I was alerted by one of the commenters to this blog to the existence of a letter purporting to be from the illegal invaders who are currently being held in Napier Barracks, the former army camp in Kent. The letter was released allegedly by the invaders following an arson attack on the barracks that occurred a few days ago. At the time of writing, according to the Press Association, five people, presumably invaders, have been arrested by Kent Police on suspicion of Arson at the camp.

I sought out the letter, which has been published on the Kent Live website and have reproduced it below. There’s a lot about this letter that makes me very suspicious about whether this letter came from the invaders themselves, or if it came from some left wing group engaged in damage control activities. The leftists who are backing these invaders may be trying to protect themselves from criticism now that their invader pets have turned violent, something many of us expected to happen, or to try to excuse the actions of the fire starting invaders.

Here’s the letter as published in Kent Live.

“As one of the residents in Napier Barracks and on behalf of so many of my friends here, I want to express my sadness and sorrow for what had happened yesterday.

“It was horrible to see a building burning, see the fear in everyone’s eyes, and to see the staff in difficulty and pain.

“We want to say how sorry and disappointed we are, that this incident affected people. Especially the staff, firefighters, police and etc.

“As you all know, living in a terrible condition and unsafe when it comes to COVID, affected all the residents physically and mentally.

“Their protests, hunger strikes, and suicide attempts were all ignored from the Home Office.

“This incident was not something that we all wanted to happen. People respond to anger differently. Each of us react in our own unique way when we are desperate and disappointed.

“Some may protest peacefully, some refuse to eat, some commit suicide and when you are even more ignored some may lose control.

“I want you all [to] know that this is not something we all can approve. The majority of us are against violence as we escaped it.

“Words cannot express our shame and sadness, our solidarity with the ones who are affected by it.

“I also want to ask the Home Office and other authorities to take action against violence and also make sure that Napier Barracks will be closed as it is no longer safe and secure.

“It is mandatory to see the people in camps as human beings and desperate people.

“We are all the same, thus we express our emotions differently when we are under pressure.

“Last but not least, we all want to thank the police and firefighters who helped everyone to be safe and fine.

The letter was signed off: “Asylum seekers of Napier Barracks.”

There’s something about this letter that does not look right to me. Firstly it does not look to me like it was written by someone who does not have English as their first language. It looks to me like it was written by a reasonably literate person who was brought up with English from birth. Secondly it looks very laboured as if the person or persons writing it were trying to shroud the truth from the reader. The parts of it about praising the police and fire brigade look as if they’ve been inserted for effect, to make the invaders look law abiding and decent.

The sections of the alleged letter from the invaders that deal with the alleged physical and mental problems suffered by the internees do not look exactly unsuspicious to me either. They look to me very similar to the sort of comments made over the years to the press and others by various pro-invader groups and the ‘refugees welcome’ lunatics who have been assisting the illegal migrants in the Calais area of France. These comments are made I suspect to make the invaders look like vulnerable people whom we should all feel sorry for and not the potentially dangerous ponces that they all too often turn out to be. Also the parts of the letter about the protests against the Home Secretary’s words and actions regarding the accommodation are straight out of the ‘refugees welcome’ groups playbook and I doubt that they have come from the mouths or pens of the invaders themselves.

I would not be at all surprised to find out later that this alleged ‘letter from the invaders’ did not come from anyone who is being held in the camp but instead was crafted by one of more of those involved in campaigning for these invaders to be let out of Napier Barracks and to be allowed to disappear into the community. This letter is to me highly suspicious and should be treated as such. I believe and will continue to believe until proven otherwise that it is complete and utter bullshit and probably put together by those with a political interest in having these invaders released to walk our streets. We should not forget that these ‘refugees welcome’ clowns got pretty badly burned reputation-wise following the Palmers Green bomb attack when a Channel ‘refugee’ set off a bomb on a tube train. This letter may well be an attempt by one or more of these pro-invader groups, to protect their own reputation and activities now that their pet invaders have been revealed to be fire setting animals.

I would not treat this letter at face value, in fact it would be far better to be suspicious of it and do more digging about how it appeared and how it got to the London based journalist Jack Shenker who writes for the Guardian. Now of course, I’m in no way saying or even intimating that Mr Shenker was involved in the production of this letter, but it was quite possible that left wing groups may have used him as a conduit to get this alleged letter from the invaders out into the world. The most likely scenario as I see it is that Mr Shenker because who he has written for in the past may have been targeted or seen as a potentially sympathetic voice by those with an agenda to promote the entry of the Channel invaders.

As I said earlier, this letter looks highly suspicious. I don’t trust it and I don’t believe that it came directly from where it is being claimed that it came from.