At first I was delighted to read on the Guido Fawkes site yesterday that the Home Office under Home Secretary Pritti Patel is, following pressure from both outside and inside Parliament, going to release a report on organised child sexual exploitation. However, after reading the Guido piece in more detail and thinking about the language that the Home Office has used in their statement to the public, I believe that the Government are going to try to whitewash this report.

The reason I say this is that the Government said that they would publish ‘a’ report, not ‘the’ report as commissioned by former Home Secretary Sajid Javid. This suggests to me and to others such as Sargon of Akkad, that what will be released will be nothing like the report that Mr Javid commissioned. The report that the Government is promising to release later this year may be heavily censored and may not even deal with the very well documented, by both victims and perpetrators of these bestial sex crimes, religious and cultural aspects of the offences.

We know from numerous trials and accounts from victims that the perpetrators of these crimes targeted their victims because of their race, ethnicity and religion. We know from these accounts how adverse comparisons between non-Muslim and Muslim girls were made by the offenders and how non-Muslim girls were considered by them to be subhuman lesser beings.

It has been well established that the members of Islamic Rape Gangs are heavily influenced by both religion and racialism when it comes to motivation for the offences and the choice of victim. Whilst predominantly the victims of these Islamic Rape Gangs are White British girls, there are also a lot of victims from communities that have traditionally and historically suffered greatly from Islamic violence and hatred, such as the Sikh and Hindu communities.

Rarely do these gangs seem to target Muslim girls and although there is intra-communal sexual abuse in Islamic communities, it is often familial and opportunistic, such as a father abusing his daughter or a Koran teacher abusing his female students. These gangs do not as a rule target Muslim girls and that fact goes a long way to show that there is a racialist and religious aspect to these crimes. Whether the Home Office and the Government will openly acknowledge the racialist and religious aspects of these offences is doubtful in my view. This is because for the Home Office and Government to admit this will go against the narrative that they’ve been feeding us for years, which is that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’ and that Islam is no more a threat to Britons than is Methodism.

I suspect that the Government and the Home Office will be reluctant to put this narrative to one side and be honest about Islamic Rape Gangs, for to admit that there is a religious and racialist driver behind these sexual offences will blow the whole idea of top down multiculturalism and the false ‘religion of peace’ narrative about Islam, right out of the water. Also, various UK governments have spent a lot of time and public money trying to demonise people like Tommy Robinson, who spoke up about the problems of Islamic extremism and sexual exploitation. It would be a massive climb-down for the Government to have to admit that when it comes to the issue of Islamic Rape Gangs, Mr Robinson was correct all along.

Further fuel for the suspicion that the Home Office and the Government is preparing a massive whitewash comes from one section of the Government’s statement on this issue as quoted by Guido. The section reads: “Priti Patel’s department will set up an external reference group of experts to review the research before its publication.” This course of action is highly odd with regards to a criminal justice issue. Bringing in ‘experts’, especially external ones, to review a report before publication is the sort of thing that happens with reports into national security issues. It’s the course of action that a government would take when releasing into the public domain a report into foreign governments spying on the United Kingdom. In that case the experts, possibly from MI6, would comb through a report destined for publication to remove information that could compromise British agents or intelligence techniques. This ‘external expert’ review appears to be highly unusual in the particular circumstance of a non-national security criminal justice issue. There has been and of course will continue to be speculation as to who these ‘external experts’ who will review the document prior to publication will be? Somehow I doubt it will be those who are independently minded on this issue who will be doing this job, but instead those who are already committed to the government’s narrative that top down multiculturalism works and that Islam is ‘a religion of peace’.

I’m not the only person saying that this new report is going to be a whitewash of this report which you will see if you read around the issue in various places. Nor, as I’ve said before on the matter of suppressing information on Islamic Rape Gangs, am I the only commentator who believes that this suppression of the report is counterproductive. One commentator on the Guido site called Teepee spoke of how the suppression of the report has emboldened the very extremists that suppression of the report was intended not to inflame.

Teepee said:

They already have done, in so many words. From their disgraceful initial response to the petition: “Extremists may also seek to exploit legitimate concerns to sow further division. The Government will continue to challenge these views and to help communities unite.” They only forgot to add “And do whatever TellMAMA and the MCB tell us.”

Teepee is spot on there. The act of suppressing the report has probably fed more extremists than would be the case if the report had been released as apparently Sajid Javid intended it to be and released to the public to its fullest possible extent, removing only those aspects of the report that related to ongoing police investigations. The release of this report in as full a condition as possible could have helped to lance what is a monstrous boil on Britain’s body politic and helped to start a much needed public debate on the issue. Hiding the details of this report is only and has only made things much worse. Sadly I would not be surprised to find out later that various Islamic grievance mongers and Islamic promotion outfits have been drafted in to redact and rewrite this report to remove any aspects of the report that show Islam in a bad light. Many of these groups are censorious when it comes to criticism of Islam and Muslims and even though some of them are in receipt of large amounts of public money, their primary function seems to be to run interference for Islam and support the government’s narrative that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’ even when we the average British subject can see that it is not.

I can smell the distinct odour of whitewash about the Government’s statement on this issue. I’m highly suspicious that the use of the term ‘A’ report rather than ‘the’ report means that we the people will get something very much different from what may have been intended by the former Home Secretary. I believe that what we will get from the Government will be a bland and worthless report that will not tackle the main issues. It’s also likely to be the case that the ‘experts’ that the government will choose to review this report before publication will be very biased. It’s likely that these ‘experts’ will be a combination of Leftist academics and various representatives of Islamic groups whose motivation and priorities will be to protect Islam from public criticism, rather than to help to put an end to these monstrous crimes.

Whilst I am pleased to see some movement from the Home Office on this issue, I am none too confident that what we will get from them will contain anything like that which needs to be said. As I said, I smell whitewash from the Government and it is a noisome smell indeed.