To anyone on the centre Right and who like me are of the civic nationalist persuasion, neo-Nazis are like the persistent haemorrhoids of politics. Just like an attack of the bum grapes, neo-Nazis pop out of the wood work or from under various foetid stones and become a pain in the arse that needs either medicating or removal. Most of them are basement dwelling loners who can be safely ignored but others slither around practising a similar types of entryism into right and centre right groups as the Marxists do with the UK Labour Party. If you run any sort of right or centre right or civic nationalist group then it pays to be aware of such potential for entryism and take steps to prevent it happening. If you are such an organisation or involved in one then the very last thing you want becoming attached to your group are the sort of people who goose step around their basement when nobody is looking or who have a copy of Mein Kampf where all the pages are suspiciously stuck together.

Such people are bad political optics and can kill outright your sensible rightist or civic nationalist organisation should they become involved. The involvement of such people, along with tin foil hatters and the supporters of discredited cancer cure quacks, is what killed off the London Yellow Vests group and turned them from what could have been a positive movement into a public laughing stock.

However there are a third type who genuinely are supportive of violence and are so extreme that they are genuinely dangerous and who are little different from the likes of Charles Manson in so far as their ultimate aims are to start a race war. One such individual is Andrew Dymock who has been gaoled for seven years by a judge at the Old Bailey in London after being convicted of encouraging violence and amongst other things raising money for a far right terror organisation.

Now I agree that the use of the term ‘far right’ is over used and is often applied to anyone that the Left doesn’t like but in the case of Dymock, who earned the title ‘Nazi bum carver’ because he scratched a swastika on his then girlfriends buttock, it’s well deserved. This guy really is the far right real deal the sort of person who if he’d been around in the 1930’s would have been donning a Blackshirt and following Oswald Mosley.

If Dymock has been convicted of genuinely trying to start a race war by producing stuff that crossed the line that divides free speech and the US First Amendment standard of ‘credibly and immediately inciting violence’ then I have no problem with him being gaoled. The only issue that I have is that his sentence is greater than many of those handed down to Islamic jihadists who have done similar things. For example: Earlier this year three Mohammeds (yes all three defendants in this particular case were called ‘Mohammed’) were gaoled for five years, five years and four years respectively. These lesser sentences were given for offences that are very similar, although without the fundraising for terror aspect, to those committed by Dymock. It’s likely that Dymock will serve a longer sentence even with remission than the ‘Mohammeds’ will even though the threat of terror from Islamic groups is a much bigger problem than terror from deluded jackboot lickers like Dymock. The answer to this problem is I believe not to reduce the sentences of deluded jackboot lickers but to increase the sentences for Jihadis in order to protect the public from a threat that is much more real and present than that posed by the jackboot lickers.

Whilst all judges are mostly at liberty to impose a sentence that is based on the evidence that they hear presented to them in their court, the significant difference in the severity of the sentences between the Jihadist nutters and the jackboot licking nutter does look to me like something of a double standard. Why should the promoters of jihadism, a doctrine that has killed well over a hundred Britons since the turn of the century get lesser sentences than jackboot licking nutters whose death toll during the same time period barely makes double figures? Surely the bigger threat should attract the bigger and more exemplary sentence?

Dymock truly is an out there nutcase who as well as carving a swastika on his then girlfriends arse cheek also helped to build a successor organisation to the now banned National Action group a group that were openly neo-Nazi. He also had links with similar neo-Nazis in both the USA and in Europe. I really don’t care that he has been gaoled, he’s not the sort of person that I would associate with either directly or indirectly. He’s the sort of person who gives the more sensible parts of the right a very bad name because the Left works very hard to associate arseholes like Dymock with more sensible rightists even when there is no tangible link between them.

Personally I couldn’t care less whether these deluded jackboot lickers follow their uni-testicled Austrian leader into oblivion. However what I do care about is that all extremists whether they are jihadists, deranged neo-Nazis and the violent freaks of groups like Antifa face the same justice and receive similar punishments.