoided. I hope that this is a decision that has not come from the Home Secretary Pritti Patel herself, if it has then my previous respect for her will be going out of the window. However I suspect that the decision has been made by senior civil servants or maybe by a junior Home Office minister because they are all scared shitless of the adverse reaction that the report will without doubt have and also how it will affect the careers and reputations of those in Britain’s ‘Adminisphere’. But, whoever made this decision it’s a bad one and one that I’d really like to see the Home Secretary review. We need this information in order to stop what is going on and it is in no way against the public interest to not give us this information. The Home Office should not be hiding this vital information from the public, that they consider that they should, disgusts me and should disgust others.
