I’m slightly later than usual in writing about this latest horrific case of some Bearded Savage going ‘full Islam’ in France, due to other commitments such as the Sabbath and the need to carry out an emergency repair a leaky roof. However, this delay has given me time to absorb and digest a variety of the coverage of this story.

On Friday the world saw yet another example of how a Muslim decided that they would use violence to settle a disagreement about freedom of speech. A savage Muslim from the Russian province of Chechnia, who had been given asylum in France, attacked and beheaded a teacher who had shown cartoons of Mohammed, the seventh century brigand whom Muslims claim is a ‘prophet’, during a discussion on the subject of freedom of speech. This reasonable act of using something contentious to show why freedom of speech is so important by the teacher, Samuel Paty, brought forth the all too usual and wholly unreasonable response from a Muslim of lethal violence.

The attack in the town of Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, 24Km from Paris, has quite correctly shocked France and the world and is not the first attack by Muslims in France recently angered by depictions of Mohammed. There was another attack in mid September on the former offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris where a Bearded Savage Muslim went on a rampage with a meat cleaver and seriously injured two innocent people.

The French state and its various security organs are treating this attack on the teacher as terrorism and not trying to cover it up by saying that the suspect, who was thankfully shot dead by police shortly after the attack, was ‘mentally ill’. French police have, according to some reports, arrested 9, members of the Muslim savage’s family, which will of course give rise to speculation that this attack was known about prior to it by more than just the attacker themselves. This veracity of this speculation will be strengthened by the knowledge that the savage’s half sister was a known associate of ISIS.

Many of the details of this case are depressingly familiar from other Islamic terror cases. You have the entry into a civilised country of the sort of Muslims who believe that non-Muslims should be killed, their entry facilitated by naive and borderline treasonous ‘refugees welcome’ groups. There is the failure by the imported Muslim to engage with or accept the culture of the host nation, despite the state, in this case the French state, doing all that they could to facilitate integration. There is also the very familiar factor of the terrorist Islamic savage having a family who also support extremism and who are living in an Islamic enclave surrounded by other Muslims who have no shame about poncing welfare off of the nation that they want to destroy. This is a problem that we see right across Western Europe, including in the United Kingdom, but France, with the highest numbers of Muslims in Europe, has these problems in far greater numbers. There are 5 million Muslims in France, if only 1% of them are violent radicals the that gives us a total of 50,000 potential threats to liberty and security wandering around France.

Successive French governments have tried every reasonable means to try to stop the growth of Islamic radicalisation. They’ve tried pandering to Muslims with welfare and additional assistance, they’ve tried education, they’ve tried banning religious symbols from schools but still the problems with Islam get worse and worse. President Emmanuel Macron’s latest idea is to try to roll back Islamic separatism by funding Mosques, training Imams, banning the home schooling where Islamic extremism is taught and removing the social accommodations that Muslims have gained, such as separate timeslots for men and women to swim in public bathing pools. Sadly I suspect that these efforts will, like all the other reasonable measures taken to stop Islamic separatism and extremism, fail dismally. I very much doubt that France’s increasingly extremist and separatist Islamic community will do what is required and set aside Shariah Law for the law of the French Republic. This is because the French state is not facing in Islam a reasonable religiously defined entity, such as Hindus, Sikhs, Jews or Roman Catholics, but an entity that is built on savagery and which lives on and approves of savagery. President Macron’s bold plan has already failed as he is linking France’s Islam related problems to the legacy of colonialism and the Algerian conflict and the previous Laissez-faire policy of turning a blind eye to Islamic ghettoisation. These are not the factors causing France’s Islam problems, it is Islam alone that is causing these problems.

As much as I personally would like to see emerge the ‘Islam of the Enlightenment’ that President Macron wants to see, I cannot see it happening. Islam violently destroys those who wish reform and crushes reform movements, something that we can plainly see in how the relatively peaceful Ahmediyya are treated in Islamic hell holes like Pakistan. In fact I can’t see any of the reasonable approaches that Macron is proposing with which to deal with France’s Islam problems working. After all many of these anti radicalisation approaches have been proposed elsewhere including in the United Kingdom and few have really worked to anything like the extent that they would need to work. I suspect that Macron’s attempt to roll back Islamic radicalism will bring forth much more Islamic violence. Since 2015 at least 250 people have been killed in France by Muslims carrying out very Islamic atrocities, it is depressingly likely that Macron’s fight back against Islamic radicalism will spur on more Islamic violence and push the death toll caused by Islam even higher than 250.

The French government is trying to use reasonable means to quell what has become the unreasonable problem of radical Islam. As much as I would like to see President Macron’s plan succeed, I fear it will fail just as badly as other attempts to deal with radical Islam in this manner will fail. This leads me to wonder what will happen if, as I believe inevitably, President Macron’s plan to deal with radical Islam fails? Will the French state and the French people realise that the reasonable approaches that civilised societies should always look to first to deal with problems of this nature have failed and instead, seeing nothing but national destruction coming from these reasonable approaches, demand responses that many would call unreasonable? Time will tell on this. But what I do know is that France is on the very brink of societal conflict. At present this conflict is relatively low level and confined to the ghettos and big cities, but it could easily get worse and when that happens all bets as to what might happen will be off.