A decidedly suspicious lack of description

The location of the latest savage waving a big knife incident in France. (Image from Wikipedia)

 

It’s our old ‘friend’ the machete wielding savage of no description again. French police arrest a ‘man’ armed with a machete following reports that said ‘man’ – a man suspiciously lacking in description – was seen waving the big knife around in a Paris Metro station. Police are also refusing to comment on any motive that the ‘man of no description’ may have had.

Surely publishing a description of this ‘man’ may have assisted the police in tracking his movements either before the incident in the Metro station or between the station and the hotel? I can’t for the life of me think why a description has not been given as it would have without a doubt helped the police with their investigation?

Are the French police or the British media that has reported this story not telling us the whole truth?

This is I’m afraid a distinct possibility. Let’s consider why this could be, but first we have to work out what group is most likely to produce people who have a tendency to go apeshit with a machete and threaten people in an underground station and then have to be prised out of their hotel room by tooled up police officers? Hmm! Now what group could that be? I suspect that this machete waving savage may belong to the religion of chopping infidels to pieces. It is quite possible of course that this is merely a ‘mental health’ episode and the machete waving fraggle is just a madman who as French as a baguette or a garlic butter coated cooked snail. However, it’s often not this sort of Frenchman who goes apeshit with big knives. It’s the other sort of ‘Frenchman’, you know the ones who follow a seventh century nonce and whose ‘holy’ book can be summed up in the words ‘kill, kill, kill’ who are given to waving big knives around.

Here’s how the UK Metro newspaper reported this incident:

A Paris street was put on lockdown this morning after reports a man armed with a machete barricaded himself inside a hotel room. Officers were called to the 11th arrondissement after witnesses reportedly saw a man brandishing a weapon inside Pére-Lachaise metro station at around 10.45am local time. He was later arrested inside his hotel room, according to local reports. News site Actu Paris said the Rue du Chemin-Vert was closed with workers told to stay inside as police hunted the suspect. At one point officers were spotted perched on the roof of a building meters away from the station.

The street was reopened at around mid-day and there are no reports of injuries. French police have not commented on the incident yet and the man’s motives are unclear. Local councillor Jean-Christophe Martin told people to avoid the area.

Sounds like a massive police presence for a lone mental case. Maybe the police suspected a lot more was going on than they are letting on? The lack of description here is very telling and very suspicious. Does anyone really think that if this was a normal non-savage French person called ‘Pierre’ then the police would have been so wary of voicing their suspicions about motive or so cowardly about giving out a description? Of course they would not. The lack of description itself lends itself to making us believe that this was yet another deranged Muslim running round with a knife, after all the use of the ‘suspect of no description’ excuse normally means that the suspect may be very easy to identify either through skin colour or mode of dress, but this is something that the politically correct both in police forces and in the media, do not want to highlight.  As for the comment by the local councillor, then I’d say that it’s not the area that people need to avoid but machete wielding savages, possibly Islamic ones.

I wonder when or if either the French police or the UK media will tell the whole story about this case, I won’t hold my breath waiting.

 

 

4 Comments on "A decidedly suspicious lack of description"

  1. Another PONA — I think most public have now realised PONA = not white

    “White youths attack Iranian asylum seeker talking to children”

    “Man kills three Gays with machete”

  2. Then when the (almost) inevitable “Mohammed” moment arrives, in some days/weeks time, we will be told “the Police are still trying to establish the motive for the attack.”

    Given the prevalent attitude in the UK I sometimes think the conversation between the Police (P) and suspect (S) in a UK Police station (yes I realise this one is in France, but still) must go something like this:

    P: So why did you massacre four people with a machete whilst screaming “Allahu akbar.”
    S: It was jihad in the way of Allah, so revenge insult to the Prophet(uponwhombepeace) by you Kaffir dogs!
    P: So you say, but what was your REAL motive?
    S (shouting): I just told you. I killed them in accordance with the laws of Islam for insults to Allah and the prophet(uponwhombepeace)! The laws of Islam prescribe death for such insults! Justice demands the death of Kaffirs as recompense for insults to the Allah, his book, his Prophet(uponwhombepeace) and his religion! When our beloved prophet (uponwhombepeace) is insulted ALL you Dhimmi Kaffir dogs are liable to be treated as people of defiance and rebellion!”
    P:Yes, yes, but what was your REAL motive?
    S (Screams and bangs hands on table, then shouts): By Allah and the prophet(uponwhombepeace)! Why aren’t you listening? I TOLD you why!
    P (shakes head and turns to P#2 who is observing): Look how disturbed he is, the poor man, he must be mentally ill. His actions can’t have anything to do with Islam which is the Religion of Peace. (Cue celestial music).
    S (Starts frothing at the mouth and banging head on table).
    P (Sighs): How sad, definitely mentally ill. He is clearly not responsible for his actions.

    Then we will be told that he is “a lone wolf” and “mentally ill”, so he won’t be charged with murder nor will there be an aggravated element due to the religious nature of the attack, the charge will have a “diminished responsibility” clause in it however.

  3. @Jon MC
    Excellent. May I repost?

  4. @Pcar
    Of course. Feel free to amend/improve. It was a very quick bit of satire (I hope).

Comments are closed.