As many of us expected, the Home Office report into group child sex activity has been a whitewash. The report has failed to take on board concerns that there was a religious aspect to these crimes when carried out by Muslims and has excluded many pages of information that came from those with great knowledge of the problem of Islamic Rape Gangs, people such as Maggie Oliver for example. The report is basically the government saying ‘move along nothing to see here’.
Those behind this report did not look at geographical areas of Britain where Islamic Rape Gangs are at their most prevalent, such as Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford and in fact excluded these areas from the study. The government didn’t even include ongoing cases where Muslims are being investigated, of which there are many, not even in an anonymised form to protect the investigations.
The report relied all too heavily in my view on the opinions of certain academics who have a long record of talking down the problem of Islamic Sex Crime and the report appears to have suffered from getting insufficient information from the police regarding the ethnicity of offenders and alleged offenders. Apparently the police couldn’t be arsed to record the ethnicity of a lot of those suspected or reported to be involved in CSE.
There’s a brilliant if sobering summary of this whitewash of a report over at Sargon’s Lotuseaters podcast channel which I have embedded below. What I will say is that this report could have been much better, more comprehensive and much more honest about the problems of Islamic Sex Crime than it has been. When a report like this is welcomed by both the Guardian and the Muslim Council of Britain then it’s probably wise to assume that it is not worth the paper it is printed on.
With respect to other items on your site, let’s be clear about one thing. There is no such thing as a moderate muslim. Every muslim, by definition, subscribes to the view that the whole world should submit to the barbaric, primitive, supremacist doctrine of sharia, That doctrine was dreamed up by maraurading bandit tribes in order to justify their subjugation, exploitation and abuse of their weaker neighbours. For muslims, the source of the doctrine of sharia is “allah”, a sadistic pathological liar, extremely ignorant of the very nature of the world which he is supposed to have created.
The individual extremist muslim is of course more dangerous to non-muslim individuals than the individual moderate muslim. But the four million, more or less, moderate muslims in the UK are doing what they can to see sharia reign supreme wherever they are. And no muslim will do anything to stop the implementation of what they see as a perfect social system.
Any non-muslim which does not understand the above is a more of a menace to society than the moderate muslim. I include Douglas Murray within that group, as in his book “Isamophilia” even he absolves “most” muslims from threatening the very existence of our society.
Though the extremists have not succeeded in their direct aim of overthrowing non-sharia societies (not recently, any way) they have contributed to the progress of muslims in undermining some of the key values of non-muslim societies, including our own
The extremists have distracted attention away from the main threat from islam. The main threat is the moderate muslim.
You make some very good points there and I concur that there is indeed an issue with so called moderate Muslims who, if the chips were down, may well side with the extremists if it was a straight choice between supporting Western values or supporting Islamic values. However where I would disagree is with the idea that all ‘moderate’ Muslims are dangerous. Whilst I agree that there are many ‘moderate’ Muslims who would be quite happy to see Sharia law in places like the UK, this moderate contingent is not homogeneous. Within it are those pretend moderates, those who would be moderate until an Islamic takeover and also those who call themselves Muslim but know the square root of sod all about what is in the Koran. It has been my experience of the latter types that has led me to believe that those who are considered as moderate but are that way because they know nothing about Islamic theology, may be able to be peeled away from Islam. It is the existence of those that could be rescued from this death cult by way of knowledge which prevents me classing all moderate Muslims as the same. There is nuance and variation and I’m proof of this as I’m a non Orthodox Jew who wants nothing to do with the Jewish Left but am also uncomfortable with some aspects of the Jewish religious right.
I completely agree with you however that the media and the political Establishment uses ‘moderate’ Muslims as a way to cover for Islam as a whole. One thing that I’ve noticed is the media’s use of Ahmediyyas, who are mostly peaceful and genuinely so, as representatives of all Islam even though the Ahmediyya are often violently oppressed by both sunni and shia groups in Islam.
@FH
Thanks for article – shared
@tamimisledus vs @FH
Side more with tamimisledus view. Have a look at number in UK who supported 9/11 and Charlie Hebro. Never forget Taqiyya
I can understand where @tamimisledus is coming from with their suspicion of all moderate Muslims but I know from studying Islam that there are many who are only in Islam through fear and I believe that it would be unjust to deal harshly with these fearful innocents as one would an extremist or a fellow traveller. I do however admit that the number of Muslims who would not normally be considered as extremists who publicly backed Islamic terror is worrying.