When I watched the story unfold live of Friday’s Glasgow stabbing rampage that has left at least six people injured, some very seriously, my first thought was that this might be terrorism of some sort. After all, many of the signs that it could have been terrorism of an Islamic nature were there. You had the nature of the attack, the appeals by identity politics groups not to speculate about the incident and the apparent randomness of the choice of victims.

However, it has turned out that this was not Islamic terrorism per se, just another violent incident carried out for very minor reasons by the sort of ‘refugee’ that Britain neither needs nor wants, behaving like a stabby savage. According to reports about the lead up to the incident that the mainstream media has bothered to give us, the perpetrator of the attack was a mentally unbalanced Sudanese man who had complained about noise in his taxpayer funded hotel accommodation.

What we know so far is that the man who carried out this attack, Badreddin Abadlla Adam, who was thankfully shot dead by armed police officers, came to Britain six months ago and was aged 28. What we don’t know is whether Badreddin Abadlla Adam is actually his real name as this information is based on what he told the UK Home Office, and the name he gave the UK government could be bogus. He could be anybody in reality but what is confirmed is that he was a danger to others and had even scared others hailing from the violent Islamic society of Sudan and whose worrying conduct was, according to Sky News, reported by other ‘refugees’ in the hotel to a ‘refugee liaison worker’ in Glasgow.

Neither the as yet unnamed ‘refugee liaison worker’ nor the UK Home Office seem to have taken any thought to the danger that this man must have obviously posed. The ‘refugee liaison worker’ doesn’t seem to have done much to either investigate the concerns raised about Badreddin Abadlla Adam, nor protect other residents and staff at the hotel from potential assault. It will be interesting to find out just where this ‘refugee liaison worker’ had come from and been working for. Was he or she working for the local authority the Glasgow City Council, or were they from one of the myriad ‘refugees welcome’ groups that have been set up by the Left? In any case there seems to have been some form of dereliction of duty in dealing with this stabby savage. If the ‘refugee liaison worker’ came from the council and was paid for by the taxpayer then it raises questions as to a) how effective they are at their jobs and are they worth the money that the taxpayer gives them and b) whose side are these ‘refugee liaison workers’ on? One potential answer based on what has come out so far is that they are not at all effective at their jobs or they would have acted sooner on the growing concerns about the stabby savage. The other possible answer is equally if not more worrying which is that this ‘refugee liaison worker’ cared more for the ‘refugee’ than they did about safety and security. This is the more local aspect of the scandal of the stabbing savage.

The other aspect of this scandal relates to the Home Office and is the more national aspect of it. It was the Home Office who let this bastard into the United Kingdom, the Home Office who agreed that he could stay as an ‘asylum seeker’ and the Home Office who dumped this stabby bastard onto the people of Glasgow. It is also the Home Office that is taking those who have no right to be in Britain and who will often be nothing but a burden to British society who are scattering these ‘refugees’ across the length and breadth of the United Kingdom. We should also not forget that the Home Office via its agency the Border Force, who are doing nothing at all to prevent mostly fake ‘refugees’ from entering the UK via a Channel crossing. These fake ‘refugees’ and chancers are being brought by Border Force to UK ports and then distributed across the country to who knows where. For all we know these cross Channel chancers, who more than likely contain many individuals like Badreddin Abadlla Adam, who are as equally mentally unbalanced and unsuitable for residence in a civilised nation, are probably being placed in many small market or county towns or even villages by the Home Office. I have little doubt that these cross Channel chancers will bring little that is good to the towns and cities where they are being dumped.

People should quite rightly be extremely angry at the Glasgow incident. They should of course be angry about the ‘refugee’ chancers themselves, they are often people whom Britain has no real use for. But people should reserve the bulk of their anger for the Home Office, the local authorities who eagerly crap on their local residents heads by enthusiastically providing homes and services for these ‘refugees’ and the ‘refugees welcome’ groups that have helped to cause and exacerbate Britain’s ‘refugee’ problems.

Back in December 2019, Britons voted in their droves for a Conservative Party that they believed would sort out not only Brexit, but also because they wanted a government that would effectively deal with the problems of crime, migration, border security and policing. From what I’ve seen so far both Boris Johnson the Prime Minister and Pritti Patel the Home Secretary have failed in all those areas. Nothing effective seems to be being done about real crime such as burglary, vandalism, robbery or sex crime and equally little seems to be going on with regards to securing Britain’s borders, reducing migration from societies incompatible with our own or bringing Britain’s police forces back to following Peelian standards. We still have issues with excess and unwanted migration, our Border Force is still a farce and still acting as a taxi service for cross Channel chancers, people who report real crime are unsatisfied with the response they get from police forces and these forces are still policing with a bias that is absolutely shocking.

This stabby Sudanese savage who nearly killed six people in Glasgow entered Britain not during the time of a previous government or a period where someone else was Home Secretary, he entered when Boris Johnson was Prime Minister and Pritti Patel was Home Secretary. Ultimately, for Britain’s migration and fake ‘refugee’ disaster, the buck stops with these two politicians, politicians who promised much when it came to migration, social cohesion and crime, but who so far have delivered very very little. This to me is the real scandal when it comes to this particular government.